scholarly journals Optimization of Spider Silk Glands for the Elicited Production of a Tissue‐Specific Fibroin Product

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Marie Marrero ◽  
Ivelisse Cajigas ◽  
Xiomara Cajigas ◽  
Shadia Medina ◽  
Marcos Llavona ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Clarke ◽  
Jessica E. Garb ◽  
Robert A. Haney ◽  
R. Crystal Chaw ◽  
Cheryl Y. Hayashi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 4223-4231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ro Crystal Chaw ◽  
Sandra M. Correa-Garhwal ◽  
Thomas H. Clarke ◽  
Nadia A. Ayoub ◽  
Cheryl Y. Hayashi
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 451-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Liu ◽  
Sanyuan Ma ◽  
Jiasong Chang ◽  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Xiaogang Wang ◽  
...  

Diversity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas O. Wolff

Despite the recognition of spider silk as a biological super-material and its dominant role in various aspects of a spider’s life, knowledge on silk use and silk properties is incomplete. This is a major impediment for the general understanding of spider ecology, spider silk evolution and biomaterial prospecting. In particular, the biological role of different types of silk glands is largely unexplored. Here, I report the results from a comparative study of spinneret usage during silk anchor and dragline spinning. I found that the use of both anterior lateral spinnerets (ALS) and posterior median spinnerets (PMS) is the plesiomorphic state of silk anchor and dragline spinning in the Araneomorphae, with transitions to ALS-only use in the Araneoidea and some smaller lineages scattered across the spider tree of life. Opposing the reduction to using a single spinneret pair, few taxa have switched to using all ALS, PMS and the posterior lateral spinnerets (PLS) for silk anchor and dragline formation. Silk fibres from the used spinnerets (major ampullate, minor ampullate and aciniform silk) were generally bundled in draglines after the completion of silk anchor spinning. Araneoid spiders were highly distinct from most other spiders in their draglines, being composed of major ampullate silk only. This indicates that major ampullate silk properties reported from comparative measurements of draglines should be handled with care. These observations call for a closer investigation of the function of different silk glands in spiders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Garb ◽  
Robert A. Haney ◽  
Evelyn E. Schwager ◽  
Matjaž Gregorič ◽  
Matjaž Kuntner ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 357 (1418) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Knight ◽  
F. Vollrath

The Sicarid spider Loxosceles laeta spins broad but very thin ribbons of elastic silk that it uses to form a retreat and to capture prey. A structural investigation into this spider's silk and spinning apparatus shows that these ribbons are spun from a gland homologous to the major ampullate gland of orb web spiders. The Loxosceles gland is constructed from the same basic parts (separate transverse zones in the gland, a duct and spigot) as other spider silk glands but construction details are highly specialized. These differences are thought to relate to different ways of spinning silk in the two groups of spiders. Loxosceles uses conventional die extrusion, feeding a liquid dope (spinning solution) to the slit–like die to form a flat ribbon, while orb web spiders use an extrusion process in which the silk dope is processed in an elongated duct to produce a cylindrical thread. This is achieved by the combination of an initial internal draw down, well inside the duct, and a final draw down, after the silk has left the spigot. The spinning mechanism in Loxosceles may be more ancestral.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document