Safe Use of Low–Molecular-weight Heparin in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma Around Lumbar Punctures

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 596-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremie H. Estepp ◽  
Matthew P. Smeltzer ◽  
Guolian Kang ◽  
Scott C. Howard ◽  
Ulrike M. Reiss
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3867-3867
Author(s):  
Rachael F. Grace ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Donna S. Neuberg ◽  
Stephen E. Sallan ◽  
Lewis B. Silverman ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults confers a high risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications with a 34% VTE rate reported in our previous study. We describe the safety and adherence to prophylactic anticoagulation during induction in adults treated on the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL consortium protocol. Methods 110 patients (pts) with ALL ages 18-50 years enrolled on a high-risk pediatric treatment regimen through the DFCI ALL Consortium from September 2010 through June 2013. All pts received a multi-agent remission induction regimen including asparaginase (ASP). After initial accrual, a high rate of ASP related toxicity events including VTE led to a protocol amendment with recommended guidelines for prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, or unfractionated heparin during induction therapy. Induction therapy was modified so that the first 66 pts received 2500 IU/m2 of PEG-ASP, and the final 44 pts received 25,000 IU/m2 of native E.coli ASP. Data were collected prospectively regarding the use, monitoring, and side effects of prophylactic anticoagulation. Eligible pts included those with Philadelphia-negative ALL who received the induction dose of ASP and were either enrolled pre-amendment (n=47) or participated in prophylactic monitoring post-amendment (n=21). Results 21 of 27 (78%) pts enrolled post-amendment received prophylactic anticoagulation during induction. Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin, n=13 and enoxaparin, n=8) was given once daily in 90% and twice daily in 10% of the pts receiving prophylaxis. 0% (0/21) of pts receiving prophylactic anticoagulation had a VTE during induction; 11% (5/47) without prophylactic anticoagulation prior to the amendment had a VTE (p=0.31). No pts on prophylactic anticoagulation had grade ≥2 bleeding. Of the pts who received prophylactic anticoagulation, the following bleeding complications occurred during induction: excess bruising (n=4), drainage from line site (n=2), grade I rectal bleeding (n=1). While on anticoagulation, platelet (plt) transfusion criteria varied; the majority were transfused to plts ≥ 30 kcells/ul. Anticoagulation was held for procedures (86%), thrombocytopenia< 30 kells/ul (33%), and bleeding (5%). Antithrombin levels were followed in 10 of the 21 subjects with a median nadir on week 2 of induction (median 68%, range 47-124%). Fibrinogen levels also had a median nadir on week 2 of 150 mg/dl (range 97-458 mg/dl). Cryoprecipitate was infused in 2 pts receiving anticoagulation. Conclusions Prophylactic anticoagulation can be administered during multi-agent remission induction to adults with ALL. In this study, there was no increase in number or severity of bleeding events on prophylactic anticoagulation. Continued follow up of these pts on prophylaxis during consolidation chemotherapy will allow for additional safety information. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Low molecular weight heparin for prophylactic anticoagulation during acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy. Silverman:EUSA: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sigma Tau: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimo C. Stine ◽  
Robert L. Saylors ◽  
C. Suzanne Saccente ◽  
David L. Becton

There are few data regarding the use of enoxaparin in children undergoing myelosuppressive therapy for malignancies even though thrombosis is a known risk in pediatric patients with malignancies. Low-molecular-weight heparin such as enoxaparin has become widely used in adult patients with thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to review the utilization of low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin (Lovenox), in children with cancer at our institution who had thrombosis while undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In particular we were interested in the efficacy of enoxaparin in these patients, and in whether these children were able to continue their chemotherapy without adjustment or interruption secondary to bleeding complications. We conducted a retrospective review from 1999 through April 1, 2004. Seven patients (4—17 years of age) were identified. Diagnosis included B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n=three), T-ALL, Hodgkin's disease, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma (n=one each). Six patients had a deep vein thrombus (DVT) or clot of the vena cava. One of these six patients also had a pulmonary embolus. One patient presented with manifestations of a unilateral cerebral vascular accident without evidence of DVT. Most patients were screened for known hypercoaguable abnormalities. Treatment was enoxaparin, 1—1.5 mg/kg/dose twice daily to maintain a heparin anti-Xa level of 0.5—1.5 IU/mL till clot resolution. The dose was then decreased to daily for a total of 3—6 months of therapy. All patients had resolution of their thrombosis within 1—2 months of initiation of enoxaparin, and none required delays or dose reduction of their chemotherapy regimens while on anticoagulation, though some were supported by blood and platelet transfusions. Enoxaparin was safely administered to this series of seven patients for thrombotic complications in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-137
Author(s):  
Ruiqi Chen ◽  
Xing Liu ◽  
Arjun D. Law ◽  
Solaf Kanfar ◽  
Dawn Maze ◽  
...  

Background: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in patients treated with asparaginase (ASNase)-including regiments. However, VTE risk in adult Philadelphia-positive ALL (Ph+ve ALL) patients treated with non-hyperCVAD chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we examined VTE incidence in adult Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a pediatric-inspired asparaginase (ASNase)-free regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol. Methods: a single centre retrospective review of Ph+ve ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008–2019 with imatinib plus modified DFCI protocol was conducted. Results: of the 123 patients included, 30 (24.3%) had at least 1 radiology confirmed VTE event from diagnosis to the end of maintenance therapy. 86.7% (26/30) of the VTE events occurred during active treatment. Of all VTE events, the majority (53.3%) were DVT and/or PE while another significant portion were catheter-related (40.0%). Major bleeding was observed in 1 patient on VTE treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Conclusion: a high VTE incidence (24.3%) was observed in adults Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus an ASNase-free modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol, suggesting prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for all adult Ph+ve ALL patients including those treated with ASNase-free regimens.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4915-4915
Author(s):  
Beverly Schaefer ◽  
Adriane Hausfeld ◽  
Paul Steele ◽  
Jan Martin ◽  
Sandra Brannon ◽  
...  

Introduction: Enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin, LMWH) is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for pediatric patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) (Goldenberg et al. 2015). The gold-standard LMWH activity (anti-Xa activity) assays differ in whether they add exogenous antithrombin (AT) or dextran sulfate (Ignjatovic et al. 2007). Adding AT would "standardize" results in patients with low antithrombin, such as infants and asparaginase-treated patients (Mitchell et al 2010); however, questions remain about which assay best reflects the patient's anticoagulation effect and the degree of discrepancy between assays. We assessed LMWH activity in residual plasma samples from a cohort of anticoagulated pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma (ALL) patients, with history of VTE and variable AT levels, on four platforms (two instruments and their kits +/- exogenous AT). Methods: We analyzed 60 de-identified residual plasma samples from 12 anticoagulated ALL patients (2-19 years. Mean 13.75 yr) who had AT levels obtained for clinical care. All consented to the IRB-approved Oncology Tissue Repository. LMWH activity was assessed on Siemens and Stago instruments using their recommended kits that did or did not contain exogenous AT (Table 1), according to manufacturer recommendations, by experienced laboratorians. Results: Results were interpretable on 236/240 with 4 rejected for lipemia. Mean AT activity was 80 (42-138 ng/ml, lab normal >81%). Correlation was acceptable for the published kit ranges of LMWH activity when comparing kits +AT (Berichrom® to Stachrom®, r=0.82, p<0.0001), -AT (Innovance® to STA®-Liquid Anti-Xa: r=0.93, p<0.0001), and within the same manufacturer (Berichrom® to Innovance®, r=0.92, p<0.0001, Stachrom® to STA®-Liquid Anti-Xa r=0.98, p<0.0001) (Table 2, Figure 1, Figure 2). Comparing +AT or not by manufacturer, there was a nonsignificant trend to higher LMWH activity result with +AT kits. When AT levels were <70 ng/ml (n=19, mean 56 ng/dl) there was a trend to underestimate LMWH activity when AT was not added; this reached significance when the Stago methods were compared (Table 2.) Conclusions: There is acceptable correlation of LMWH activity using kits with or without exogenous AT in anticoagulated pediatric plasma samples; however, in low AT samples, LMWH activity trends lower in platforms without exogenous AT. Use of residual samples precluded conclusions about the clinical impact of this difference; however, there were a few instances where subtherapeutic activity in the -AT assay was in the therapeutic range (0.5-1 activity units) in the +AT assay. Clinicians should know whether exogenous AT is used in their own laboratory's assay and understand that added AT could overestimate the LMWH effect in patients with low AT levels. Disclosures Schaefer: Stago: Research Funding; Siemens: Research Funding.


1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 166-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn R Hermes De Santis ◽  
Betsy S Laumeister ◽  
Vidhu Bansal ◽  
Vandana Kataria ◽  
Preeti Loomba ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document