Quality Control and Image Quality Criteria in Computed Tomography

1995 ◽  
Vol 57 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 125-127
Author(s):  
J. Albrechtsen ◽  
J. Hansen ◽  
L.C. Jensen ◽  
K.A. Jessen ◽  
A.G. Jurik
1995 ◽  
Vol 57 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 125-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Albrechtsen ◽  
J. Hansen ◽  
L.C. Jensen ◽  
K.A. Jessen ◽  
A.G. Jurik

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey K Korir ◽  
Jeska Sidika Wambani ◽  
Ian K Korir

Background. The wide use of ionising radiation in medical care has resulted in the largest man-made cause of radiation exposure. In recent years, diagnostic departments in Kenya have adapted the high-speed film/screen combination without well-established quality control, objective image quality criteria, and assessment of patient dose. The safety of patients in terms of justification and the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle is inadequate without quality assurance measures. Aim. This study assessed the level of film rejects, device performance, image quality and patient dose in 4 representative hospitals using high-speed film/screen combination. Results. The X-ray equipment quality control tests performance range was 67% to 90%, and 63% of the radiographs were of good diagnostic value. The measured prevalent chest examination entrance surface dose (ESD) showed levels above the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), while lumbar spine and pelvis examination was the largest source of radiation exposure to patients. Conclusion. The optimisation of patient protection can be achieved with optimally performing X-ray equipment, the application of good radiographic technique, and continuous assessment of radiographic image quality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1194-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helle Precht ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Jesper Thygesen ◽  
Kenneth Egstrup ◽  
Søren Auscher ◽  
...  

Background Computed tomography (CT) technology is rapidly evolving and software solution developed to optimize image quality and/or lower radiation dose. Purpose To investigate the influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at different radiation doses in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in detailed image quality. Material and Methods A total of 160 CCTA were reconstructed as follows: 55 scans with filtered back projection (FBP) (650 mA), 51 scans (455 mA) with 30% ASIR (ASIR30), and 54 scans (295 mA) with 60% ASIR (ASIR60). For each reconstruction, subjective image quality was assessed by five independent certified cardiologists using a visual grading analysis (VGA) with five predefined image quality criteria consisting of a 5-point scale. Objective measures were contrast, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Results The CTDIvol resulted in 10.3 mGy, 7.4 mGy, and 4.6 mGy for FBP, ASIR30, and ASIR60, respectively. Homogeneity of the left ventricular lumen was the sole aspect in which reconstruction algorithms differed with a decreasing effect for ASIR60 compared to FBP (estimated odds ratio [OR] = 0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.32–0.76; P = 0.001]). Decreased sharpness and spatial- and low-contrast resolutions were observed when using ASIR instead of FBP, but differences were not statistically significant. Concerning objective measurements, noise increased significantly for ASIR30 (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.14; P = 0.006) and ASIR60 (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.01–1.12; P = 0.034) compared to FBP. Conclusion ASIR significantly decreased the subjectively assessed homogeneity of the left ventricular lumen and increased the objectively measured noise compared to FBP. Considering these results, ASIR at a reduced radiation dose should be implemented with caution.


2014 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald R. Torgersen ◽  
Caroline Hol ◽  
Anne Møystad ◽  
Kristina Hellén-Halme ◽  
Mats Nilsson

2000 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jurik ◽  
J. Petersen ◽  
K.A. Jessen ◽  
G. Bongartz ◽  
J. Geleijns ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Poskaite ◽  
M Pamminger ◽  
C Kranewitter ◽  
C Kremser ◽  
M Reindl ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is one of progressive expansion. Asymptomatic patients who do not meet criteria for repair require conservative management including ongoing aneurysm surveillance, mostly carried out by contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA). Purpose To prospectively compare image quality and reliability of a prototype non-contrast, self-navigated 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for sizing of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Methods Self-navigated 3D whole-heart 1.5 T MRA was performed in 20 patients (aged 67 ± 8.6 years, 75% male) for sizing of TAA; a subgroup of 18 (90%) patients underwent additional contrast-enhanced CTA on the same day. Subjective image quality was scored according to a 4-point Likert scale and ratings between observers were compared by Cohen’s Kappa statistics. Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Overall subjective image quality as rated by two observers was 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-2] for self-navigated MRA and 1.5 [IQR 1-2] for CTA (p = 0.717). For MRA a perfect inter-observer agreement was found for presence of artefacts and subjective image sharpness (κ=1). Subjective signal inhomogeneity correlated highly with objectively quantified inhomogeneity of the blood pool signal (r = 0.78-0.824, all p <0.0001). Maximum diameters of TAA as measured by self-navigated MRA and CTA showed excellent correlation (r = 0.997, p < 0.0001) without significant inter-method bias (bias -0.0278, lower and upper limit of agreement -0.74 and 0.68, p = 0.749). Inter- and intraobserver correlation of aortic aneurysm as measured by MRA was excellent (r = 0.963 and 0.967, respectively) without significant bias (all p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion Self-navigated 3D whole-heart MRA enables reliable contrast- and radiation free aortic dilation surveillance without significant difference to standardized CTA while providing predictable acquisition time and by offering excellent image quality. Abstract Figure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document