A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Tirilazad Mesylate in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
E C Haley ◽  
N F Kassell ◽  
C Apperson-Hansen ◽  
M H Maile ◽  
W M Alves
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Tirilazad Mesylate

Economic Analysis of Tirilazad Mesylate for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Economic Evaluation of a Phase III Clinical Trial in Europe and Australia

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Glick ◽  
Richard Willke ◽  
Daniel Polsky ◽  
Ted Llana ◽  
Wayne M. Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Tirilazad Mesylate ◽  
The Cost

AbstractThis study used data from a multinational phase III randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tirilazad mesylate (Freedox®) in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. In men, therapy with 6 mg/kg per day of tirilazad mesylate was associated with significantly increased survival, increased cost of care, and ratios of cost per death averted that compare favorably with the ratios of other life and death interventions. In women, it appeared to have no effects on costs or survival. Further clinical studies may provide additional information about the cost-effectiveness of this intervention.

A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in North America

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Clarke Haley ◽  
Neal F. Kassell ◽  
Carolyn Apperson-Hansen ◽  
Marie H. Maile ◽  
Wayne M. Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Vehicle Group ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Tirilazad Mesylate ◽  
Fine Print

✓ To test the safety and efficacy of tirilazad mesylate, a nonglucocorticoid 21-aminosteroid, in improving the outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), 902 patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial at 54 North American neurosurgical centers. Five patients were excluded prior to receiving any study drug. Of 897 patients who received at least one dose of study medication, 300 received a placebo containing a citrate vehicle, 298 received 2 mg/kg per day tirilazad, and 299 received 6 mg/kg per day tirilazad, all administered intravenously beginning within 48 hours of the SAH and continuing through 10 days posthemorrhage. All patients were also treated with orally administered nimodipine. At 3 months post-SAH, there were no significant differences (p < 0.025) among the groups with regard to mortality rate, favorable outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, or employment status. During the first 14 days after the SAH, there were no significant differences among the groups in the incidence or severity of clinically symptomatic or angiographically identifiable cerebral vasospasm. Mortality data stratified by gender and neurological grade on admission (assessed according to a modified World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale) demonstrated that the men with Grades IV to V had a 33% mortality rate in the vehicle group, 52% in the 2 mg/kg per day tirilazad group (p = 0.29), and 5% in the 6 mg/kg per day tirilazad group (p = 0.03). Tirilazad was well tolerated at both dose levels. Tirilazad mesylate at dosage levels of up to 6 mg/kg per day for 8 to 10 days following SAH did not improve the overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH in this trial. The differences in the efficacy of tirilazad in this trial and a previously reported trial in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, in which dosage levels of tirilazad of 6 mg/kg per day reduced mortality rates and increased good recovery, may be a result of differences in admission characteristics of the patients and/or differences in management protocols, including the use of anticonvulsant medications.

Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand

1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal F. Kassell ◽  
E. Clarke Haley ◽  
Carolyn Apperson-Hansen ◽  
Wayne M. Alves ◽  
_ _
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Focal Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Symptomatic Vasospasm ◽  
Tirilazad Mesylate ◽  
Fine Print

✓ Tirilazad mesylate, a nonglucocorticoid 21-aminosteroid, has been shown in experimental models to reduce vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to reduce infarct size from focal cerebral ischemia. To test whether treatment with tirilazad would reduce ischemic symptoms from vasospasm and improve overall outcome in patients with ruptured aneurysms, a prospective randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial was conducted at 41 neurosurgical centers in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. One thousand twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.6, 2, or 6 mg/kg per day of intravenously administered tirilazad or a placebo containing the citrate vehicle. All patients were also treated with intravenously administered nimodipine. Patients receiving 6 mg/kg per day of tirilazad had reduced mortality (p = 0.01) and a greater frequency of good recovery on the Glasgow Outcome Scale 3 months after SAH (p = 0.01) than similar patients treated with vehicle. There was a reduction in symptomatic vasospasm in the group that received 6 mg/kg per day tirilazad; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.048). The benefits of treatment with tirilazad were predominantly shown in men rather than in women. There were no material differences between the outcomes in the groups treated with 0.6 and 2 mg/kg tirilazad per day and the group treated with vehicle. Tirilazad was well tolerated at all three dose levels. These observations suggest that tirilazad mesylate, at a dosage of 6 mg/kg per day, is safe and improves overall outcome in patients (especially in men) who have experienced an aneurysmal SAH.

Abstract T P352: Dantrolene for the Prevention and Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Feasibility

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Muehlschlegel ◽  
Raphael Carandang ◽  
Wiley Hall ◽  
Kini Nisha ◽  
Saef Izzy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Outcome Differences ◽  
Infusion Period

Introduction: Dantrolene is neuroprotective in animal models and may attenuate cerebral vasospasm (cVSP) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans. We evaluated safety/tolerability and feasibility of intravenous dantrolene (IV-D) after aSAH. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 31 patients with acute aSAH were randomized to IV-D 1.25 mg IV every 6 hours x 7 days (n=16) or placebo (n=15). Primary endpoint was incidence of hyponatremia (sNa ≤ 134 mmol/L) and liver toxicity (% patients with ALT, AST and AlkPhos >5x upper limit of normal). Secondary safety endpoints included tolerability, systemic hypotension and intracranial hypertension. Efficacy was explored by clinical, transcranial Doppler (TCD) or angiographic cVSP occurrence, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and 3-month modified-Rankin-Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests, generalized estimating equations and mixed models. Results: Between IV-D vs. placebo, no differences were observed in the primary outcome (hyponatremia: 44% vs. 67% [p=0.29]; liver toxicity 6% vs. 0% [p=1.0]). Numerically more AEs and SAEs were seen in the IV-D group, but did not reach statistical significance (16 vs. 5 AEs, of which 5 vs. 2 were severe; RR 2.2; 95% CI 0.7-6.7; p=0.16). Three IV-D vs. two placebo patients reached stop criteria: one IV-D patient developed liver toxicity; two patients in each group developed brain edema requiring osmotherapy. No differences in angiographic, TCD, clinical cVSP, DCI, or 3-month functional outcomes were seen. Quantitative angiogram analysis revealed a trend towards increased vessel diameters in the IV-D group after the 7-day infusion-period (p=0.05). Conclusion: In this small trial, IV-Dantrolene after aSAH was feasible, tolerable and safe, but was underpowered to show efficacy or outcome differences.

Long-term effects of nimodipine on cerebral infarcts and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha Öhman ◽  
Antti Servo ◽  
Olli Heiskanen
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Cerebral Infarcts ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type

✓ A total of 213 patients with verified aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) of Grades I to III (Hunt and Hess classification) were enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of intravenous nimodipine on delayed ischemic deterioration and computerized tomography (CT)-visualized infarcts after SAH and surgery. The administration of the drug or matching placebo was started immediately after the radiological diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm had been made. Of the 213 patients enrolled in the study, 58 were operated on early (within 72 hours after the bleed: Days 0 to 3), 69 were operated on subacutely (between Days 4 and 7), and 74 had late surgery (on Day 8 or later). Eleven patients died before surgery was undertaken and one was not operated on. A follow-up examination with CT scanning, performed 1 to 3 years after the SAH (mean 1.4 years), revealed no significant differences in the overall outcome between the groups. However, nimodipine treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of deaths caused by delayed cerebral ischemia (p = 0.01) and significantly lower occurrence of cerebral infarcts visualized by CT scanning in the whole population (p = 0.05), especially in patients without an associated intracerebral hemorrhage on admission CT scan (p = 0.03).

Phase II trial of tirilazad in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 786-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Clarke Haley ◽  
Neal F. Kassell ◽  
Wayne M. Alves ◽  
Bryce K. A. Weir ◽  
Carolyn Apperson Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Focal Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Free Radical Scavenger ◽  
Radical Scavenger ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Tirilazad Mesylate

✓ Tirilazad mesylate, a 21-aminosteroid free-radical scavenger, has been shown to ameliorate cerebral vasospasm and reduce infarct size in animal models of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and focal cerebral ischemia. In preparation for performing large-scale clinical trials in humans with aneurysmal SAH, the safety of varying doses of tirilazad was tested in a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, sequential dose-escalation study at 12 Canadian neurosurgical centers. Two hundred forty-five patients with an aneurysmal SAH documented by angiography were enrolled in the study sequentially within 72 hours of hemorrhage. The patients were assigned to one of three dosage tiers: receiving 0.6 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, or 6 mg/kg tirilazad or vehicle per day intravenously in divided doses through Day 10 following the SAH. All patients also received oral nimodipine. No serious side effects of tirilazad treatment were identified at any of the three doses, despite close monitoring of hepatic and cardiac toxicity. A trend toward improvement in overall 3-month patient outcome was seen in the 2 mg/kg per day tirilazad-treated group compared to the outcomes in the vehicle-treated groups. We conclude that tirilazad mesylate is safe in SAH patients at doses up to 6 mg/kg per day for up to 10 days and is a promising drug for the treatment of patients with aneurysmal SAH.

scholarly journals Long-acting statin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1190-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Naraoka ◽  
Naoya Matsuda ◽  
Norihito Shimamura ◽  
Kenichiro Asano ◽  
Kenichi Akasaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Pleiotropic Effects ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Long Acting

Statins have pleiotropic effects that are considered beneficial in preventing cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Many studies using statins have been performed but failed to show remarkable effects. We hypothesized that a long-acting statin would be more effective, due to a longer half-life and stronger pleiotropic effects. Patients with aSAH were randomly assigned to a pitavastatin group (4 mg daily; n = 54) and a placebo group ( n = 54) after repair of a ruptured aneurysm. The primary efficacy end point was vasospasm-related delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DIND), and the secondary end points were cerebral vasospasm evaluated by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), vasospasm-related new cerebral infarctions, and outcome at three months. Severe cerebral vasospasms on DSA were statistically fewer in the pitavastatin group than in the placebo group (14.8% vs. 33.3%; odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.87, p = 0.042); however, the occurrence of DIND and new infarctions and outcome showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. The present study is the first to prove the definite, statin-induced amelioration of cerebral vasospasm on DSA. However, administration of any type of statin at the acute phase of aSAH is not recommended.

A phase II randomized controlled trial of tiopronin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359
Author(s):  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
Brandon Christophe ◽  
Samuel Bruce ◽  
Amanda M. Carpenter ◽  
Trae Robison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

OBJECTIVEDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a significant contributor to poor outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The neurotoxin 3-aminopropanal (3-AP) is upregulated in cerebral ischemia. This phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of tiopronin in reducing CSF 3-AP levels in patients with aSAH.METHODSIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, 60 patients were assigned to receive tiopronin or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Treatment was commenced within 96 hours after aSAH onset, administered at a dose of 3 g daily, and continued until 14 days after aSAH or hospital discharge, whichever occurred earlier. The primary efficacy outcome was the CSF 3-AP level at 7 ± 1 days after aSAH.RESULTSOf the 60 enrolled patients, 29 (97%) and 27 (93%) in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively, received more than one dose of the study drug or placebo. At post-aSAH day 7 ± 1, CSF samples were available in 41% (n = 12/29) and 48% (n = 13/27) of patients in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively. No difference in CSF 3-AP levels at post-aSAH day 7 ± 1 was observed between the study arms (11 ± 12 nmol/mL vs 13 ± 18 nmol/mL; p = 0.766). Prespecified adverse events led to early treatment cessation for 4 patients in the tiopronin arm and 2 in the placebo arm.CONCLUSIONSThe power of this study was affected by missing data. Therefore, the authors could not establish or refute an effect of tiopronin on CSF 3-AP levels. Additional observational studies investigating the role of 3-AP as a biomarker for DCI may be warranted prior to its use as a molecular target in future clinical trials.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01095731 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

scholarly journals Effect of Pregabalin on Perioperative Headache in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 438-443
Author(s):  
Karen Ruby Lionel ◽  
Manikandan Sethuraman ◽  
Mathew Abraham ◽  
Smita Vimala ◽  
Unnikrishnan Prathapadas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Daily Headache ◽  
Sedation Scores ◽  
Effective Adjunct

Abstract Background Patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) experience excruciating headache that is difficult to manage in resource-constrained settings. Pregabalin’s (β-isobutyl-GABA) analgesic, antiepileptic, and antiemetic properties make it an attractive adjuvant in pain management for these patients. Methods We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial on 40 aSAH patients undergoing aneurysmal clipping to assess the effect of perioperative pregabalin in decreasing perioperative headache, anesthetic, and opioid requirement. Patients received either pregabalin (75 mg) or placebo twice daily soon after admission till 24-hour postoperative, in addition to paracetamol 650 mg thrice daily. Headache assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at five time points was compared using a mixed effects regression model. Results Pain assessed by VAS declined significantly more from the baseline in pregabalin recipients compared with placebo at preinduction (–3.6 vs.–1.8; p = 0.004), 12-hour (4.3 vs. 2.8; p = 0.014), and 24-hour postsurgery (4.7 vs. 2.9; p = 0.007), but not at the 6-hour postoperation (4.9 vs. 3.8; p = 0.065). Pregabalin recipients required a lower minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane to maintain a prespecified bispectral index of 40 and 60 (0.8 vs. 0.9; p = 0.014) and required fewer rescue analgesic doses in the 24  hours following surgery (1.8 vs. 3.3; p = 0.005). The intraoperative fentanyl requirement was not significantly different between the groups (10 μg/kg vs. 11.4 μg/kg; p = 0.065). There was no significant difference in the sedation scores. Conclusions Pregabalin 75 mg administered twice daily, during the perioperative period, was an effective adjunct in the management of the severe headache experienced by patients with aSAH and decreased the opioid and anesthetic requirement without significantly increasing sedation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document