Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Aniket A. Saoji ◽  
Kanthaiah Koka ◽  
Leonid M. Litvak ◽  
Charles C. Finley
2002 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 2220-2221
Author(s):  
Emily A. Tobey ◽  
Michael D. Devous ◽  
Peter S. Roland

2002 ◽  
Vol 111 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne S. Sininger ◽  
Patricia Trautwein

Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a term used to describe an auditory disorder in which there is evidence of normal outer hair cell function (otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonics) and poor function of the auditory nerve (absent or highly distorted auditory brain stem response starting with wave I). Many of these patients have evidence of generalized peripheral nerve disease, leading to an assumption that the peripheral portion of the auditory nerve is the most likely site of lesion. A small group of these patients has received cochlear implants, and the majority of them achieve average to above-average performance. Although this outcome may seem incongruous with neural disease, average performance by patients with AN may be a result of the reintroduction of neural synchrony by electrical stimulation and/or the fact that most deaf patients have poor nerve survival. Although cochlear implants are promising for deaf patients with AN, more study of the disorder is needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1174-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karyn L. Galvin ◽  
Roghayeh Abdi ◽  
Richard C. Dowell ◽  
Bryony Nayagam

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 140-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Hoshino ◽  
Agustina Echegoyen ◽  
Maria Goffi-Gomez ◽  
Robinson Tsuji ◽  
Ricardo Bento

Introduction Usher syndrome (US) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by hearing loss and progressive visual impairment. Some deaf Usher syndrome patients learn to communicate using sign language. During adolescence, as they start losing vision, they are usually referred to cochlear implantation as a salvage for their new condition. Is a late implantation beneficial to these children? Objective The objective of this study is to describe the outcomes of US patients who received cochlear implants at a later age. Methods This is a retrospective study of ten patients diagnosed with US1. We collected pure-tone thresholds and speech perception tests from pre and one-year post implant. Results Average age at implantation was 18.9 years (5–49). Aided average thresholds were 103 dB HL and 35 dB HL pre and one-year post implant, respectively. Speech perception was only possible to be measured in four patients preoperatively, who scored 13.3; 26.67; 46% vowels and 56% 4-choice. All patients except one had some kind of communication. Two were bilingual. After one year of using the device, seven patients were able to perform the speech tests (from four-choice to close set sentences) and three patients abandoned the use of the implant. Conclusion We observed that detection of sounds can be achieved with late implantation, but speech recognition is only possible in patients with previous hearing stimulation, since it depends on the development of hearing skills and the maturation of the auditory pathways.


2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (S2) ◽  
pp. S38-S41 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Noda ◽  
Y Kakazu ◽  
S Komune

AbstractBackground:Good outcomes have been reported regarding the use of cochlear implants for mumps deafness. The mumps virus induces meningitis and/or encephalitis, which can cause central nervous system damage resulting in retrolabyrinthine hearing loss, for which a cochlear implant would be less effective.Cases:We installed a cochlear implant in two patients with bilateral mumps deafness; one achieved a good result with the cochlear implant, but the other did not. We discuss two possible reasons for the different outcomes. Case 1 was a three-year-old girl with bilateral parotid swelling, vomiting and walking disorder. One year after cochlear implant insertion, speech perception did not develop despite of good pure tone thresholds. Case 2 was an eight-year-old girl with bilateral parotid swelling. A cochlear implant enabled her to improve hearing perception.Conclusion:Although cochlear implants have been reported to be helpful for mumps deafness, cases that involve central nervous system damage may not achieve good results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emalka A. Gajadeera ◽  
Karyn L. Galvin ◽  
Richard C. Dowell ◽  
Peter A. Busby

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Arora ◽  
Pam Dawson ◽  
Richard Dowell ◽  
Andrew Vandali

1984 ◽  
Vol 98 (S9) ◽  
pp. 139-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. House

Our early experience with the use of cochlear implants indicated that chronic electrical stimulation to the inner ear tends to help tinnitus. For this reason we have been investigating the use of electrical stimulation as a treatment for the symptom of tinnitus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document