scholarly journals Patterns of Opioid Utilization in Pregnancy in a Large Cohort of Commercial Insurance Beneficiaries in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 1216-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Bateman ◽  
Sonia Hernandez-Diaz ◽  
James P. Rathmell ◽  
John D. Seeger ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There are few data regarding the utilization of opioids during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to define the prevalence and patterns of opioid use in a large cohort of pregnant women who were commercial insurance beneficiaries. Methods: Data for the study were derived from a deidentified research database of women from across the United States who had both medical and prescription benefits. By using diagnostic codes, the authors defined a cohort of 534,500 women with completed pregnancies who were enrolled in a commercial insurance plan from 6 months before pregnancy through delivery. Results: Overall, 76,742 women (14.4%) were dispensed an opioid at some point during pregnancy. There were 30,566 women (5.7%) dispensed an opioid during the first trimester, 30,434 women (5.7%) during the second trimester, and 34,906 women (6.5%) during the third trimester. Of these, 11,747 women (2.2%) were dispensed opioids three or more times during pregnancy. The most commonly dispensed opioids during pregnancy were hydrocodone (6.8%), codeine (6.1%), and oxycodone (2.0%). The prevalence of exposure at anytime during pregnancy decreased slightly during the study period from 14.9% for pregnancies that delivered in 2005 to 12.9% in 2011. The prevalence of exposure varied significantly by region and was lowest in the Northeast and highest in the South. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that opioids are very common exposures during pregnancy. Given the small and inconsistent body of literature on their safety in pregnancy, these findings suggest a need for research in this area.

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Bateman ◽  
Sonia Hernandez-Diaz ◽  
James P. Rathmell ◽  
John D. Seeger ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
B.T. Bateman ◽  
S. Hernandez-Diaz ◽  
J.P. Rathmell ◽  
J.D. Seeger ◽  
M. Doherty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Loreen Straub ◽  
Krista F. Huybrechts ◽  
Sonia Hernandez‐Diaz ◽  
Yanmin Zhu ◽  
Seanna Vine ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 152715442198999
Author(s):  
Caroline K. Darlington ◽  
Peggy A. Compton ◽  
Sadie P. Hutson

The rising prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among those living in the United States has demanded a collaborative response from health care and policy spheres. Addressing OUD among pregnant women is especially difficult, given the controversies surrounding the medical and ethical balance between meeting maternal versus fetal/newborn needs. Most medical organizations discourage the criminalization of drug use in pregnancy due to the adverse public health outcomes of such an approach. Despite this recommendation, many states continue to use punitive law to address drug use in pregnancy. In 2014, the Fetal Assault Law in Tennessee (TN) became the first law in the United States to directly allow women to be prosecuted for drug use in pregnancy. Since its expiration in 2016, this law has been re-introduced several times to the TN legislature in support of permanent implementation. This article outlines the impact of the initial Fetal Assault Law on maternal/newborn health in TN and provides alternative immediate, short-term, and long-term health policy strategies through which health care providers and legislators can better advocate for the well-being of both mothers with OUD and their infants.


Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Ventura ◽  
William D. Mosher ◽  
Sally C. Curtin ◽  
Joyce C. Abma ◽  
Stanley Henshaw

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-577
Author(s):  
Eula P. Tetangco ◽  
Supannee Rassameehiran ◽  
George Tan ◽  
Humberto Sifuentes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document