The impact of delaying enteral feeding on gastric emptying, plasma cholecystokinin, and peptide YY concentrations in critically ill patients*

AbstractIntroductionGastrointestinal dysfunction (GDF) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive care interventions, such as intravenous fluids and enteral feeding, can exacerbate GDF. There exists a paucity of high-quality literature on the interaction between these two modalities (intravenous fluids and enteral feeding) as a combined therapy on its impact on GDF.AimTo review the impact of intravenous fluids and enteral nutrition individually on determinants of gut function and implications in clinical practice.MethodsRandomized controlled trials on intravenous fluids and enteral feeding on GDF were identified by a comprehensive database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Extraction of data was conducted for study characteristics, provision of fluids or feeding in both groups and quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the impact of these interventions across the spectrum of GDF severity.ResultsRestricted/ goal-directed intravenous fluid therapy is likely to reduce ‘mild’ GDF such as vomiting (p = 0.03) compared to a standard/ liberal intravenous fluid regime. Enterally fed patients experienced increased episodes of vomiting (p = <0.01) but were less likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) and peritonitis (p = 0.03) compared to parenterally fed patients. Vomiting (p = <0.01) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.04) were significantly lower in the early enteral feeding group.ConclusionsThere is less emphasis on the combined approach of intravenous fluid resuscitation and enteral feeding in critically ill patients. Conservative fluid resuscitation and aggressive enteral feeding are presumably key factors contributing to severe life-threatening GDF. Future trials should evaluate the impact of cross-interaction between conservative and aggressive modes of these two interventions on the severity of GDF.

Download Full-text

Gastric emptying in critically ill patients is accelerated by adding cisapride to a standard enteral feeding protocol

Critical Care Medicine ◽

10.1097/00003246-199503000-00011 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 23 (3) ◽

pp. 481-485 ◽

Cited By ~ 80

Author(s):

Herbert D. Spapen ◽

Luc Duinslaeger ◽

Marc Diltoer ◽

Ronan Gillet ◽

Axel Bossuyt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Emptying ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Enteral Feeding ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Feeding Protocol

Download Full-text

Outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift ◽

10.1007/s00508-021-01857-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Răzvan Bologheanu ◽

Mathias Maleczek ◽

Daniel Laxar ◽

Oliver Kimberger

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Medical Specialty ◽

Routine Care ◽

Treatment Pathways ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

Matched Study ◽

The Impact

Summary Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupts routine care and alters treatment pathways in every medical specialty, including intensive care medicine, which has been at the core of the pandemic response. The impact of the pandemic is inevitably not limited to patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and their outcomes; however, the impact of COVID-19 on intensive care has not yet been analyzed. Methods The objective of this propensity score-matched study was to compare the clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients with the outcomes of prepandemic patients. Critically ill, non-COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the pandemic were matched with patients admitted in the previous year. Mortality, length of stay, and rate of readmission were compared between the two groups after matching. Results A total of 211 critically ill SARS-CoV‑2 negative patients admitted between 13 March 2020 and 16 May 2020 were matched to 211 controls, selected from a matching pool of 1421 eligible patients admitted to the ICU in 2019. After matching, the outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups: ICU mortality was 5.2% in 2019 and 8.5% in 2020, p = 0.248, while intrahospital mortality was 10.9% in 2019 and 14.2% in 2020, p = 0.378. The median ICU length of stay was similar in 2019: 4 days (IQR 2–6) compared to 2020: 4 days (IQR 2–7), p = 0.196. The rate of ICU readmission was 15.6% in 2019 and 10.9% in 2020, p = 0.344. Conclusion In this retrospective single center study, mortality, ICU length of stay, and rate of ICU readmission did not differ significantly between patients admitted to the ICU during the implementation of hospital-wide COVID-19 contingency planning and patients admitted to the ICU before the pandemic.

Download Full-text

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Based on Measured Versus Predicted Unbound Ceftriaxone Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia: An Observational Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics10050557 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (5) ◽

pp. 557

Author(s):

Matthias Gijsen ◽

Erwin Dreesen ◽

Ruth Van Daele ◽

Pieter Annaert ◽

Yves Debaveye ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Protein Binding ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Observational Cohort Study ◽

Target Attainment ◽

Binding Model ◽

Observational Cohort ◽

The Impact

The impact of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic alterations on protein binding and PK/PD target attainment still remains unclear. We evaluated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of unbound ceftriaxone in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Besides, we evaluated the accuracy of predicted vs. measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations, and its impact on PK/PD target attainment. A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe CAP. Ceftriaxone 2 g q24h intermittent infusion was administered to all patients. Successful PK/PD target attainment was defined as unbound trough concentrations above 1 or 4 mg/L throughout the whole dosing interval. Acceptable overall PK/PD target attainment was defined as successful target attainment in ≥90% of all dosing intervals. Measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations (CEFu) were compared to unbound concentrations predicted from various protein binding models. Thirty-one patients were included. The 1 mg/L and 4 mg/L targets were reached in 26/32 (81%) and 15/32 (47%) trough samples, respectively. Increased renal function was associated with the failure to attain both PK/PD targets. Unbound ceftriaxone concentrations predicted by the protein binding model developed in the present study showed acceptable bias and precision and had no major impact on PK/PD target attainment. We showed suboptimal (i.e., <90%) unbound ceftriaxone PK/PD target attainment when using a standard 2 g q24h dosing regimen in critically ill patients with severe CAP. Renal function was the major driver for the failure to attain the predefined targets, in accordance with results found in general and septic ICU patients. Interestingly, CEFu was reliably predicted from CEFt without major impact on clinical decisions regarding PK/PD target attainment. This suggests that, when carefully selecting a protein binding model, CEFu does not need to be measured. As a result, the turn-around time and cost for ceftriaxone quantification can be substantially reduced.

Download Full-text

The impact of previous hospitalization in the preceding 90 days on the outcome in critically ill patients with gram-negative bloodstream infection

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease ◽

10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.06.015 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 80 (2) ◽

pp. 136-140 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Qiaojun Zeng ◽

Fengqin Xu ◽

Shanping Jiang

Keyword(s):

Bloodstream Infection ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Previous Hospitalization ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Association between illness severity and timing of initial enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study

Nutrition Journal ◽

10.1186/1475-2891-11-30 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Hsiu-Hua Huang ◽

Chien-Wei Hsu ◽

Shiu-Ping Kang ◽

Ming-Yi Liu ◽

Sue-Joan Chang

Keyword(s):

Observational Study ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Enteral Feeding ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Illness Severity ◽

Retrospective Observational Study

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review of Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Critical Care.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1055/a-1477-3760 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Alexandra Jayne Nelson ◽

Brian W Johnston ◽

Alicia Achiaa Charlotte Waite ◽

Gedeon Lemma ◽

Ingeborg Dorothea Welters

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Critical Care ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Thromboembolic Events ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Major Bleeding Events ◽

The Impact ◽

Anticoagulated Patients

Background. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in critically ill patients. There is a paucity of data assessing the impact of anticoagulation strategies on clinical outcomes for general critical care patients with AF. Our aim was to assess the existing literature to evaluate the effectiveness of anticoagulation strategies used in critical care for AF. Methodology. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases. Studies reporting anticoagulation strategies for AF in adults admitted to a general critical care setting were assessed for inclusion. Results. Four studies were selected for data extraction. A total of 44087 patients were identified with AF, of which 17.8-49.4% received anticoagulation. The reported incidence of thromboembolic events was 0-1.4% for anticoagulated patients, and 0-1.3% in non-anticoagulated patients. Major bleeding events were reported in three studies and occurred in 7.2-8.6% of the anticoagulated patients and up to 7.1% of the non-anticoagulated patients. Conclusions. There was an increased incidence of major bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with AF in critical care compared to non-anticoagulated patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of reported thromboembolic events within studies, between patients who did and did not receive anticoagulation. However, the outcomes reported within studies were not standardised, therefore, the generalisability of our results to the general critical care population remains unclear. Further data is required to facilitate an evidence-based assessment of the risks and benefits of anticoagulation for critically ill patients with AF.

Download Full-text