Use of generalized transfer function-derived central blood pressure for the calculation of baroreflex gain

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Studinger ◽  
Imre Ungi ◽  
Zsuzsanna Lénárd ◽  
Beatrix Mersich ◽  
László Rudas ◽  
...  
Hypertension ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1203-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Sharman ◽  
Richard Lim ◽  
Ahmad M. Qasem ◽  
Jeff S. Coombes ◽  
Malcolm I. Burgess ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingwu Gao ◽  
William C. Rose ◽  
Barry Fetics ◽  
David A. Kass ◽  
Chen-Huan Chen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ye Li ◽  
Antoine Guilcher ◽  
Peter H. Charlton ◽  
Samuel Vennin ◽  
Jordi Alastruey ◽  
...  

Objective:Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP, the peak of the central waveform) is usually regarded as the determinant of peripheral systolic blood pressure with amplification of peripheral systolic BP (pSBP) measured with reference to cSBP. However, the earlier portion of the central waveform, up to the first systolic shoulder (P1) may be the major determinant of pSBP. Methods:We performed in silicosimulation studies and examined previously acquired experimental data (n=131) in which peripheral and central blood pressure waveforms had been acquired both invasively and non-invasively to examine the determinants of pSBP. Measurements were made at baseline and during perturbation of haemodynamics by inotropic and vasoactive drugs. Results:In silicosimulations using a central-to-peripheral transfer function demonstrated that pSBP is dependent on P1 and the rate of change (dP/dt) of central pressure up to the time of P1 but not cSBP. In computational simulations, peripheral reflection in the radial artery was closely related to dP/dt and 97% of the variability in amplification as measured with reference to P1 was explained by dP/dt.In vivo, amplification of pSBP over P1 was correlated with dP/dt (R>0.75, P<0.0001 for all data sets) and P1 and dP/dt were independently correlated with pSBP explaining 90% of the variability in pSBP. Conclusion:We conclude that P1 and dP/dt are major determinants of pSBP and that pSBP and cSBP are, in part, determined by different cardiac, central and peripheral vascular properties.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wohlfahrt ◽  
Alena Krajčoviechová ◽  
Jitka Seidlerová ◽  
Otto Mayer ◽  
Jan Filipovský ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1583-1589
Author(s):  
Pandeng Zhang ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Haibo Chen ◽  
Jia Liu

Objective: To reconstruct brachial artery pressure (BAP) distally from digital artery pressure (DAP). Methods: We hypothesize that continuous BAP can simply be approximated by sum of two halves of the continuous DAP shifted by the delay time. In order to test it, we enrolled 30 healthy volunteers for two experiments. We firstly showed that the pressure wave in the digital artery can be considered twice as much as the forward/backward wave in the finger. A simplified individualized transfer function was then derived so as to estimate BAP from DAP with the parameter of delay time estimated by tenfold cross validation. Finally, by comparing with a reference BAP, we found that the proposed method can correct the DAP. Result: The errors of the proposed method in estimating systolic and diastolic pressures are 0.4 ± 6.2 and 0.7 ± 3.7 mmHg, respectively. These results agree with the standard of Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Discussion: In our method, large arteries are modeled with a uniform, frictionless tube, while small arteries are represented as a terminal load. The unknown parameter of the delay time are estimated by tenfold cross validation. Conclusion: Our method is therefore promising in estimating continuous proximal blood pressure from peripheral blood pressure in practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document