Prediction Model for In-hospital Mortality Should Accurately Predict the Risks of Patients Who Are Truly at Risk

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teus H. Kappen ◽  
Jonathan P. Wanderer ◽  
Linda M. Peelen ◽  
Karel G. M. Moons ◽  
Jesse M. Ehrenfeld
Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Schuijt ◽  
D.P.J. Smeeing ◽  
R.H.H. Groenwold ◽  
D. van der Velde ◽  
M.J. Weaver

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a condition that most commonly occurs in patients with pre-existing valve disease. It affects one in 30 000 people in the UK and is associated with a high mortality rate (15–30% in hospital mortality). Nurses working in the cardiac arena should be aware of those patients who are at risk of developing IE and its clinical management. This chapter covers the aetiology, diagnosis, complications, treatment, nursing considerations, and specific educational issues that are relevant to the overall management and prevention of IE.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Chen ◽  
Qinghua Zheng ◽  
Shuguang Ji ◽  
Feng Tian ◽  
Haiping Zhu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-416
Author(s):  
Hyla-Louise Kluyts ◽  
Wilhelmina Conradie ◽  
Estie Cloete ◽  
Sandra Spijkerman ◽  
Oliver Smith ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (7) ◽  
pp. 782-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duo Xu ◽  
Ruo-Chi Zhao ◽  
Wen-Hui Gao ◽  
Han-Bin Cui

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e003451
Author(s):  
Arjun Chandna ◽  
Rainer Tan ◽  
Michael Carter ◽  
Ann Van Den Bruel ◽  
Jan Verbakel ◽  
...  

IntroductionEarly identification of children at risk of severe febrile illness can optimise referral, admission and treatment decisions, particularly in resource-limited settings. We aimed to identify prognostic clinical and laboratory factors that predict progression to severe disease in febrile children presenting from the community.MethodsWe systematically reviewed publications retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase between 31 May 1999 and 30 April 2020, supplemented by hand search of reference lists and consultation with an expert Technical Advisory Panel. Studies evaluating prognostic factors or clinical prediction models in children presenting from the community with febrile illnesses were eligible. The primary outcome was any objective measure of disease severity ascertained within 30 days of enrolment. We calculated unadjusted likelihood ratios (LRs) for comparison of prognostic factors, and compared clinical prediction models using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). Risk of bias and applicability of studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool.ResultsOf 5949 articles identified, 18 studies evaluating 200 prognostic factors and 25 clinical prediction models in 24 530 children were included. Heterogeneity between studies precluded formal meta-analysis. Malnutrition (positive LR range 1.56–11.13), hypoxia (2.10–8.11), altered consciousness (1.24–14.02), and markers of acidosis (1.36–7.71) and poor peripheral perfusion (1.78–17.38) were the most common predictors of severe disease. Clinical prediction model performance varied widely (AUROC range 0.49–0.97). Concerns regarding applicability were identified and most studies were at high risk of bias.ConclusionsFew studies address this important public health question. We identified prognostic factors from a wide range of geographic contexts that can help clinicians assess febrile children at risk of progressing to severe disease. Multicentre studies that include outpatients are required to explore generalisability and develop data-driven tools to support patient prioritisation and triage at the community level.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019140542.


Author(s):  
Rik J.B. Loymans ◽  
Persijn J. Honkoop ◽  
Evelien H. Termeer ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Endo ◽  
Heather J. Baer ◽  
Masashi Nagao ◽  
Michael J. Weaver

Author(s):  
Belinda A Mohr ◽  
Diane Bartos ◽  
Stephen Dickson ◽  
Libby Bucsi ◽  
Mariska Vente ◽  
...  

Aim: This study estimates the costs and outcomes pre- versus post-implementation of an early deterioration detection solution (EDDS), which assists in identifying patients at risk of clinical decline. Materials & methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted to assess average costs per discharge, length of stay (LOS), complications, in-hospital mortality and 30-day all-cause re-admissions pre- versus post-implementation of an EDDS. Results: Average costs per discharge were significantly reduced by 18% (US$16,201 vs $13,304; p  = 0.007). Average LOS was also significantly reduced (6 vs 5 days; p  = 0.033), driven by a reduction in general care LOS of 1 day (p  = 0.042). Complications, in-hospital mortality and 30-day all-cause re-admissions were similar. Conclusion: Costs and LOS were lower after implementation of an EDDS for general care patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document