scholarly journals Ipsilateral and Simultaneous Comparison of Responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Réka Nemes ◽  
Szabolcs Lengyel ◽  
György Nagy ◽  
David R. Hampton ◽  
Martyn Gray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Potentials ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Tracheal Extubation ◽  
Neuromuscular Monitoring ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Fiber Optic Cable ◽  
Adductor Pollicis Muscle ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Neuromuscular Responses ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background The paucity of easy-to-use, reliable objective neuromuscular monitors is an obstacle to universal adoption of routine neuromuscular monitoring. Electromyography (EMG) has been proposed as the optimal neuromuscular monitoring technology since it addresses several acceleromyography limitations. This clinical study compared simultaneous neuromuscular responses recorded from induction of neuromuscular block until recovery using the acceleromyography-based TOF-Watch SX and EMG-based TetraGraph. Methods Fifty consenting patients participated. The acceleromyography and EMG devices analyzed simultaneous contractions (acceleromyography) and muscle action potentials (EMG) from the adductor pollicis muscle by synchronization via fiber optic cable link. Bland–Altman analysis described the agreement between devices during distinct phases of neuromuscular block. The primary endpoint was agreement of acceleromyography- and EMG-derived normalized train-of-four ratios greater than or equal to 80%. Secondary endpoints were agreement in the recovery train-of-four ratio range less than 80% and agreement of baseline train-of-four ratios between the devices. Results Acceleromyography showed normalized train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% earlier than EMG. When acceleromyography showed train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% (n = 2,929), the bias was 1.3 toward acceleromyography (limits of agreement, –14.0 to 16.6). When EMG showed train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% (n = 2,284), the bias was –0.5 toward EMG (–14.7 to 13.6). In the acceleromyography range train-of-four ratio less than 80% (n = 2,802), the bias was 2.1 (–16.1 to 20.2), and in the EMG range train-of-four ratio less than 80% (n = 3,447), it was 2.6 (–14.4 to 19.6). Baseline train-of-four ratios were higher and more variable with acceleromyography than with EMG. Conclusions Bias was lower than in previous studies. Limits of agreement were wider than expected because acceleromyography readings varied more than EMG both at baseline and during recovery. The EMG-based monitor had higher precision and greater repeatability than acceleromyography. This difference between monitors was even greater when EMG data were compared to raw (nonnormalized) acceleromyography measurements. The EMG monitor is a better indicator of adequate recovery from neuromuscular block and readiness for safe tracheal extubation than the acceleromyography monitor. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 880-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn S. Murphy ◽  
Joseph W. Szokol ◽  
Michael J. Avram ◽  
Steven B. Greenberg ◽  
Torin D. Shear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Spontaneous Recovery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Tracheal Extubation ◽  
Neuromuscular Function ◽  
Neuromuscular Monitoring ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is required to ensure neuromuscular function has recovered completely at the time of tracheal extubation. The TOFscan (Drager Technologies, Canada) is a new three-dimensional acceleromyography device that measures movement of the thumb in multiple planes. The aim of this observational investigation was to assess the agreement between nonnormalized and normalized train-of-four values obtained with the TOF-Watch SX (Organon, Ireland) and those obtained with the TOFscan during recovery from neuromuscular blockade. Methods Twenty-five patients were administered rocuronium, and spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular blockade was allowed to occur. The TOFscan and TOF-Watch SX devices were applied to opposite arms. A preload was applied to the TOF-Watch SX, and calibration was performed before rocuronium administration. Both devices were activated, and train-of-four values were obtained every 15 s. Modified Bland–Altman analyses were conducted to compare train-of-four ratios measured with the TOFscan to those measured with the TOF-Watch SX (when train-of-four thresholds of 0.2 to 1.0 were achieved). Results Bias and 95% limits of agreement between the TOF-Watch SX and the TOFscan at nonnormalized train-of-four ratios between 0.2 and 1.0 were 0.021 and −0.100 to 0.141, respectively. When train-of-four measures with the TOF-Watch SX were normalized, bias and 95% limits of agreement between the TOF-Watch SX and the TOFscan at ratios between 0.2 and 1.0 were 0.015 and −0.097 to 0.126, respectively. Conclusions Good agreement between the TOF-Watch SX with calibration and preload application and the uncalibrated TOFscan was observed throughout all stages of neuromuscular recovery.

scholarly journals A Comparison Between the Adductor Pollicis Muscle and the Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscle Using Electromyography AF-201P in Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: A Prospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Iwasaki ◽  
Hanae Sato ◽  
Shunichi Takagi ◽  
Osamu Kitajima ◽  
Sarah Kyuragi Luthe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Adductor Pollicis ◽  
Adductor Pollicis Muscle ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Abductor Digiti Minimi ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Intravenous General Anesthesia ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract Background The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. Methods Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to first reappearance of TOF response (first TOF), time from first PTC to first TOF (PTC-TOF time), time to reappearance of TOF counts of 2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time for appearance of the first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (32.4 ± 13.1min vs 24.4 ± 11.4min, p = 0.006). Interval time between the first PTC and the first TOF was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3min vs 12.4 ± 10.6min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOF counts of 2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland-Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. Conclusions The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG. Trial registration : UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000044904). Registered 19 July 2021 -Retrospectively registered,

Temporal Relation between Acoustic and Force Responses at the Adductor Pollicis during Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Block

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 646-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bellemare ◽  
Jacques Couture ◽  
François Donati ◽  
Benoît Plaud
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Mechanical Response ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Adductor Pollicis ◽  
Adductor Pollicis Muscle ◽  
Palmar Surface ◽  
Force Relaxation ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Acoustic Myography

Background Contracting muscle emits sounds. The purpose of this study was to compare the time course of muscular paralysis at the adductor pollicis muscle (AP) with use of acoustic myography and mechanomyography. Methods Thirteen elective surgery patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, received rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg intravenously) as a bolus dose during general anesthesia. Force of AP was measured with use of a strain gauge, and sounds were recorded simultaneously with use of a small condenser microphone fixed on the palmar surface of the hand over the AP. Supramaximal stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve at 0.1 Hz for 45-60 min. In seven patients, the response to train-of-four stimulation was also recorded during recovery. Results Force and sounds both were equally sensitive in measuring maximum block. The relation between sound and force was curvilinear, with good agreement near 0 and 100% and acoustic response exceeding mechanical response at intermediate levels of block. The acoustic signal had a slower onset and a faster recovery than the force response. The fade response of sound to train-of-four stimulation also recovered faster than that of force. Conclusion Acoustic myography is an alternative method to monitor muscular paralysis that is easy to set up and applicable to most superficial muscles. However, the time course of relaxation at AP using acoustic myography differs from the time course of force relaxation. Therefore, these two methods are not equivalent when applied to AP.

scholarly journals Reversal of Partial Neuromuscular Block and the Ventilatory Response to Hypoxia

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne J. L. Broens ◽  
Martijn Boon ◽  
Chris H. Martini ◽  
Marieke Niesters ◽  
Monique van Velzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventilatory Response ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Concentration ◽  
Neuromuscular Blocking ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Hypoxic Ventilatory Response ◽  
Adductor Pollicis Muscle ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Ventilatory Response To Hypoxia

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background The ventilatory response to hypoxia is a life-saving chemoreflex originating at the carotid bodies that is impaired by nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. This study evaluated the effect of three strategies for reversal of a partial neuromuscular block on ventilatory control in 34 healthy male volunteers on the chemoreflex. The hypothesis was that the hypoxic ventilatory response is fully restored following the return to a train-of-four ratio of 1. Methods In this single-center, experimental, randomized, controlled trial, ventilatory responses to 5-min hypoxia (oxygen saturation, 80 ± 2%) and ventilation at hyperoxic isohypercapnia (end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, 55 mmHg) were obtained at baseline, during rocuronium-induced partial neuromuscular block (train-of-four ratio of 0.7 measured at the adductor pollicis muscle by electromyography), and following reversal until the train-of-four ratio reached unity with placebo (n = 12), 1 mg neostigmine/0.5 mg atropine (n = 11), or 2 mg/kg sugammadex (n = 11). Results This study confirmed that low-dose rocuronium reduced the ventilatory response to hypoxia from 0.55 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.31 ± 0.21 l · min−1 · %−1 (train-of-four ratio, 0.7; P < 0.001). Following full reversal as measured at the thumb, there was persistent residual blunting of the hypoxic ventilatory response (0.45 ± 0.16 l · min−1 · %−1; train-of-four ratio, 1.0; P < 0.001). Treatment effect was not significant (analysis of covariance, P = 0.299) with chemoreflex impairment in 5 (45%) subjects following sugammadex reversal, in 7 subjects (64%) following neostigmine reversal, and in 10 subjects (83%) after spontaneous reversal to a train-of-four ratio of 1. Conclusions Despite full reversal of partial neuromuscular block at the thumb, impairment of the peripheral chemoreflex may persist at train-of-four ratios greater than 0.9 following reversal with neostigmine and sugammadex or spontaneous recovery of the neuromuscular block.

Current Status of Neuromuscular Reversal and Monitoring

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorin J. Brull ◽  
Aaron F. Kopman
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Tracheal Extubation ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Clinical Evaluations ◽  
Objective Monitoring ◽  
Respiratory Parameters ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Residual Neuromuscular Block

Abstract Postoperative residual neuromuscular block has been recognized as a potential problem for decades, and it remains so today. Traditional pharmacologic antagonists (anticholinesterases) are ineffective in reversing profound and deep levels of neuromuscular block; at the opposite end of the recovery curve close to full recovery, anticholinesterases may induce paradoxical muscle weakness. The new selective relaxant-binding agent sugammadex can reverse any depth of block from aminosteroid (but not benzylisoquinolinium) relaxants; however, the effective dose to be administered should be chosen based on objective monitoring of the depth of neuromuscular block. To guide appropriate perioperative management, neuromuscular function assessment with a peripheral nerve stimulator is mandatory. Although in many settings, subjective (visual and tactile) evaluation of muscle responses is used, such evaluation has had limited success in preventing the occurrence of residual paralysis. Clinical evaluations of return of muscle strength (head lift and grip strength) or respiratory parameters (tidal volume and vital capacity) are equally insensitive at detecting neuromuscular weakness. Objective measurement (a train-of-four ratio greater than 0.90) is the only method to determine appropriate timing of tracheal extubation and ensure normal muscle function and patient safety.

scholarly journals Is the Performance of Acceleromyography Improved with Preload and Normalization?

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1261-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casper Claudius ◽  
Lene Theil Skovgaard ◽  
Jørgen Viby-Mogensen
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
The Mean

Background Many studies have indicated that acceleromyography and mechanomyography cannot be used interchangeably. To improve the agreement between the two methods, it has been suggested to use a preload and to refer all train-of-four (TOF) ratios to the control TOF (normalization) when using acceleromyography. The first purpose of this study was to test whether a preload applied to acceleromyography would increase the precision and the agreement with mechanomyography. The second purpose was to evaluate whether normalization would improve the agreement with mechanomyography. Methods Sixty patients were randomized to acceleromyography with or without a preload (Hand Adapter; Organon, Oss, the Netherlands). On the contralateral arm, mechanomyography was used. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and an opioid, and neuromuscular block with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. The precision and the bias and limits of agreement (with or without normalization) between the methods were evaluated using TOF stimulation. Results Preload improved the precision of acceleromyography by 21%, but it also increased the mean control TOF ratio from 1.07 to 1.13. Normalization of the acceleromyographic TOF ratios diminished the bias to mechanomyography during recovery (e.g., from 0.15 to 0.05 at TOF 0.90); when the mechanomyographic TOF values were normalized as well, the bias was eliminated. However, normalization did not exclude wide individual differences between acceleromyography and mechanomyography (+/- 0.10-0.20 at TOF 0.90). Conclusion Preload increases the precision of acceleromyography, and normalization of the TOF ratios decreases bias in relation to mechanomyography. When both acceleromyography and mechanomyography are normalized, there is no significant bias between the two methods.

Residual Neuromuscular Block in HIV-Infected Young Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruixue hou ◽  
Liangyu wu ◽  
Yadong liu ◽  
Fangfang miao ◽  
Cheng yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Neuromuscular Block ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Infected Group ◽  
Normal Group ◽  
Postanesthesia Care Unit ◽  
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Train Of Four

Abstract Objectives: Avoidance of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) is crucial to decrease anesthesia-related pulmonary complications. At present, no data are available for HIV-infected patients about the occurrence of RNMB. In this trial, we aim to investigate the incidence of RNMB in such patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on 45 normal and 45 HIV-infected patients (18-65 yr). The train-of-four stimulation (TOF-Watch SX) was used to evaluate the level of neuromuscular block from the induction of anesthesia to back to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) by an assessor, but blind to the anesthesiologist. Primary endpoint was the presence of RNMB at PACU admission, defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio < 0.9. The onset time (from application of cisatracurium to maximum depression of T1), no reaction time (from zero of T1 to non-zero), and clinical duration (from application to 25% recovery of T1) were determined for each patient. Results: The incidence of RNMB was 37.5% in HIV- infected patients and 32.5% in normal patients (difference, 5%; 99% CI, −16% to 26 1%; p=0.815). The onset time was no different between two groups (4.05±0.88 min in HIV-infected group vs. 3.85±1.08 min in normal group (p=0.37)). The no reaction time was also similarly between two groups ( 49.83±3.81min in HIV-infected group vs. 48.98±5.12min in normal group (p=0.40)). The clinical duration was 53.78±3.05 min and 52.40±5.02 min in HIV-infected group and normal group, respectively (p=0.14). Conclusion: The odds of RNMB were not significantly different in HIV-infected young patients compared to normal persons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document