Epidemiology of Pediatric EMS Practice: A Multistate Analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Joyce ◽  
Douglas E. Brown ◽  
Elizabeth A. Nelson

AbstractObjective:To describe the epidemiology of pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) practice in a large patient population from several geographic areas.Design:Retrospective computer analysis of EMS databases from four states using a common data set and analysis system.Setting:Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Nevada (except Clark County), 1990 through 1992.Methods:All patient-care reports of patients 14 years old and younger were extracted from the EMS databases and analyzed for the following factors: age, gender, date, elapsed pre-hospital times, incident type, mechanism of injury, call disposition, illness or injuries encountered, severity of illness/injury (by abnormal vital signs), and basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) treatment delivered.Results:A total of 1,512,907 patient care reports were reviewed. Those of 61,132 children were extracted for analysis. These children comprised about 4% of prehospital responses. Male subjects predominated (56%), and children aged 7 through 14 years represented 46% of cases. Most calls occurred in the evening and daylight hours. Children were transported by ambulance in 89% of cases, and care was refused in 7.7%. Mean response time was 9±16 minutes, mean scene time 12±14 minutes, and mean transport time 14±20 minutes. Traumatic incidents predominated at 42%, with motor vehicle accidents and falls the most common mechanisms. Blunt injuries accounted for 94% of trauma, whereas respiratory problems, seizures, and poisoning/overdose were the most common medical problems. Vital signs were obtained in 56% of cases. Abnormal vital signs were noted in 21% of these, and the presumptive causes were similar in distribution to those of the general population, with the addition of cardiac arrest. The most commonly used treatments were spinal immobilization, oxygen administration, intravenous access and several ALS medications. An ALS capability was available in more than half the runs, but ALS treatment was delivered in only 14% of those cases. Outcome data were not available.Conclusion:This multistate analysis of pediatric EMS epidemiology confirms findings reported in smaller regional studies, with several exceptions. Excessive scene times were not noted. Few children had serious disorders as evidenced by abnormal vital signs. An ALS treatment, when available, was used infrequently. These findings have implications for EMS planners and educators.

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Hipskind ◽  
JM Gren ◽  
DJ Barr

AbstractIntroduction:Patients refusing hospital transportation occurs in 5% to 25% of out-of-hospital calls. Little is known about these calls. This study was needed to determine the demographics, inherent risks, and timing of refused calls.Methods:This was a prospective review of all run sheets of patients who refused transportation were collected for a two month period. Demographic data and medical information was collected. Each run was placed into one of three categories of need for transport and further evaluation: 1) minimal; 2) moderate; and 3) definite. The Greater Elgin Area Mobile Intensive Care Program (GEA-MICP) based at Sherman Hospital in Elgin, Illinois, was the setting. The GEA-MICP is an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system comprised of 17 advanced life support (ALS) ambulance agencies servicing northeastern Illinois. Study subjects were all patients who refused transportation to a hospital by ALS ambulance during July 1993 and February 1994. Paramedics were required to complete a run sheet for all calls.Results:Overall, 30% (683 of2,270) of all runs resulted in refusal of transportation. Patients who most commonly refused transportation were asymptomatic, 11–40 years old and involved in a motor vehicle crash. They usually had no past medical history, normal vital signs, and a normal mental status. Patients generally signed for their own release after evaluation. The average time to arrival was 4.2 minutes and average time spent on scene by paramedics was 18.4 minutes. Of the patients, 72% were judged to have minimal need, 25% were felt to have a moderate need, and 3% were felt to definitely need transport to a hospital for further evaluation and/or treatment.Conclusion:There are many cases when EMS are activated, but transportation is refused. Most refusals occur after paramedic evaluation. Providing paramedics with primary care training and protocols would standardize care given to patients and provide a mechanism for discharge instructions and follow-up for those who chose not to be transported to a hospital. Patients judged to require further treatment had unique characteristics. These data may be useful in identifying potentially sicker patients allowing a concentrated effort to transport this subset of patients to a hospital.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 984-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Niemi ◽  
Siobhan Geary ◽  
Mark Larrabee ◽  
Kevin R. Brown

Providing medications used in emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) in an efficient and consistent manner is a cornerstone for achieving excellent patient care and safety. For neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients who move through different specialty areas in a tertiary hospital, it is essential to have a standardized protocol for these medications that can be followed regardless of location or practitioner. Our institution developed a protocol for intravenous push (IVP) and continuous infusion (CI) medications based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) guidelines. This protocol incorporates these guidelines into a single reference sheet (Emergency Drug Sheet) based on the patient's weight using a computer software program. The program provides the option for either pediatric (weight-based) or adult (weight-based and standard dose) dosing. The CI section uses a limited number of concentrations, which meets the JCAHO mandate. Commercially available products are used, when possible, in response to USP <797>. It also serves as the standard protocol for vasoactive medications in all patient care settings in conjunction with programmable infusion pump technology. The software program is easy to use; the Emergency Drug Sheet is easy to read; and the program is available everywhere in the hospital. The standard CI protocol used with the Emergency Drug Sheet reduces unclear orders, standardizes drug preparation, and decreases the time to medication delivery. It could serve as a model for community hospitals, as well as tertiary facilities.


1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 682 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. D. Reines ◽  
R. A. Bartlett ◽  
N. E. Chudy ◽  
K. R. Krigau ◽  
M. A. McKnew ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
Raymond H. Alexander ◽  
Peter T. Pons ◽  
Jeffrey Krischer ◽  
Patricia Hunt

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAYMOND H. ALEXANDER ◽  
PETER T. PONS ◽  
JEFFREY KRISCHER ◽  
PATRICIA HUNT

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno Zaritsky ◽  
Vinay Nadkarni ◽  
Mary Fran Hazinski ◽  
George Foltin ◽  
Linda Quan ◽  
...  

This consensus document is an attempt to provide an organized method of reporting pediatric ALS data in out-of-hospital, emergency department, and in-hospital settings. For this methodology to gain wide acceptance, the task force encourages development of a common data set for both adult and pediatric ALS interventions. In addition, every effort should be made to ensure that consistent definitions are used in all age groups. As health care changes, we will all be challenged to document the effectiveness of what we currently do and show how new interventions or methods of treatment improve outcome and/or reduce cost. Only through collaborative research will we obtain the necessary data. For these reasons, and to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes, it is the hope of the task force that clinical researchers will follow the recommendations in this document. It is recognized that further refinements of this statement will be needed; these recommendations will improve only when researchers, clinicians, and EMS personnel use them, work with them, and modify them. Suggestions, emendations, and other comments aimed at improving the reporting of pediatric resuscitation should be sent to Arno Zaritsky, MD, Eastern virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughter, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 601 Children's Lane, Norfolk, VA 23507.


2018 ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Fullagar

Syncope has a number of worrisome potential etiologies and often prompts a basic life support (BLS) emergency medical services (EMS) crew to call for advanced life support (ALS). Pain management may be another valid reason to call for ALS. EMS, and emergency medicine in general, is tasked with evaluating and mitigating the most worrisome causes of a patient’s presentations even if those causes are not necessarily the most likely. ALS is indicated for many patients who have suffered a syncopal episode although astute BLS assessment and intervention may be all that are indicated in certain cases. The importance of BLS care is often minimized or overlooked in EMS but can have a significant effect on patient care if well implemented. The case demonstrates how well-applied BLS effectively managed this patient presenting with syncope and a painful fracture.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
H DAVID REINES ◽  
ROBERT L. BARTLETT ◽  
NANCY E. CHUDY ◽  
KARUNGARI R. KIRAGU ◽  
MARK A. McKNEW

CJEM ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Manos ◽  
David A. Petrie ◽  
Robert C. Beveridge ◽  
Stephen Walter ◽  
James Ducharme

ABSTRACTObjective:To determine the inter-observer agreement on triage assignment by first-time users with diverse training and background using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS).Methods:Twenty emergency care providers (5 physicians, 5 nurses, 5 Basic Life Support paramedics and 5 Advanced Life Support paramedics) at a large urban teaching hospital participated in the study. Observers used the 5-level CTAS to independently assign triage levels for 42 case scenarios abstracted from actual emergency department patient presentations. Case scenarios consisted of vital signs, mode of arrival, presenting complaint and verbatim triage nursing notes. Participants were not given any specific training on the scale, although a detailed one-page summary was included with each questionnaire. Kappa values with quadratic weights were used to measure agreement for the study group as a whole and for each profession.Results:For the 41 case scenarios analyzed, the overall agreement was significant (quadratic-weighted κ = 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.78). For all observers, modal agreement within one triage level was 94.9%. Exact modal agreement was 63.4%. Agreement varied by triage level and was highest for Level I (most urgent). A reasonably high level of intra- and inter-professional agreement was also seen.Conclusions:Despite minimal experience with the CTAS, inter-observer agreement among emergency care providers with different backgrounds was significant.


2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver F. Adunka ◽  
Bruce J. Gantz ◽  
Camille Dunn ◽  
Richard K. Gurgel ◽  
Craig A. Buchman

This article outlines new minimum standards for reporting adult cochlear implant outcomes. These standards have been endorsed by the Implantable Hearing Devices Committee and the Hearing Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. The lack of a standardized method for reporting outcomes following cochlear implantation in clinical trials has hampered the ability of investigators to draw comparisons across studies. Variability in data reported in articles and presentation formats inhibits meta-analyses, making it impossible to accumulate the large patient cohorts needed for statistically significant inference. While investigators remain unrestricted in publishing their adult cochlear implant outcome data in additional formats that they believe to be valuable, they should include the presently proposed minimal data set to facilitate interstudy comparability and consistency of reporting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document