Efficacy and Safety of Heparinase I  versus Protamine in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with and without Cardiopulmonary Bypass 

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Stafford-Smith ◽  
Edward A. Lefrak ◽  
Anjum G. Qazi ◽  
Ian J. Welsby ◽  
Linda Barber ◽  
...  

Background Hemodynamic protamine reactions with heparin reversal during cardiac surgery are common and associated with adverse outcomes. As an alternative to protamine, the authors examined heparinase I reversal of heparin after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, 167 on- and off-pump aortocoronary bypass graft surgery patients received either heparinase I (maximum 35 microg/kg) or protamine (maximum 650 mg) for heparin reversal, monitored by activated clotting time values and clinical assessment. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded electronically; safety evaluation was to 30 days postoperatively. Noninferiority was predefined as 400 ml or less median 12-h chest tube drainage from intensive care unit arrival for heparinase I patients, after risk adjustment. Hemodynamic instability was defined as systemic hypotension (> or = 30 mmHg decrease) and/or pulmonary hypertension (> or = 40 mmHg with an increase > or = 10 mmHg) within 30 min of heparin reversal initiation. Results Patient enrollment was terminated on advisement of the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Although heparinase I was noninferior for 12-h chest tube drainage, protamine had a superior safety profile. Overall, heparinase I subjects had longer hospital stays (P = 0.04), were more likely to experience a serious adverse event (P = 0.01), and were less likely to avoid transfusion (P = 0.006). A composite morbidity score was not different (P = 0.24), and similar rates of hemodynamic instability were observed between groups. Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by on- and off-pump surgery. Conclusions Heparinase I reverses heparin anticoagulation after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery but is not equivalent to protamine because of its inferior safety profile.

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Juozas Kapturauskas ◽  
Edmundas Širvinskas

Increasing numbers of patients with diabetes mellitus are referred to cardiac surgery. Biguanides are still first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes in all over the world. According preoperative guidelines, oral diabetes medications should be held on the day of surgery because of increased risk of lactic acidosis, induced by Metformin in patients after heart surgery. However, not well described in medical literature mechanism of biguanides is its influence to coagulation. We observed patients, who were scheduled for an elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Eighteen were diabetics, fourteen were Metformin users, where medication was stopped 72 to 24 hours before surgery. Prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, fibrinogen measurement were performed at the baseline, 2 hours and 6 hours after weaning from CPB. Chest tube drainage was checked at 2, 6 and 24 hours after weaning from CPB at the ICU. Presence of fibrinolysis was checked with rotational thromboelastometry testing (Rotem, Tem Innovation, Germany). Statistical analysis showed weak negative correlation between chest tube output in 24 hours and Metformin use (r=-0.255, p=0.03). Patients with Metformin preoperatively had less chest tube drainage (457.1 ± 143.9ml) compared to patients without Metformin (622.2 ± 269.9ml). Here was no significant fibrinolysis in ROTEM tests registered (ML 3.5 ± 2.5%) and apTEM didn`t show improved maximal cloth firmness (MCF) nor shor- ter clothing time (CF).


2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1263-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Kluger ◽  
David J. Olive ◽  
Andrew B. Stewart ◽  
Carolyn M. Blyth

Background Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (epsilon-ACA), an antifibrinolytic agent, is used in cardiac surgery to decrease postoperative bleeding. Theoretical concerns exist about the potential for epsilon-ACA to contribute to thrombotic complications. For this reason epsilon-ACA administration is sometimes delayed until after heparinization. This study investigated the impact of the timing of epsilon-ACA administration on its efficacy. Methods In this double-blind study, 90 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either epsilon-ACA commencing prior to skin incision (bolus 150 mg/kg, followed by an infusion at 15 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1), epsilon-ACA commencing after heparin (same doses), or placebo. All infusions were terminated at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. Criteria for the transfusion of blood products were standardized. Postoperative chest tube drainage (at 6 h, 12 h, and at chest tube removal) and blood transfusion requirements of the three groups were compared. Results At all time intervals, the placebo group had significantly greater chest tube drainage than either of the two epsilon-ACA groups (P < 0.005). At no time did a significant difference exist between the two epsilon-ACA groups. A trend existed for the placebo group to require more blood products than either epsilon-ACA group. Conclusions Epsilon-ACA produces a reduction in chest tube drainage in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This effect is similar whether the drug is given prior to incision or following anticoagulation. Given the similar hemostatic efficacy and the theoretical potential for thrombotic complications, it may be prudent to administer epsilon-ACA following anticoagulation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atanu Pan ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Background: Empyema thoracis (ET) is a serious infection of the pleural space. Despite the availability of broad spectrum antibacterial, improved vaccination coverage and better diagnostic tools, Empyema Thoracis remains associated with high morbidity worldwide. Delay   in   early   diagnosis,   failure   to institute   appropriate   antimicrobial   therapy,   multidrug resistant   organisms,   malnutrition,   comorbidities,   poor health  seeking  behaviour  and  high treatment  cost  burden contribute  to  increased  morbidity  in  children. The available  treatment  options  include  intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics  either  alone  or  in  combination  with surgical  procedure  (thoracocentesis,  chest  tube  drainage, fibrinolytic  therapy,  decortications  with  video  assistedthoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open drainage. Methods: Fifty Children between 1 month to 16 years admitted in the Pediatrics Ward, PICU of College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur,Nepal. Data analysis was done by SPSS 24.0. Results: Present study found that according to blood culture, 3(6.0%) patients had enterococcus, 40(80.0%) patients had no growth, 2(4.0%) patients had pseudomonas, 4(8.0%) patients had staphylococcus and 1(2.0%) patients had streptococcus. We found that 20(40.0%) patients had done CT scan thorax, 30(60.0%) patients had not done CT scan thorax and 32(64.0%) patients had Amoxiclav first line antibiotic and 18(36.0%) patients had Ceftriaxone first line antibiotic. Conclusions: Suitable antibiotics and prompt chest tube drainage is an effective method of treatment of childhood empyema, especially in resource-poor settings. Majority of the patients progress on this conservative management and have good recovery on follow up.  


CHEST Journal ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1030-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Whiting ◽  
Hendrick B. Barner ◽  
Phillip Leone ◽  
Edwin E. Westura

CHEST Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhak Kupfer ◽  
Chanaka Seneviratne ◽  
Kabu Chawla ◽  
Kavan Ramachandran ◽  
Sidney Tessler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document