Foundation of Evidence-Based Decision Making for Health Care Managers—Part II

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Forrestal
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Practice in Primary Health Care From The Managerial Point of View: – A National Survey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Abelsson ◽  
Helena Morténius ◽  
Ann-Kristin Karlsson ◽  
Stefan Bergman ◽  
Amir Baigi
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract Background: The vast availability of and demand for evidence in modern primary health care forces clinical decisions to be made based on condensed evidence in the form of policies and guidelines. Primary health care managers play a key role in implementing these governing documents. Thus, the aim of this article was to investigate the use and availability of evidence-based practice resources from the perspective of first-line primary health care managers.Methods: The study utilized a quantitative method based on a national survey of primary health care managers. The study population was recruited nationally from Sweden and consisted of 186 respondents. The data were analysed using empirically constructed themes and validated using factor analysis. To determine the statistical significance in making comparisons, the chi-square test was utilized. Associations between variables were calculated using Spearman’s correlation. All tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set to 0.05.Results: A majority (97%) of managers stated there was an impact of guidelines and policy documents on primary health care; 84% of managers could see a direct influence in daily practices. Most of the managers (70%) stated that some adaptation had to be made when new evidence was introduced. The managers emphasised the importance of keeping themselves updated and open to new information about work routines (96%). Conclusions: Evidence-based practice has a fundamental impact on Swedish primary health care. The study illustrated a nearly unanimous response about evidence influencing daily practice. The emphasis on the importance of all staff members keeping their professional knowledge up to date can be seen as a direct result of this. An information-dense organization such as a primary health care organization would have much to gain from cooperation with regional information resources such as clinical libraries.Trial registration: Not applicable.

Are Home Care Programs Cost-Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Home Health Care ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

The cost-effectiveness of home care programs and services is an important area of health care research given the recent growth and continuing trend in home health care, the current state of health care reform in Canada, and changing demographics in Canada. Home care programs often proceed with little evidence-based decision-making. Increased demand for evidence-based decision-making is apparent in not only clinical settings, but also in policy environments thus creating a need for more research in this area. There are presently very few rigorous studies on the cost-effectiveness of home care programs. This systematic literature review addresses the research question, “What is the relationship between cost-consequence evidence and policy implications within the home care context?” The findings are not surprising. They include mixed results and indicate that cost-effectiveness of home care programs is an important area to study in spite of the many challenges. The challenges presented must be acknowledged and addressed in order to produce better research designs in future studies.

scholarly journals Commitment Levels of Health Care Providers in Using the District Health Information System and the Associated Factors for Decision Making in Resource-Limited Settings: Cross-sectional Survey Study

10.2196/23951 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e23951
Author(s):  
Shuma G Kanfe ◽  
Berhanu F Endehabtu ◽  
Mohammedjud H Ahmed ◽  
Nebyu D Mengestie ◽  
Binyam Tilahun
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Health Information System ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
District Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

Background Changing the culture of information use, which is one of the transformation agendas of the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, cannot become real unless health care providers are committed to using locally collected data for evidence-based decision making. The commitment of health care providers has paramount influence on district health information system 2 (DHIS2) data utilization for decision making. Evidence is limited on health care providers’ level of commitment to using DHIS2 data in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aims to fill this evidence gap. Objective This study aimed to assess the levels of commitment of health care providers and the factors influencing their commitment levels in using DHIS2 data for decision making at public health care facilities in the Ilu Aba Bora zone of the Oromia national regional state, Ethiopia in 2020. Methods The cross-sectional quantitative study supplemented by qualitative methods was conducted from February 26, 2020 to April 17, 2020. A total of 264 participants were approached. SPSS version 20 software was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive and analytical statistics, including bivariable and multivariable analyses, were performed. Thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data. Results Of the 264 respondents, 121 (45.8%, 95% CI 40.0%-52.8%) respondents showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data. The variables associated with the level of commitment to use DHIS2 data were found to be provision of feedback for DHIS2 data use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.02-3.33), regular supervision and managerial support (AOR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-5.37), information use culture (AOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.03-3.59), motivation to use DHIS2 data (AOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.00-3.25), health needs (AOR 3.96, 95% CI 2.11-7.41), and competency in DHIS2 tasks (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.27-4.55). Conclusions In general, less than half of the study participants showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data for decision making in health care. Providing regular supportive supervision and feedback and increasing the motivation and competency of the health care providers in performing DHIS2 data tasks will help in promoting their levels of commitment that can result in the cultural transformation of data use for evidence-based decision making in health care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document