Osteoporosis and Bone Density Measurement Methods

1991 ◽  
Vol &NA; (271) ◽  
pp. 149???163 ◽  
Author(s):  
SIMON J. OSTLERE ◽  
RICHARD H. GOLD
1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 457-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Torgerson ◽  
C Donaldson ◽  
D M Reid

Bone mineral density measurements have been criticized on the grounds that they are not a worth-while screening tool. In this paper we argue that bone mineral measurements can be an efficient diagnostic tool even if they are not of proven value for screening. There is complex relationship between the costs of a measurement, the intervention and the predictive value of the test all of which must be accounted for when assessing the value of a bone density measurement. For bone density measurements to be used for screening, a wider evaluation needs to be undertaken compared with that for their use as a diagnostic tool. We address some common objections, for example, that low compliance with screening would undermine efficiency, and show that these are not relevant. Evaluations of screening need to address issues that are likely to affect efficiency.


Bone ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Lu ◽  
J.N. Briody ◽  
R. Howman-Giles ◽  
A. Trube ◽  
C.T. Cowell

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Shogo Kanda ◽  
Yuji Ehara ◽  
Yoshiyuki Onishi ◽  
Yoshitomo Takaishi ◽  
Hidehito Yasumitsu ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Marshall ◽  
Trevor A. Sheldon ◽  
Egon Jonsson

AbstractThis study examined the conclusions of published reports that review the literature and make recommendations about appropriate applications of bone density measurement. It is based on a survey of 22 organizations producing such reports between 1986 and Spring 1995. Overall, the application of bone density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis was supported by 65% of reports, by 44% for the monitoring and follow-up of patients with previously diagnosed disease, and by 59% for monitoring and follow-up of patients receiving treatment that may affect their bone density. A smaller proportion of reports from government and public organizations compared with other types of organizations and a smaller proportion of reports using more rigorous methods supported the applications for bone density measurement identified in the survey. A larger proportion of the reports published after 1990 compared with those published between 1986 and 1990 support the applications of bone density measurement, with the exception of population screening. The results of this survey suggest that there is considerable disagreement about the potential applications of bone density measurement. Publicly funded organisations and those using more rigorous methods tended to be more conservative in their conclusions.


1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Speller ◽  
G J Royle ◽  
J A Harrocks

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Leslie ◽  
Lisa M. Lix ◽  
Helena Johansson ◽  
Anders Oden ◽  
Eugene McCloskey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document