Integrating behavioral health and primary care: a qualitative analysis of financial barriers and solutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-656
Author(s):  
Alison C Shmerling ◽  
Stephanie B Gold ◽  
Emma C Gilchrist ◽  
Benjamin F Miller

Abstract The objective of this study was to characterize financial barriers and solutions for the integration of behavioral health in primary care at the practice and system levels. Semi-structured interviews were conducted March–August of 2015 with 77 key informants. Initially a broad thematic coding approach was used, and data coded as “financing” was further analyzed in ATLAS.ti using an inductive thematic approach by three coders. Themes identified included the following: fragmentation of payment and inadequate investment limit movement toward integration; the evidence base for integration is not well known and requires appropriately structured further study; fee-for-service limits the movement to integration—an alternative payment system is needed; there are financial considerations beyond specific models of payment, including incentivizing innovation, prevention, and practice transformation support; stakeholders need to be engaged and aligned to support this process. There was consensus that the current fragmented, fee-for-service system with inadequate baseline reimbursement significantly hinders progression toward integrated behavioral health and primary care. Funding is needed both to support integrated care and to facilitate the transition to a new model. Multiple suggestions were offered regarding interim solutions to move toward an integrated model and ultimately global payment. Payment, in terms of both adequate amount and model, is a significant obstacle to integrating behavioral health and primary care. Future policy efforts must focus on ensuring stakeholder collaboration, multi-payer alignment, increasing investment in behavioral health and primary care, and moving away from fee-for-service toward a global and value-based payment model.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-538
Author(s):  
Kari A Stephens ◽  
Constance van Eeghen ◽  
Brenda Mollis ◽  
Margaret Au ◽  
Stephanie A Brennhofer ◽  
...  

Abstract A movement towards integrated behavioral health (IBH) in primary care continues to grow, among an accumulating evidence base for its effectiveness for improving care. However, healthcare organizations struggle to navigate where to target their limited resources for improving integration. We evaluated a cross-model framework of IBH core processes and structures. We used a mixed-methods approach for evaluation of the framework, which included (a) an evaluation survey of national experts and stakeholders, (b) crosswalks with common IBH measures, and (c) a real-world usability test. Five core IBH principles, mapping to 25 processes, and nine clinic structures were defined. Survey responses from 29 IBH domain and policy experts and stakeholders resulted in uniformly high ratings of importance and variable levels of feasibility for measurement, particularly with respect to electronic health record (EHR) systems. A real-world usability test resulted in good uptake and use of the framework across a state-wide effort. An IBH Cross-Model Framework of core principles, processes, and structures generated good acceptability and showed good real-world utility in a state-wide effort to improve IBH across disparate levels of integration in diverse primary care settings. Findings identify feasible areas of measurement, particularly with EHR systems. Next steps include testing the relationship between the individual framework components and patient outcomes to help guide clinics towards prioritizing efforts focused on improving integration.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Hunter ◽  
Jeffrey L. Goodie ◽  
Mark S. Oordt ◽  
Anne C. Dobmeyer

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-533
Author(s):  
Aubry N Koehler ◽  
Grisel Trejo ◽  
Joanne C Sandberg ◽  
Brittany H Swain ◽  
Gail S Marion ◽  
...  

Background: Limited research is available around patient experience of integrated behavioral health care in primary care settings. Objective: We sought to identify the major themes through which patients described their integrated behavioral health care experiences as a means of informing and improving clinic processes of integrated health care delivery. Methods: We captured viewpoints from 16 patients who experienced an integrated behavioral health care model from 2 primary care clinics and completed at least 3 visits with a behavioral health provider (BHP). Using grounded theory analyses, we coded and analyzed transcriptions for emergent themes. Analysis: The interview process yielded 3 major themes related to the BHP including (a) the BHPs’ clinic presence made behavioral health care more convenient and accessible, (b) BHPs worked within time and program limitations, and (c) BHPs helped with coping, wellness, and patient-care team communication. Conclusion: The BHPs serving in a large primary care practice and a Federally Qualified Health Center played an important role in connecting patients with behavioral health care and improving care team collaboration, both in terms of communication within the team and between the team and the patient/family.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Kanzler ◽  
Patricia Robinson ◽  
Mariana Munante ◽  
Donald McGeary ◽  
Jennifer Potter ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study seeks to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a brief acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) treatment for chronic pain patients in a primary care clinic METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Primary care patients aged 18 years and older with at least 1 pain condition for 12 weeks or more in duration will be recruited. Patients will be randomized into (a) ACT intervention or (b) control group. Participants in the ACT arm will attend 1 individual visit with an integrated behavioral health provider, followed by 3 weekly ACT classes and a booster class 2 months later. Control group will receive enhanced primary care that includes patient education handouts informed by cognitive behavioral science. Data analysis will include 1-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), multiple regression with bootstrapping. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The overall hypothesis is that brief ACT treatment reduces physical disability, improves functioning, and reduces medication misuse in chronic pain patients when delivered by an integrated behavioral health provider in primary care. In addition, it is anticipated that improvements in patient functioning will be mediated by patient change in pain acceptance and patient engagement in value-consistent behaviors. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This pilot study will establish preliminary data about the effectiveness of addressing chronic pain in a generalizable integrated primary care setting. Data will help support a larger trial in the future. Findings have potential to transform the way chronic pain is currently managed in primary care settings, with results that could decrease disability and improve functioning among patients suffering from chronic pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gautier ◽  
Y Bourgueil

Abstract Background In France, primary care is organised according to the principles of private practice: independent providers, payment by fee for service, freedom of settlement... Successive reforms have introduced more regulation i.e. gatekeeping role for GPs, better recognition of professional groups, new forms of payment and promotion of team work and multi-professional practices. Today, the concept of Health Territorial and Professional Communities (HTPC) is becoming a key element of health care reform encouraging primary care professionals to meet with specialists and social workers at a larger level than practice. HTPC should address issues such as access to services, coordination of care and promoting of preventive actions toward populations. This implies change in the roles, skills, methods and resources needed on both professional and regulatory sides. This study explores levers of the professional commitment in the HTPC and resources necessary for it. Methods We conducted a qualitative multiple case study in three French regions. Data was collected from thirty semi-structured interviews with key national informants, regional regulators and health professionals themselves. Results Professional commitment emerges at a local level on a territory defined by the collaboration practices and habits following a bottom-up process. The integration of care relies on the size of the HTPC which allows them to know each other and to work together to improve access to care and patient’s disease management. In order to achieve that, professionals claim to have access to administrative health data and to be able to analyze it. They need to develop news skills in management and group animation. The function and training of coordination professionals appear to be essential. Conclusions The professional commitment in HTPC relies on professional empowerment toward collective activities. This requires autonomy, skills and new roles both for professionals and regulatory authorities. Key messages French government relies on professionals’ investment at the territorial level by implementing HTPC to guarantee access to care and respond to population needs in primary care. HTPC implementation implies radical change for the professionals to undertake social and populational responsibility for which public health professionals should help to meet the challenge.


2016 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 74-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Padwa ◽  
Cheryl Teruya ◽  
Elise Tran ◽  
Katherine Lovinger ◽  
Valerie P. Antonini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document