scholarly journals Predictors of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among individuals in a HIV vaccine preparedness cohort in Masaka, Uganda

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (44) ◽  
pp. e27719
Author(s):  
Sylvia Kusemererwa ◽  
Sheila Kansiime ◽  
Gertrude Mutonyi ◽  
Aeron Namirembe ◽  
Safina Katana ◽  
...  
Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1001
Author(s):  
Parveen Sobia ◽  
Derseree Archary

Almost four decades on, since the 1980’s, with hundreds of HIV vaccine candidates tested in both non-human primates and humans, and several HIV vaccines trials later, an efficacious HIV vaccine continues to evade us. The enormous worldwide genetic diversity of HIV, combined with HIV’s inherent recombination and high mutation rates, has hampered the development of an effective vaccine. Despite the advent of antiretrovirals as pre-exposure prophylaxis and preventative treatment, which have shown to be effective, HIV infections continue to proliferate, highlighting the great need for a vaccine. Here, we provide a brief history for the HIV vaccine field, with the most recent disappointments and advancements. We also provide an update on current passive immunity trials, testing proof of the concept of the most clinically advanced broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for HIV prevention. Finally, we include mucosal immunity, the importance of vaccine-elicited immune responses and the challenges thereof in the most vulnerable environment–the female genital tract and the rectal surfaces of the gastrointestinal tract for heterosexual and men who have sex with men transmissions, respectively.


Author(s):  
Blythe J.S. Adamson ◽  
Josh J. Carlson ◽  
James G. Kublin ◽  
Louis P. Garrison, Jr.

This economic evaluation aims to support policy-making on the combined use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with HIV vaccines by evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of implementation that would support the design of clinical trials for assessment of combined product safety and efficacy. The target study population is a cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. Policy strategies considered include standard HIV prevention, daily oral PrEP, HIV vaccine, and their combination. We constructed a Markov model based on clinical trial data and published literature. We used a payer perspective, monthly cycle length, a lifetime horizon, and a 3% discount rate. We assumed a price of $500 per HIV vaccine series in the base case. HIV vaccines dominated standard care and PrEP. At current prices,PrEP was not cost-effective alone or in combination. A combination strategy had the greatest health benefit but was not cost-effective (ICER=$463,448/QALY) as compared to vaccination alone. Sensitivity analyses suggest a combination may be valuable for higher-risk men with good adherence. Vaccine durability and PrEP drug prices were key drivers of cost-effectiveness. Results suggest that boosting potential may be key to HIV vaccine value.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ambrosioni ◽  
Elisa Petit ◽  
Geoffroy Liegeon ◽  
Montserrat Laguno ◽  
José M Miró
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
Asher Mullard
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document