EFFECT OF AN ANGIOTENSIN II ANTAGONIST IRBESARTAN ON BLOOD PRESSURE AND SKIN CAPILLARY DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. S25
Author(s):  
F Rattray ◽  
R Coltart ◽  
N Markandu ◽  
G A MacGregor ◽  
T FT Antonios
1983 ◽  
Vol 245 (6) ◽  
pp. H1013-H1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Takahashi ◽  
K. Takeda ◽  
H. Ashizawa ◽  
A. Inoue ◽  
S. Yoneda ◽  
...  

Central effects of hydrocortisone were investigated by injecting it intracerebroventricularly (icv) while recording blood pressure and heart rate in awake rats. Dose-dependent increases in both blood pressure and heart rate occurred following injections of hydrocortisone. Pretreatment by icv injections of the angiotensin II antagonist, [Sar1-Ile8]angiotensin II, completely abolished vasopressor responses to subsequent injections of hydrocortisone. When rats were later anesthetized with urethan to allow recording of abdominal sympathetic nerve activity, hydrocortisone produced vasopressor responses accompanied by corresponding increases in sympathetic nerve firing, which were also abolished by central pretreatment with either [Sar1-Ile8]angiotensin II or angiotensin I converting-enzyme inhibitor, captopril. These results indicate that centrally administered hydrocortisone stimulates the brain renin-angiotensin system to produce vasopressor responses by increasing sympathetic nerve firing.


1982 ◽  
Vol 63 (s8) ◽  
pp. 153s-156s ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Loudon ◽  
R. F. Bing ◽  
J. D. Swales ◽  
H. Thurston

1. To assess the relative importance of vascular as opposed to plasma renin, groups of conscious rats received a single intravenous injection of partially purified rat renin 18 h after bilateral nephrectomy. Blood pressure was monitored continuously and plasma and aortic renin concentrations were determined at 1, 3, 6 or 9 h after injection. In separate groups of rats the effect of the competitive angiotensin II antagonist, saralasin, on blood pressure was measured 3 or 6 h after renin injection. 2. Blood pressure remained elevated for up to 6 h after renin injection, returning to normal by 9 h. Saralasin infusion reversed the rise in blood pressure at both 3 and 6 h after injection. 3. Aortic renin concentration followed the pattern of the pressor response whereas plasma renin concentration had returned to subnormal values by 3 h. 4. Circulating renin of renal origin is taken up by aortic tissue. The pressor response to exogenous renin in rats after bilateral nephrectomy is not related to changes in plasma renin but is similar in duration to the persistence of aortic renin-like activity and can be blocked by saralasin at both 3 and 6 h after injection.


1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Sweet ◽  
Deborah C. Bradstreet ◽  
R. S. Berman ◽  
Nader Jallard ◽  
A. Saenz ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulah Alrifai ◽  
shadi Al Halabi ◽  
Robert Chait

Introduction: LCZ696 is a first-in-class inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and Neprilysin. The use of LCZ696 in Heart Failure is promising compared to ACEI or ARB. The use of LCZ696 for blood pressure has been studied but controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LCZ696 to ACEI/ARB for lowering systolic blood pressure effect. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of LCZ696 on systolic blood pressure in comparison to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/Angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB). Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane for prospective RCTs that compared LCZ696 versus ACEI or ARB in patients with established diagnosis of essential hypertension. Trials that included patients with essential hypertension with or without heart failure were randomized to either LCZ696 or ACEI or ARB, and that also reported at least one of the studied outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad score. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by Cochran’s Q statistics. Mean differences were calculated using the random effect model. Results: Three RCTs met our inclusion criteria and included 8996 patients who had mild-moderate essential hypertension and were between18-75 years. They were randomized to LCZ696 versus ACEI or ARB. The use of LCZ696 was associated with improved systolic blood pressure control when compared to the control group (MD -3.89; 95% CI -7.75, -0.04; P=0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the use of LCZ696 in hypertensive patients provides better reduction of blood pressure when compared to an ACEI or an ARB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document