The Effect of Advanced Life Support and Sophisticated Hospital Systems on Motor Vehicle Mortality

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAYMOND H. ALEXANDER ◽  
PETER T. PONS ◽  
JEFFREY KRISCHER ◽  
PATRICIA HUNT
1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
Raymond H. Alexander ◽  
Peter T. Pons ◽  
Jeffrey Krischer ◽  
Patricia Hunt

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Hipskind ◽  
JM Gren ◽  
DJ Barr

AbstractIntroduction:Patients refusing hospital transportation occurs in 5% to 25% of out-of-hospital calls. Little is known about these calls. This study was needed to determine the demographics, inherent risks, and timing of refused calls.Methods:This was a prospective review of all run sheets of patients who refused transportation were collected for a two month period. Demographic data and medical information was collected. Each run was placed into one of three categories of need for transport and further evaluation: 1) minimal; 2) moderate; and 3) definite. The Greater Elgin Area Mobile Intensive Care Program (GEA-MICP) based at Sherman Hospital in Elgin, Illinois, was the setting. The GEA-MICP is an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system comprised of 17 advanced life support (ALS) ambulance agencies servicing northeastern Illinois. Study subjects were all patients who refused transportation to a hospital by ALS ambulance during July 1993 and February 1994. Paramedics were required to complete a run sheet for all calls.Results:Overall, 30% (683 of2,270) of all runs resulted in refusal of transportation. Patients who most commonly refused transportation were asymptomatic, 11–40 years old and involved in a motor vehicle crash. They usually had no past medical history, normal vital signs, and a normal mental status. Patients generally signed for their own release after evaluation. The average time to arrival was 4.2 minutes and average time spent on scene by paramedics was 18.4 minutes. Of the patients, 72% were judged to have minimal need, 25% were felt to have a moderate need, and 3% were felt to definitely need transport to a hospital for further evaluation and/or treatment.Conclusion:There are many cases when EMS are activated, but transportation is refused. Most refusals occur after paramedic evaluation. Providing paramedics with primary care training and protocols would standardize care given to patients and provide a mechanism for discharge instructions and follow-up for those who chose not to be transported to a hospital. Patients judged to require further treatment had unique characteristics. These data may be useful in identifying potentially sicker patients allowing a concentrated effort to transport this subset of patients to a hospital.


1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 682 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. D. Reines ◽  
R. A. Bartlett ◽  
N. E. Chudy ◽  
K. R. Krigau ◽  
M. A. McKnew ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
H DAVID REINES ◽  
ROBERT L. BARTLETT ◽  
NANCY E. CHUDY ◽  
KARUNGARI R. KIRAGU ◽  
MARK A. McKNEW

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Joyce ◽  
Douglas E. Brown ◽  
Elizabeth A. Nelson

AbstractObjective:To describe the epidemiology of pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) practice in a large patient population from several geographic areas.Design:Retrospective computer analysis of EMS databases from four states using a common data set and analysis system.Setting:Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Nevada (except Clark County), 1990 through 1992.Methods:All patient-care reports of patients 14 years old and younger were extracted from the EMS databases and analyzed for the following factors: age, gender, date, elapsed pre-hospital times, incident type, mechanism of injury, call disposition, illness or injuries encountered, severity of illness/injury (by abnormal vital signs), and basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) treatment delivered.Results:A total of 1,512,907 patient care reports were reviewed. Those of 61,132 children were extracted for analysis. These children comprised about 4% of prehospital responses. Male subjects predominated (56%), and children aged 7 through 14 years represented 46% of cases. Most calls occurred in the evening and daylight hours. Children were transported by ambulance in 89% of cases, and care was refused in 7.7%. Mean response time was 9±16 minutes, mean scene time 12±14 minutes, and mean transport time 14±20 minutes. Traumatic incidents predominated at 42%, with motor vehicle accidents and falls the most common mechanisms. Blunt injuries accounted for 94% of trauma, whereas respiratory problems, seizures, and poisoning/overdose were the most common medical problems. Vital signs were obtained in 56% of cases. Abnormal vital signs were noted in 21% of these, and the presumptive causes were similar in distribution to those of the general population, with the addition of cardiac arrest. The most commonly used treatments were spinal immobilization, oxygen administration, intravenous access and several ALS medications. An ALS capability was available in more than half the runs, but ALS treatment was delivered in only 14% of those cases. Outcome data were not available.Conclusion:This multistate analysis of pediatric EMS epidemiology confirms findings reported in smaller regional studies, with several exceptions. Excessive scene times were not noted. Few children had serious disorders as evidenced by abnormal vital signs. An ALS treatment, when available, was used infrequently. These findings have implications for EMS planners and educators.


Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 2006-2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno Zaritsky ◽  
Vinay Nadkarni ◽  
Mary Fran Hazinski ◽  
George Foltin ◽  
Linda Quan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Catherine M. Groden ◽  
Erwin T. Cabacungan ◽  
Ruby Gupta

Objective The authors aim to compare all code blue events, regardless of the need for chest compressions, in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) versus the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We hypothesize that code events in the two units differ, reflecting different disease processes. Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of 107 code events using the code narrator, which is an electronic medical record of real-time code documentation, from April 2018 to March 2019. Events were divided into two groups, NICU and PICU. Neonatal resuscitation program algorithm was used for NICU events and a pediatric advanced life-support algorithm was used for PICU events. Events and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis. The Mann–Whitney test and linear regressions were done to compare the total code duration, time from the start of code to airway insertion, and time from airway insertion to end of code event. Results In the PICU, there were almost four times more code blue events per month and more likely to involve patients with seizures and no chronic condition. NICU events more often involved ventilated patients and those under 2 months of age. The median code duration for NICU events was 2.5 times shorter than for PICU events (11.5 vs. 29 minutes), even when adjusted for patient characteristics. Survival to discharge was not different in the two groups. Conclusion Our study suggests that NICU code events as compared with PICU code events are more likely to be driven by airway problems, involve patients <2 months of age, and resolve quickly once airway is taken care of. This supports the use of a ventilation-focused neonatal resuscitation program for patients in the NICU. Key Points


Author(s):  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Bernd W. Böttiger ◽  
Pierre Carli ◽  
Keith Couper ◽  
Charles D. Deakin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document