A3-01: Correlation of tumor response and survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin (PC) vs Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin plus Gemcitabine (PCG)

Background Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) reflect the neovascularization in the tumor mass. We therefore investigated the potential role of CEC kinetics after first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 45 healthy subjects and 51 naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. Quantification of CD146+ CECs was performed using immunomagnetic separation (IMS). Results Pretreatment and posttreatment CEC levels in NSCLC patients were significantly higher than in healthy subjects (p<0.0001). An objective response was achieved after chemotherapy with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) in 26 patients, whereas the remaining 25 patients had progressive disease (PD). Baseline CEC levels were significantly higher in PR/SD patients than in PD patients (p = 0.039). After chemotherapy, CEC count significantly decreased in PR/SD patients (p = 0.014) and increased in patients with PD (p = 0.019). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the percentage change of CEC counts between the 2 groups (p = 0.0016). No significant difference in the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was observed between patients with high baseline CEC counts and those with low baseline CEC levels. However, patients with high percentage change in CEC count had longer OS than those with low percentage change after chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Conclusions Changes in CEC counts after chemotherapy reflect tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients. Moreover, high percentage changes in CEC counts after chemotherapy may predict longer OS in advanced NSCLC. High baseline CEC levels might be an indicator of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients after first-line chemotherapy.

Download Full-text

Correlation of tumor response and survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus gemcitabine (PCG)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.7650 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 7650-7650

Author(s):

A. Paccagnella ◽

F. Oniga ◽

A. Bearz ◽

A. Favaretto ◽

F. Barbieri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Survival ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Cox Model ◽

Early Death ◽

Survival Difference ◽

The Difference ◽

Similar Survival ◽

Cox Analysis ◽

Nsclc Patients

7650 Background: We showed that PCG significantly increases both response rate (RR) (43.6% vs 20%) and median survival (10.8 mo vs 8.3 mo) over PC and that at Cox analysis, the only independent prognostic factors were PS and treatment (Paccagnella et al, J Clin Oncol 2006;24: 681–687). According to the Prentice criteria (Stat Med 1989;8: 431–440), to directly relate response and survival it is necessarily that responding patients (and non responding) of both arms have a similar survival and that the survival difference between the two arms disappear when the response factor is included in the multivariate analysis. Methods: Out of 324 pts included in the original analysis, 26 pts were not evaluable for response (early death, toxicity, refusal) before the planned response evaluation at two months and were excluded (15 pts from PC arm and 11 pts from PCG arm). The analysis however was also performed considering the non evaluable patients as non responders. Results: Overall, Responder patients had a median Survival that nearly doubled that of no responders: 14.73 mo vs 7.67 mo (HR: 0.49; CI: 0.31–0.54; P=0.000). No responder pts from PC and PCG arms had a similar survival (median 7.53 mo and 8.07 mo respectively; P= 0.96) as well as responder (CR + PR) patients (median 14.13 mo and 15.40 mo respectively; P=0.38). The principal difference between the two arms was that more than the double of patients in PCG arm responded (43.6% vs 20%) and consequently had a survival advantage of clinical relevance in comparison to patients in PC arm. When tumor response was introduced in the Cox model (as a four level variable), the difference in Overall Survival between PCG and PC changed from a significant level (HR=1.28; CI 1.00–1.63; P=0.049) to a not significant level (HR=0.99; CI: 0.76 - 1.28; P=0.97). Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first report showing a significant direct correlation between response and survival in advanced NSCLC according to Prentice criteria. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Circulating immune-profile as predictor of outcome in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e14514 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14514-e14514

Author(s):

Marcello Tiseo ◽

Michele Veneziani ◽

Francesco Gelsomino ◽

Sebastiano Buti ◽

Francesco Facchinetti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lymphocyte Subsets ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Squamous Carcinoma ◽

Absolute Number ◽

Facs Analysis ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Cd8 Cells ◽

And Function ◽

Nsclc Patients

e14514 Background: Detection of predictive markers of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies activity is of pivotal interest in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to identify a circulating immuno-profile as predictor of outcome in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab Methods: A peripheral blood immuno-profile evaluation was performed at baseline (T0), after 2 (T1) and 4 cycles (T2) of bi-weekly nivolumab in advanced pre-treated NSCLC patients from two Italian Institutions. First tumor assessment was performed after 4 cycles and then every 2 months. FACS analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations [CD3, CD4, CD8, NK (CD56), Treg (FOXP3) and MDSC] was performed. Absolute and % changes of lymphocyte subsets together with their functional and proliferative activity were assessed. Quali-quantitative leucocyte composition at baseline and its variation during therapy were correlated with tumor response and survival. Results: In the overall population of 54 treated patients, baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio and NK count, lymphocyte count and CD4 variations during therapy showed a statistically significant prognostic role (p < 0.001; p = 0.012; p < 0.001; p = 0.010, respectively). Among 31 patients (squamous carcinoma, n = 17; adenocarcinoma, n = 14) in which all 3 time-points samples were available, 19 were responders (response and stable disease) and 12 non-responders. In responders, absolute numbers of total NK and NKCD56dim subset were higher at baseline and their increase between T0 and T1 was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Responders also displayed increased cytotoxic capability as shown by a higher baseline expression of CD3ζ, perforin and granzyme in NKCD56dim subset. No significant variation was documented in absolute number and functional activity of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. A higher percentage of CD8+PD-1+ cells at baseline was observed in responders, while non-responders showed a statistically significant increase in the absolute number of MDSC during therapy (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The number and function of NKs and the frequency of PD-1 expression in CD8+ cells could represent predictive peripheral immuno-biomarkers for nivolumab treatment in advanced NSCLC.

Download Full-text