Modulating Motor Activity and White Matter Tracts Through Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Lisa Hirt ◽  
Steven G. Ojemann ◽  
John A. Thompson
2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Prent ◽  
Wouter V. Potters ◽  
Lennard I. Boon ◽  
Matthan W. A. Caan ◽  
Rob M. A. de Bie ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) alleviates motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the underlying mechanism of tremor suppression is not well understood. Stimulation of white matter tracts, such as the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRT), might be involved. Also, side effects, including dysarthria, might result from (unwanted) stimulation of white matter tracts in proximity to the STN. The aim of this study was to establish an association between stimulation effect on tremor and dysarthria and stimulation location relative to relevant white matter tracts.METHODSIn 35 PD patients in whom a bilateral STN DBS system was implanted, the authors established clinical outcome measures per electrode contact. The distance from each stimulation location to the center of the DRT, corticopontocerebellar tract, pyramidal tract (PT), and medial lemniscus was determined using diffusion-weighted MRI data. Clinical outcome measures were subsequently related to the distances to the white matter tracts.RESULTSPatients with activated contacts closer to the DRT showed increased tremor improvement. Proximity of activated contacts to the PT was associated with dysarthria.CONCLUSIONSProximity to specific white matter tracts is associated with tremor outcome and side effects in DBS. This knowledge can help to optimize both electrode placement and postsurgical electrode contact selection. Presurgical white matter tract visualization may improve targeting and DBS outcome. These findings are of interest not only for treatment in PD, but potentially also for other (movement) disorders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2561-2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Costentin ◽  
Stéphane Derrey ◽  
Emmanuel Gérardin ◽  
Yohann Cruypeninck ◽  
Thibaut Pressat‐Laffouilhere ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. E8
Author(s):  
Vance T. Lehman ◽  
Kendall H. Lee ◽  
Bryan T. Klassen ◽  
Daniel J. Blezek ◽  
Abhinav Goyal ◽  
...  

The thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) can be targeted for treatment of tremor by several procedures, including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and, more recently, MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). To date, such targeting has relied predominantly on coordinate-based or atlas-based techniques rather than directly targeting the VIM based on imaging features. While general regional differences of features within the thalamus and some related white matter tracts can be distinguished with conventional imaging techniques, internal nuclei such as the VIM are not discretely visualized. Advanced imaging methods such as quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR) MRI and high-field MRI pulse sequences that improve the ability to image the VIM region are emerging but have not yet been shown to have reliability and accuracy to serve as the primary method of VIM targeting. Currently, the most promising imaging approach to directly identify the VIM region for clinical purposes is MR diffusion tractography.In this review and update, the capabilities and limitations of conventional and emerging advanced methods for evaluation of internal thalamic anatomy are briefly reviewed. The basic principles of tractography most relevant to VIM targeting are provided for familiarization. Next, the key literature to date addressing applications of DTI and tractography for DBS and MRgFUS is summarized, emphasizing use of direct targeting. This literature includes 1-tract (dentatorubrothalamic tract [DRT]), 2-tract (pyramidal and somatosensory), and 3-tract (DRT, pyramidal, and somatosensory) approaches to VIM region localization through tractography.The authors introduce a 3-tract technique used at their institution, illustrating the oblique curved course of the DRT within the inferior thalamus as well as the orientation and relationship of the white matter tracts in the axial plane. The utility of this 3-tract tractography approach to facilitate VIM localization is illustrated with case examples of variable VIM location, targeting superior to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure plane, and treatment in the setting of pathologic derangement of thalamic anatomy. Finally, concepts demonstrated with these case examples and from the prior literature are synthesized to highlight several potential advantages of tractography for VIM region targeting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S532-S533
Author(s):  
D. Clark ◽  
K. Johnson ◽  
C. Butson ◽  
C. Lebel ◽  
D. Gobbi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luka C. Liebrand ◽  
Samuel J. Natarajan ◽  
Matthan W.A. Caan ◽  
P. Rick Schuurman ◽  
Pepijn van den Munckhof ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an innovative treatment for treatment-resistant depression. DBS is usually targeted at specific anatomical landmarks, with patients responding to DBS in approximately 50% of cases. Attention has recently shifted to white matter tracts to explain DBS response, with initial open-label trials targeting white matter tracts yielding much higher response rates (>70%).MethodsWe associated distance to individual white matter tracts around the stimulation target in the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule to treatment response. We performed diffusion magnetic resonance tractography of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle and the anterior thalamic radiation in fourteen patients that participated in our randomized clinical trial. We combined the tract reconstructions with the postoperative images to identify the DBS leads and estimated the distance between tracts and leads, which we subsequently associated with treatment response.ResultsStimulation closer to both tracts was significantly correlated to a larger symptom decrease (r=0.61, p=0.02), suggesting that stimulation more proximal to the tracts was beneficial. There was no difference in lead placement with respect to anatomical landmarks, which could mean that differences in treatment response were driven by individual differences in white matter anatomy.ConclusionsOur results suggest that deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule could benefit from targeting white matter bundles. We recommend acquiring diffusion magnetic resonance data for each individual patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document