Economic Evaluation of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Very High-Risk Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Delorme ◽  
Stéphanie Badin ◽  
Anne-Gaelle G. Le Corroller ◽  
Anne Aurtignon Auvrignon ◽  
Marie-Françoise Auclerc ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1517-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Michel ◽  
J. Landman-Parker ◽  
M.F. Auclerc ◽  
C. Mathey ◽  
T. Leblanc ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ([G-CSF] lenogastrim) can increase the chemotherapy dose-intensity (CDI) delivered during consolidation chemotherapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven children with very high-risk ALL were randomized (slow early response to therapy, 55 patients; translocation t(9;22) or t(4;11), 12 patients). Consolidation consisted of six courses of chemotherapy; the first, third, and fifth courses were a combination of high-dose cytarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone (R3), whereas the second, fourth, and sixth courses included vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (COPADM). G-CSF was given after each course, and the next scheduled course was started as soon as neutrophil count was > 1 × 109/L and platelet count was > 100 × 109/L. CDI was calculated using the interval from day 1 of the first course to hematologic recovery after the fifth course (100% CDI = 105-day interval). RESULTS: CDI was significantly increased in the G-CSF group compared with the non–G-CSF group (mean ± 95% confidence interval, 105 ± 5% v 91 ± 4%; P < .001). This higher intensity was a result of shorter post-R3 intervals in the G-CSF group, whereas the post-COPADM intervals were not statistically reduced. After the R3 courses, the number of days with fever and intravenous antibiotics and duration of hospitalization were significantly decreased by G-CSF, whereas reductions observed after COPADM were not statistically significant. Duration of granulocytopenia was reduced in the G-CSF group, but thrombocytopenia was prolonged, and the number of platelet transfusions was increased. Finally, the 3-year probability of event-free survival was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: G-CSF can increase CDI in high-risk childhood ALL. Its effects depend on the chemotherapy regimen given before G-CSF administration. In our study, a higher CDI did not improve disease control.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1612-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Heath ◽  
Peter G. Steinherz ◽  
Arnold Altman ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
Suresh Jhanwar ◽  
...  

Purpose: To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematopoietic toxicities, supportive care requirements, time to complete intensive therapy, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL). Patients and Methods: A total of 287 children with HR-ALL were randomly assigned to intensive chemotherapy regimens (New York I [NY I] or NY II) as part of the Children’s Cancer Group (CCG)-1901 protocol. The induction phases consisted of five drugs (vincristine, prednisone, l-asparaginase, daunorubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Initial consolidation comprised six-agent chemotherapy combined with 18 Gy of total-brain irradiation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) during either induction or initial consolidation. A crossover study analysis was done on the 259 patients who completed both phases of therapy. Results: The mean time to neutrophil recovery (≥ 0.5 × 109/L) was reduced with G-CSF (16.7 v 19.1 days, P = .0003); however, patients who received G-CSF did not have significantly reduced episodes of febrile neutropenia (149 v 164, P = .41), positive blood cultures (57 v 61, P = .66), or serious infections (75 v 79, P = .62). Hospitalization (14.0 v 13.9 days, P = .87) and induction therapy completion times (NY I, 30.3 v 31.3 days, P = .11; NY II, 33.4 v 32.3 days, P = .40) were not significantly altered. There were no differences in 6-year EFS (P = .24) or OS (P = .54) between patients receiving or not receiving G-CSF on CCG-1901, NY I and NY II. Conclusion: Children with high-risk ALL do not appear to benefit from prophylactic G-CSF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document