Low Complication Rate Associated with Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia for HIV-1–Infected Women on Antiretroviral Therapy

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Avidan ◽  
Philippa Groves ◽  
Margaret Blott ◽  
Jan Welch ◽  
Theresa Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Hiv 1

Background Elective cesarean section decreases the likelihood of vertical human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission from mother to infant. This study aimed to determine whether cesarean section done with spinal anesthesia on HIV-1-infected pregnant women taking antiretroviral therapy is associated with intraoperative hemodynamic instability, postoperative complications, or changes in immune function or HIV-1 viral load. Methods A case-controlled study was conducted over a 3-year period in a London academic hospital. Forty-four women infected with HIV-1 and a control group of 45 HIV-negative women undergoing cesarean sections were included. The main outcome measures included intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, blood loss, and ephedrine requirements, and postoperative infective complications, blood transfusion, changes in blood HIV-1 viral load and lymphocyte subsets, and time to hospital discharge. Results There were no differences in hemodynamic stability and postoperative complications between the HIV-infected group and the controls. There was an acute postoperative increase in the CD4T lymphocyte count (P = 0.01), but the CD4T:CD8T ratio and viral load did not change. Conclusions Elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for women infected with HIV-1 taking antiretroviral therapy was not associated with intraoperative or postoperative complications.

scholarly journals Hemodynamic effects of right pelvic wedge in patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-74
Author(s):  
Rohini Sigdel ◽  
Maya Lama ◽  
Sanish Gurung ◽  
Bishal Gurung ◽  
Anil Prasad Neupane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Operating Table ◽  
Hemodynamic Effects ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Spinal Hypotension ◽  
The Right

Background: Several methods have been used to prevent post spinal hypotension including preloading, co-loading, use of vasopressors, placement of pelvic wedge, lumbar wedge and tilting of operating table in parturients undergoing cesarean section. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine the hemodynamic effects of a standard pelvic wedge placed below the right hip immediately after the spinal block till the delivery of baby. Methods: One hundred consenting women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to wedge group (N=50) and control group (N=50). A standard wedge was placed under the right pelvis soon after spinal anesthesia till the delivery of baby in wedge group whereas the control group remained supine. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor consumption, other side effects like nausea, vomiting and neonatal outcome were also recorded. Results: The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was similar between groups (Wedge group 60% vs Control group 75.51%, p=0.125) before the birth of baby. The use of vasopressors (p=0.212), incidence of nausea (p=0.346) and Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes (p=0.629, p=0.442) were also not statistically significant. None of the patients had vomiting. Conclusion: In our study, the use of right pelvic wedge immediately after spinal anesthesia was not effective in preventing post spinal hypotension in elective cesarean section.

scholarly journals Tranexamic acid in prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in elective cesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 372
Author(s):  
Pravin Shah ◽  
Ajay Agrawal ◽  
Shailaja Chhetri ◽  
Pappu Rijal ◽  
Nisha K. Bhatta
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
The Mean

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage is a common and occasionally life-threatening complication of labor. Cesarean section is associated with more blood loss in compared to vaginal delivery. Despite, there is a trend for increasing cesarean section rates in both developed and developing countries thereby increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially among anemic women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of intravenous Tranexamic acid on blood loss during and after elective cesarean section.Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study with 160 eligible pregnant women of 37 or more period of gestation. They were all planned for elective cesarean section and were randomized into two groups either to receive 10ml (1gm) of Tranexamic acid intravenously or 10ml of normal saline. Blood loss was measured during and for 24 hours after operation.Results: The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in women treated with Tranexamic acid compared with women in the placebo group (392.13 ml±10.06 vs 498.69 ml±15.87, respectively; p<0.001). The mean difference in pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels was statistically significant in the Tranexamic acid group than in the control group (0.31±0.18 vs 0.79±0.23, respectively; p<0.001).Conclusions: Pre-operative use of Tranexamic acid is associated with reduced blood loss during and after elective cesarean section. In a developing country like ours where postpartum hemorrhage is a major threat to the life of the mothers, it seems to be a promising option.

scholarly journals Phenylephrine Effectiveness in Handling Hypotensive Issues During Spinal Anesthesia Conductance for Cesarean Section Deliveries

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Research Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Values ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
The Impact

Background: Hypotension is frequent clinical challenge during spinal mode of anesthetic induction for cesarean delivery. Requiring an effective and prompt management mode since it has unfavorable clinical outcomes such as hemodynamic cardiovascular instability issues besides reduced uteroplacental perfusion. Aim: Investigating the impact and effectiveness of different prophylacticdosages of Phenylephrine on hypotensive issues during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section deliveries. Methodology:A prospective, randomized, clinical research study involved 184 cases That are classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II with term singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia randomized to receive 0.9% saline 2 mL (Control Group) or phenylephrine1.0 ug/kg (PHE1 research Group), 1.5 ug/kg (PHE1.5 research Group), or 2.0 ug/kg (PHE2 research Group) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: The adverse effects of prophylactic bolus ofPhenylephrine among the research groups control, Phenylephrine 1, 1.5,2 in which there was statistically significant difference as regards hypotension, rescue Phenylephrine,lowest SBP,highest SBP,early highest SBP,mean SBP, occurrence of hypertension (p values= <0.001, <0.001, 0.002, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001consecutively) there was no statistical significant difference as regards nausea and bradycardia (p values=0.929, 0.823consecutively). Conclusions: The research findings obtained denote and imply that a prophylactic Phenylephrine 1.5 ug/kg bolus followed by additional boluses when necessary could be an alternative management protocol to decrease the frequency of hypotensive issues occurrence during spinal anesthetic mode for cesarean deliveries.

scholarly journals Association of lipophilic opioids and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Randomized controlled study

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 752-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélica de Fátima de Assunção Braga ◽  
Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga ◽  
Eunice Sizue Hirata ◽  
Rosa Inês Costa Pereira ◽  
José Aristeu Frias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Elective Cesarean

scholarly journals Effect of fentanyl on nausea and vomiting in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 4798-4807
Author(s):  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Yeojung Kim ◽  
Boohwi Hong ◽  
Seok-Hwa Yoon ◽  
Chae Seong Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Sedation Level ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Group 5

Objective Although opioids may induce nausea and vomiting, they possess sedative effects and can reduce intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). This study assessed the effect of adding fentanyl to midazolam on sedation levels and IONV during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods Eighty parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled in the study. Following fetal delivery, patients were administered 0.05 mg/kg of midazolam plus 0.03 mL/kg of normal saline (M group) or 0.05 mg/kg of midazolam plus 1.5 μg/kg of fentanyl (MF group). The primary outcome was the incidence of IONV. The secondary outcomes were incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative sedation level, and five-point patient satisfaction score (PSS). Results The IONV incidence was significantly lower in the MF group compared with the M group (5% [2/40] vs. 25% [10/40]). The PONV incidence did not differ significantly between the groups. The intraoperative sedation level tended to be deeper in the MF group. The 5-point PSS was significantly higher in the MF group. There was a strong correlation between the sedation level and IONV incidence. Conclusions Adding fentanyl to midazolam is effective for sedation and to prevent IONV in women who are undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Leg Elevation to Prevent Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension during Cesarean Delivery in the Resource-Limited Area: Open Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sofia Assen ◽  
Bedru Jemal ◽  
Adane Tesfaye
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Severe Hypotension ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Background. Postspinal hypotension is the most common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section (CS). Hypotension mainly occurs due to the reductions of vascular tone leading to decreased systemic vascular resistance and decreased venous return. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of leg elevation (LE) as a method of prevention of postspinal hypotension in patients who undergo cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods. This is a single-center parallel-randomized controlled trial study, and 52 full-term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section who meets inclusion criteria were included in the study. The randomization sequence was created by a researcher not participating in patient management using a computer random generator. The participant was randomly assigned to the leg elevation group (n = 26) or to the control group (n = 26) of usual perioperative care. Results. The proportions of patients who develop hypotension are lower (8 (33.3%)) in the leg elevation group than the control group (15 (62.5%)) with an X2 (1, N = 48) = 4.09, P=0.043. The relative risk of developing postspinal hypotension in the leg elevation group compared to the control group was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.28–1.00). The proportion of severe hypotension was significantly decreased in the leg elevation group at a P value of 0.02. Conclusion. Performing leg elevation immediately after spinal anesthesia reduced the incidence of hypotension. The trial is registered with PACTR201908713181850.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document