scholarly journals 1531: PREVALENCE OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY AND ASSOCIATED FRACTURE RISK IN GERIATRIC TRAUMA PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 769-769
Author(s):  
Rajshri Joshi ◽  
Monisha Kumar ◽  
Taylor Kann ◽  
Jessica Krizo ◽  
Caroline Mangira ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 262 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello ◽  
Henry A. Feldman ◽  
Paul K. Kleinman ◽  
Susan A. Connolly ◽  
Rick A. Fair ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-259
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam ◽  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 560-563
Author(s):  
Dr Rohit Jain ◽  
Dr. AK Mathur ◽  
Dr. US Faujdar ◽  
Dr. Rahul Rajawat

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Hill ◽  
Terry J. Aspray

This review summarises aspects of vitamin D metabolism, the consequences of vitamin D deficiency, and the impact of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal health in older age. With age, changes in vitamin D exposure, cutaneous vitamin D synthesis and behavioural factors (including physical activity, diet and sun exposure) are compounded by changes in calcium and vitamin D pathophysiology with altered calcium absorption, decreased 25-OH vitamin D [25(OH)D] hydroxylation, lower renal fractional calcium reabsorption and a rise in parathyroid hormone. Hypovitaminosis D is common and associated with a risk of osteomalacia, particularly in older adults, where rates of vitamin D deficiency range from 10–66%, depending on the threshold of circulating 25(OH)D used, population studied and season. The relationship between vitamin D status and osteoporosis is less clear. While circulating 25(OH)D has a linear relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) in some epidemiological studies, this is not consistent across all racial groups. The results of randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation on BMD are also inconsistent, and some studies may be less relevant to the older population, as, for example, half of participants in the most robust meta-analysis were aged under 60 years. The impact on BMD of treating vitamin D deficiency (and osteomalacia) is also rarely considered in such intervention studies. When considering osteoporosis, fracture risk is our main concern, but vitamin D therapy has no consistent fracture-prevention effect, except in studies where calcium is coprescribed (particularly in frail populations living in care homes). As a J-shaped effect on falls and fracture risk is becoming evident with vitamin D interventions, we should target those at greatest risk who may benefit from vitamin D supplementation to decrease falls and fractures, although the optimum dose is still unclear.


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope J Robinson ◽  
Robin J Bell ◽  
Alfred Lanzafame ◽  
Catherine Kirby ◽  
Andrew Weekes ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom R. Hill ◽  
Terence J. Aspray ◽  
Roger M. Francis

The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence linking vitamin D to bone health outcomes in older adults. A plethora of scientific evidence globally suggests that large proportions of people have vitamin D deficiency and are not meeting recommended intakes. Older adults are at particular risk of the consequences of vitamin D deficiency owing to a combination of physiological and behavioural factors. Epidemiological studies show that low vitamin D status is associated with a variety of negative skeletal consequences in older adults including osteomalacia, reduced bone mineral density, impaired Ca absorption and secondary hyperparathyroidism. There seems to be inconsistent evidence for a protective role of vitamin D supplementation alone on bone mass. However, it is generally accepted that vitamin D (17·5 μg/d) in combination with Ca (1200 mg/d) reduces bone loss among older white subjects. Evidence for a benefit of vitamin D supplementation alone on reducing fracture risk is varied. According to a recent Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality review in the USA the evidence base shows mixed results for a beneficial effect of vitamin D on decreasing overall fracture risk. Limitations such as poor compliance with treatment, incomplete assessment of vitamin D status and large drop-out rates however, have been highlighted within some studies. In conclusion, it is generally accepted that vitamin D in combination with Ca reduces the risk of non-vertebral fractures particularly those in institutional care. The lack of data on vitamin D and bone health outcomes in certain population groups such as diverse racial groups warrants attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document