A multidisciplinary approach to toxicity management of modern immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Kottschade ◽  
Adam Brys ◽  
Tobias Peikert ◽  
Mabel Ryder ◽  
Laura Raffals ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swarna Nalluru ◽  
Paramrajan Piranavan ◽  
Anvesh Narimiti ◽  
Ahmad D. Siddiqui ◽  
George M. Abraham

Abstract BACKGROUNDAlong with antitumor effects, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICPI) have shown great potential in treating chronic infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B and malaria, in ex-vivo studies. However, several case reports and case series have suggested an increased infection risk in cancer patients. The purpose of our study was to assess the risk of infections in cancer patients receiving ICPI. We also attempted to evaluate the role of a multidisciplinary approach (Oncology and Infectious disease specialists) and the cost associated with treatment. METHODS:Records on all cancer patients over age ≥18 years old who had received at least one dose of ICPI between 2015 to 2018 at a major community teaching hospital in the central Massachusetts region were reviewed. Several risk factors associated with infection were identified. A two-tailed, unpaired t-test was used to analyze the association between risk factors and infection. We calculated the cumulative length of stay (LOS) and cost per admission with a multidisciplinary vs. non-multidisciplinary approach. The calculated total average cost per admission was compared to a matched population (without an oncologic diagnosis) admitted with infections similar to that in our study, to compare the economic burden. RESULTSRetrospective chart review of 169 cancer patients receiving ICPI showed sixty-two episodes of infection in thirty-seven (21.8%) patients and a mortality rate of 3.5% due to associated complications. Risk factors like COPD, prior chemotherapy and steroid use were significantly associated (P<0.05) with infections. Further sub-group analysis showed increase in cumulative LOS from 5.9 to 8.1 days but approximately similar average cost per admission ($52,047 vs. $54,510) with non-multidisciplinary vs. multidisciplinary approach. The calculated total cost per admission during an episode of infection in this cohort of patients was $35,484; three-fold higher when matched to similar infections in a general non-oncologic population ($11,527). CONCLUSIONSA significant incidence of infections and associated health care resource utilization continues to prevail in cancer patients despite the utility of ICPI. A multidisciplinary approach to manage the infections and associated complications in cancer patients receiving ICPI increased the cumulative LOS but not the average cost per admission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 4201-4205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Maio ◽  
Omid Hamid ◽  
James Larkin ◽  
Alessia Covre ◽  
Maresa Altomonte ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyi Yan ◽  
Anagha Bangalore Kumar ◽  
Heidi Finnes ◽  
Svetomir N. Markovic ◽  
Sean Park ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 130 (13) ◽  
pp. 3484-3488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Wang ◽  
Zhigang Wang ◽  
Zoufeng Xu ◽  
Xianfeng Chen ◽  
Guangyu Zhu

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 102057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie Claps ◽  
Alessia Mennitto ◽  
Valentina Guadalupi ◽  
Pierangela Sepe ◽  
Marco Stellato ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19365-e19365
Author(s):  
swarna sri nalluru ◽  
Paramarajan Piranavan ◽  
Anvesh Narimiti ◽  
Shanil Shah ◽  
Ahmad Daniyal Siddiqui ◽  
...  

e19365 Background: Along with antitumor effects, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICPI) have shown great potential in treating chronic infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and malaria, in ex-vivo studies. However, several case reports and case series suggested increased infection risk in cancer patients receiving ICPI. The purpose of our study is to assess the risk of infections in cancer patients receiving ICPI. We also attempted to evaluate the role of a multidisciplinary approach (Oncology and Infectious disease specialists) and the cost associated with treatment. Methods: Records on all cancer patients over age ≥18 years old who had received at least one dose of ICPI from 2015 to 2018 at two major community teaching hospitals in the Central Massachusetts region were reviewed. Several risk factors associated with infection were identified. Two-tailed unpaired t-test was used to analyze the association between risk factors and infection. We calculated the average length of stay (LOS) and cost per admission with a multidisciplinary vs. non-multidisciplinary approach. The calculated total average cost per admission was compared with a random set of non-oncologic population admitted with similar infections noted in our study to estimate the economic burden. Results: Thirty-seven (21.8%) patients developed sixty-two episodes of infection. Microbiological confirmation was available in 13 episodes. Risk factors like COPD (P = 0.01), prior chemotherapy (P = 0.03), and steroid use (P = 0.003) were significantly associated with infections. An infection-associated mortality rate was noted to be 2.3%. With the involvement of multidisciplinary team, the average LOS increased from 5.9 to 8.1 days. Yet, the average cost per admission approximately remained the same (52,047$ vs. 54,510$). Upon comparison with a non-oncologic patient, the average cost per admission for an infection in cancer patients receiving ICPI increased from 11,527$ to 35,484$. Conclusions: Surprisingly, a significant incidence of infections and associated health care resource utilization continue to prevail in cancer patients despite the utility of ICPI. Although the economic burden due to the infections in this set of patients is remarkably high when compared to the general population, the multidisciplinary approach did not increase the hospital costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document