Effects of Twitch Contraction Induced by Magnetic Stimulation on Expression of Skeletal Muscle Fibrosis Related Genes and Limited Range of Motion in Rats

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Kiyoko Kubo ◽  
Junya Sakamoto ◽  
Ayana Honda ◽  
Yuichiro Honda ◽  
Hideki Kataoka ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Derek Lura ◽  
Rajiv Dubey ◽  
Stephanie L. Carey ◽  
M. Jason Highsmith

The prostheses used by the majority of persons with hand/arm amputations today have a very limited range of motion. Transradial (below the elbow) amputees lose the three degrees of freedom provided by the wrist and forearm. Some myoeletric prostheses currently allow for forearm pronation and supination (rotation about an axis parallel to the forearm) and the operation of a powered prosthetic hand. Older body-powered prostheses, incorporating hooks and other cable driven terminal devices, have even fewer degrees of freedom. In order to perform activities of daily living (ADL), a person with amputation(s) must use a greater than normal range of movement from other body joints to compensate for the loss of movement caused by the amputation. By studying the compensatory motion of prosthetic users we can understand the mechanics of how they adapt to the loss of range of motion in a given limb for select tasks. The purpose of this study is to create a biomechanical model that can predict the compensatory motion using given subject data. The simulation can then be used to select the best prosthesis for a given user, or to design prostheses that are more effective at selected tasks, once enough data has been analyzed. Joint locations necessary to accomplish the task with a given configuration are calculated by the simulation for a set of prostheses and tasks. The simulation contains a set of prosthetic configurations that are represented by parameters that consist of the degrees of freedom provided by the selected prosthesis. The simulation also contains a set of task information that includes joint constraints, and trajectories which the hand or prosthesis follows to perform the task. The simulation allows for movement in the wrist and forearm, which is dependent on the prosthetic configuration, elbow flexion, three degrees of rotation at the shoulder joint, movement of the shoulder joint about the sternoclavicular joint, and translation and rotation of the torso. All joints have definable restrictions determined by the prosthesis, and task.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Grefte ◽  
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Ruurd Torensma ◽  
Johannes W Von den Hoff

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (23) ◽  
pp. 5802-5811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiou Pan ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Haifeng Qian ◽  
Xiguang Qi ◽  
Gangcheng Wu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 20-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela L. Rebolledo ◽  
David González ◽  
Jennifer Faundez-Contreras ◽  
Osvaldo Contreras ◽  
Carlos P. Vio ◽  
...  

Open Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-813
Author(s):  
C. Garving ◽  
T. Dienstknecht ◽  
K. Horst ◽  
M. Pishnamaz ◽  
P. Kobbe ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction. Bilateral posterior dislocation of the shoulder is a rare injury, accounted for about 2–5% of all shoulder dislocations. Main courses are electrical shock, epilepsy or extreme trauma with uncontrolled muscle forces. We report about a case of bilateral posterior shoulder dislocation without additional fractures but with a concomitant acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Case presentation. A 46-year-old Caucasian motorcyclist presented to our facility after a fall on slippery ground. He claimed pain in both shoulders with limited range of motion. The initial X-rays were inconclusive, clinical examination showed typical findings of a Rockwood injury with an additional limited external rotation so that a posterior shoulder dislocation was suspected. The CT scan confirmed the clinical suspicion. A closed reduction was performed followed by immobilization in a shoulder abduction pillow for 4 weeks and continuous physiotherapy. Upon follow up normal function with full range of motion was observed. Conclusion. A bilateral posterior shoulder dislocation can be caused by trauma and results in a limited range of motion with often additional injuries. Due to the unusually presentation the risk of missing the injury is increased. Therefore it is most important to consider this rare diagnosis and in case of clinical suspicion perform a careful algorithm of diagnostic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document