DOES THE ADDITION OF HOME-BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING TO AEROBIC TRAINING MODIFY THE COMMON RISK FACTORS FOR CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IN A GROUP OF POST-MI PATIENTS REFERRED FOR CARDIAC REHABILITATION? 3:30 PM

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Susan Marzolini ◽  
Donald J. Mertens ◽  
Larry F. Hamm ◽  
Terence Kavanagh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Aerobic Training ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Common Risk Factors ◽  
The Common ◽  
Artery Disease

Effects of Resistance versus Aerobic Training on Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors

2003 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Banz ◽  
Margaret A. Maher ◽  
Warren G. Thompson ◽  
David R. Bassett ◽  
Wayne Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Aerobic Training ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Waist To Hip Ratio ◽  
Artery Disease

Individuals exhibiting “the metabolic syndrome” have multiple coronary artery disease risk factors, including insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and android obesity. We performed a randomized trial to compare the effects of aerobic and resistance training regimens on coronary risk factors. Twenty-six volunteers who exhibited android obesity and at least one other risk factor for coronary artery disease were randomized to aerobic or resistance training groups. Body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, glucose, insulin, body composition, 24-hr urinary albumin, fibrinogen, blood pressure, and lipid profile were measured at baseline and after 10 weeks of exercise training. Both groups showed a significant reduction in waist-to-hip ratio and the resistance training group also showed a reduction in total body fat. There was no significant change in mean arterial blood pressure in either group. Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were unchanged in both groups. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased (13%) with aerobic training only. Plasma fibrinogen was increased (28% and 34%, P < 0.02) in both groups and both groups showed a significant decrease (34% and 28%, P < 0.03) in microalbuminuria after their respective training regimen. In conclusion, resistance training was effective in improving body composition of middle-aged obese sedentary males. Only aerobic training was effective in raising HDL cholesterol. More studies are warranted to assess the effects of exercise on plasma fibrinogen and microalbuminuria.

scholarly journals Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Avila ◽  
Jomme Claes ◽  
Roselien Buys ◽  
May Azzawi ◽  
Luc Vanhees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
One Year

Background Home-based interventions might facilitate the lifelong uptake of a physically active lifestyle following completion of a supervised phase II exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Yet, data on the long-term effectiveness of home-based exercise training on physical activity and exercise capacity are scarce. Objective The purpose of the TeleRehabilitation in Coronary Heart disease (TRiCH) study was to compare the long-term effects of a short home-based phase III exercise programme with telemonitoring guidance to a prolonged centre-based phase III programme in coronary artery disease patients. The primary outcome was exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile and health-related quality of life. Methods Ninety coronary artery disease patients (80 men) were randomly assigned to 3 months of home-based (30), centre-based (30) or a control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis after completion of their phase II ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programme. Outcome measures were assessed at discharge of the phase II programme and after one year. Results Eighty patients (72 (91%) men; mean age 62.6 years) completed the one-year follow-up measurements. Exercise capacity and secondary outcomes were preserved in all three groups ( Ptime > 0.05 for all), irrespective of the intervention ( Pinteraction > 0.05 for all). Eighty-five per cent of patients met the international guidelines for physical activity ( Ptime < 0.05). No interaction effect was found for physical activity. Conclusion Overall, exercise capacity remained stable during one year following phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Our home-based exercise intervention was as effective as centre-based and did not result in higher levels of exercise capacity and physical activity compared to the other two interventions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942

Cardiac rehabilitation training program focused on risk factors of coronary artery disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. e110
Author(s):  
Robert Vysoký ◽  
Filip Dosbaba ◽  
Ladislav Batalik ◽  
Svatopluk Nehyba ◽  
Václav Chaloupka
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Rehabilitation Training ◽  
Artery Disease

Asymptomatic coronary artery disease in diabetes: relation to common risk factors, lipoproteins, apoproteins and apo E polymorphism

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Koistinen ◽  
H. V. Huikuri ◽  
U. -R. Korhonen ◽  
M. K. Linnaluoto ◽  
T. Kuusi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Apo E ◽  
Common Risk Factors ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease

scholarly journals Assessment of coronary artery disease patient eligibility to phase 3 cardiac rehabilitation in the outpatient settings after myocardial revascularization

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25
Author(s):  
O. Yu. Korennova ◽  
E. P. Prihodko ◽  
Yu. E. Yukhina ◽  
M. V. Savchenko ◽  
E. A. Turusheva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Rehabilitation Team ◽  
Exercise Rehabilitation ◽  
Artery Disease

Aim. To determine the clinical factors affecting the timely reference of patients with coronary artery disease after myocardial revascularization to Phase 3 cardiac rehabilitation.Methods. 773 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent myocardial revascularization were recruited in a study. Of them, 77 (9.96%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 696 (90.04%) underwent PCI. Within 1 month of discharge, patients were examined by a cardiologist in the outpatient hospital and then referred to the cardiac rehabilitation team to assess their eligibility. The eligibility for exercise rehabilitation was assessed based on the results of general examination, clinical and laboratory findings. The prevalence of absolute and relative contraindications to exercise rehabilitation was measured.Results. 10% of CAD patients after myocardial revascularization had absolute contraindications and 29.6% had relative contraindications to exercise rehabilitation. The presence of relative contraindications (exaggerated blood pressure response (>80/100 mm Hg) to exercise or a decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥20 mm Hg, ventricular extrasystole and tachycardia, paroxysmal tachyarrhythmias in response to exercise, active gastroduodenal ulcer, and less than 1 month after its exacerbation, moderate heart valvular disease (aortic stenosis), decompensated carbohydrate metabolism disorders) required the management of risk factors limiting patients on the participation in exercise rehabilitation. The routing of CAD patients after myocardial revascularization at Phase 3 cardiac rehabilitation was developed and introduced in the Clinical Cardiological Dispensary in the Omsk region.Conclusion. Most patients with CAD after myocardial revascularization should be referred to exercise rehabilitation. These patients rarely have absolute contraindications (about 10%). Despite relative contraindications are rather high (about 30%), risk factors limiting patient participation in exercise rehabilitation are managed successfully. Optimal routing of patients contributes to their prompt recruiting to cardiac rehabilitation. Effective management of cardiovascular risk factors allows recruiting more patients in exercise rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document