Dose Reduction and Image Quality Assessment in 64-Detector Row Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries Using an Automatic Exposure Control System

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Francone ◽  
Elisabetta Di Castro ◽  
Alessandro Napoli ◽  
Chiara Bolzan ◽  
Iacopo Carbone ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Juliane Conzelmann ◽  
Ulrich Genske ◽  
Arthur Emig ◽  
Michael Scheel ◽  
Bernd Hamm ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effects of anatomical phantom structure on task-based image quality assessment compared with a uniform phantom background. Methods Two neck phantom types of identical shape were investigated: a uniform type containing 10-mm lesions with 4, 9, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast to the surrounding area and an anatomically realistic type containing lesions of the same size and location with 10, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast. Phantom images were acquired at two dose levels (CTDIvol of 1.4 and 5.6 mGy) and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). Detection accuracy was evaluated by seven radiologists in a 4-alternative forced choice experiment. Results Anatomical phantom structure impaired lesion detection at all lesion contrasts (p < 0.01). Detectability in the anatomical phantom at 30 HU contrast was similar to 9 HU contrast in uniform images (91.1% vs. 89.5%). Detection accuracy decreased from 83.6% at 5.6 mGy to 55.4% at 1.4 mGy in uniform FBP images (p < 0.001), whereas AIDR 3D preserved detectability at 1.4 mGy (80.7% vs. 85% at 5.6 mGy, p = 0.375) and was superior to FBP (p < 0.001). In the assessment of anatomical images, superiority of AIDR 3D was not confirmed and dose reduction moderately affected detectability (74.6% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.027 for FBP and 81.1% vs. 73%, p = 0.018 for AIDR 3D). Conclusions A lesion contrast increase from 9 to 30 HU is necessary for similar detectability in anatomical and uniform neck phantom images. Anatomical phantom structure influences task-based assessment of iterative reconstruction and dose effects. Key Points • A lesion contrast increase from 9 to 30 HU is necessary for similar low-contrast detectability in anatomical and uniform neck phantom images. • Phantom background structure influences task-based assessment of iterative reconstruction and dose effects. • Transferability of CT assessment to clinical imaging can be expected to improve as the realism of the test environment increases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Vinicius Linhares de Oliveira ◽  
António Carvalho Santos ◽  
Graciano Paulo ◽  
Paulo Sergio Flores Campos ◽  
Joana Santos

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 1137-1143
Author(s):  
Keisuke Takiguchi ◽  
Atsushi Urikura ◽  
Tsukasa Yoshida ◽  
Kenichi Hirosawa ◽  
Takahiro Ito ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Sariyanto Ginanjar Kartasasmita ◽  
Mayarani Mayarani ◽  
Novan Hendra Hariyanto

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan nilai dosis radiasi dan kualitas gambar pada pemeriksaan CT Scanurologi non kontras dengan perbedaan teknik Automatic Exposure Control(AEC) dan teknik fixed mA. Desain penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif analitik. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Instalasi Radiologi RS Swasta di Jakarta Utara pada bulan Agustus – Oktober 2019. Jumlah sampel dari penelitian ini adalah 40 orang dengan empat perbedaan perlakuan dan masing-masing perlakuan berjumlah 10 pasien yang dipilih berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan berupa observasi dan dokumentasi. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan yaitu lembar kerja untuk mencatat data selama penelitian berlangsung dan komputer AdvantageWorkstation Computed Tomography ( AWCT) untuk mengukur nilai atau kualitas citra gambar CT Scan.Pengolahan dan analisis hasil data menggunakan program komputasi. Hasil dari penelitian penggunaan teknik Automatic Exposure Control(AEC) dapat memberikan dosis radiasi yang optimal dengan kualitas gambar CT Scan yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan teknik fixed mA. Meskipun teknik fixed mA100 dapat memberikan nilai dosis radiasi yang lebih kecil dibandingkan teknik AEC tetapi menghasilkan kualitas gambar yang kurang baik


2011 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiki Chono ◽  
Tohru Hirano ◽  
Takeshi Inoue ◽  
Shinichi Tokuyasu ◽  
Ko Higuchi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document