scholarly journals Direct costs associated with adverse events of systemic therapies for advanced melanoma

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (31) ◽  
pp. e11736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Copley-Merriman ◽  
Kendall Stevinson ◽  
Frank Xiaoqing Liu ◽  
Jingshu Wang ◽  
Josephine Mauskopf ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. A466
Author(s):  
F Lopes ◽  
MJ Passos ◽  
A Raimundo ◽  
PA Laires

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 867-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Z Fu ◽  
Zhiyi Li ◽  
Jackson Tang ◽  
Syed Mahmood ◽  
Tyler Whisman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1589-TPS1589
Author(s):  
Milan Kos ◽  
Laurien Buffart ◽  
Jan Willem de Groot ◽  
Hans Westgeest ◽  
Wouter Dercksen ◽  
...  

TPS1589 Background: The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. However, these treatment modalities are also associated with specific immune-related toxicities. These are often reversible after prompt recognition and initiation of appropriate management, but can result in severe morbidity and hamper health-related quality of life (HRQoL) if left undetected. Hence, accurate and regular monitoring of these patients is critical. Recent advances in mHealth technologies and the rapidly expanding armamentarium of wearable devices allow for real-time objective (vital signs and physical activity) data and patient-reported outcome measurement (PROMs) collection and, hence, serve this purpose. We hypothesize that collection of real-time objective data adds to the early detection of disease- and treatment-related adverse events. The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of collecting real-time PROMs, vital signs, and physical activity data in advanced melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy using a comprehensive ambulatory monitoring platform (CAMP) that consists of a smartphone app, activity monitor, digital thermometer, and online dashboard for physicians. Methods: In this prospective multi-center trial, patients (n = 50) with advanced melanoma, scheduled to receive immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, and with access to a smartphone are eligible for inclusion. Consenting patients will be asked to wear a FitBit Versa 2.0 during waking hours, collect daily temperature measurements using a Withings Smart Temporal thermometer, and answer weekly toxicity questionnaires (NCI PRO-CTCAE) using the smartphone app for the duration of the study (12 weeks). Primary outcome is feasibility in terms of (i) participation rates, (ii) wear-time, (iii) compliance rates with in-app questionnaires and temperature measurements, and (iv) satisfaction with the platform. Secondary exploratory outcomes include associations between CAMP-derived parameters and clinical outcomes: performance status (PS), HR-QoL scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire), unplanned hospitalizations, physician-assessed adverse events, and 1-year survival outcomes. PS and HR-QoL will be rated at baseline, mid-study, and end-of-study. The occurrence of adverse events will be documented up to 12 months from baseline. Survival outcomes will be compared to a propensity score matched group from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Accrual has started in February 2021. Clinical trial information: NL8827.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e201611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Yuan Chang ◽  
Haesuk Park ◽  
Daniel C. Malone ◽  
Ching-Yu Wang ◽  
Debbie L. Wilson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. P186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Grimaldi ◽  
Ester Simeone ◽  
Lucia Festino ◽  
Diana Giannarelli ◽  
Marco Palla ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-446
Author(s):  
Aleksi Suo ◽  
Yin Chan ◽  
Carissa Beaulieu ◽  
Shiying Kong ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Kiran Virik ◽  
Robert B. Wilson

376 Background: Systemic treatment options in pre-treated patients with advanced/metastatic GC and GEJC have historically been limited especially in the third line or more. Recent potential advances in the therapeutic landscape of this patient population include TT (TAGS study) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as N (ATTRACTION-2 study). There is an anticipated budgetary impact on healthcare systems within the context of these potentially funded options. An economic evaluation can be instrumental in choosing a regimen if survival and quality of life are felt to be comparable. Methods: A cost minimization analysis was performed in Canadian dollars ($) comparing TT and N respectively in advanced de novo and relapsed GC/GEJC cases diagnosed in 2017 and subsequently treated in the third line in Canada. Direct costs including drug acquisition costs, supportive medications, transfusions, laboratory tests, physician visits, pharmacy and nursing time (health resource utilization-HRU) costs were calculated utilizing Ontario data. Direct costs for treatable adverse events G3/4 > 5% were incorporated. The analysis assumed complete drug delivery and the number of target patients was derived from constructed schema. Results: Compared to TT, the use of N was associated with a higher direct cost by a difference of $2.63 million (M) in the third line for GC and GEJC in Canada, principally reflecting a greater drug acquisition cost.The direct costs ranged (IQR) from 3.65M - 10.62M for TT to 3.3M – 15.69 M for N. N also had a greater HRU cost at 2.7 times that of TT and this was 64% of the direct costs for N excluding drug cost versus 42% of the direct non drug costs for TT. Supportive care (GCSF and transfusions) were 34% of the direct cost for TT excluding drug cost. A sensitivity analysis was performed. Conclusions: N generated a higher direct cost both for drug acquisition cost and other direct costs especially in HRU. Despite the increased cost of supportive care for adverse events related to TT, the direct non drug costs were less for this option. The use of biomarkers predictive of response may reduce the potential cost burden of the use of ICIs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document