Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasonography

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-292
Author(s):  
Juan M. Gonzalez ◽  
Nichole Crenshaw ◽  
Patricia Larrieu-Jimenez ◽  
Jeffrey Groom ◽  
Shayne Hauglum ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. e20181621 ◽  
Author(s):  
María V. Fraga ◽  
Jason Z. Stoller ◽  
Scott A. Lorch

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 932-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina D. Daswani ◽  
Vaishali P. Shah ◽  
Jeffrey R. Avner ◽  
Deepa G. Manwani ◽  
Jessica Kurian ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 250 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Ward ◽  
Gregory R. Lisciandro ◽  
Bruce W. Keene ◽  
Sandra P. Tou ◽  
Teresa C. DeFrancesco

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n2132
Author(s):  
Loïc Lhopitallier ◽  
Andreas Kronenberg ◽  
Jean-Yves Meuwly ◽  
Isabella Locatelli ◽  
Yolanda Mueller ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To assess whether point-of care procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. Design Three group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from September 2018 to March 2020. Setting 60 Swiss general practices. Participants One general practitioner per practice was included. General practitioners screen all patients with acute cough; patients with clinical pneumonia were included. Interventions Randomisation in a 1:1:1 of general practitioners to either antibiotics guided by sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests (UltraPro; n=152), procalcitonin guided antibiotics (n=195), or usual care (n=122). Main outcomes Primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group prescribed an antibiotic by day 28. Secondary outcomes included duration of restricted activities due to lower respiratory tract infection within 14 days. Results 60 general practitioners included 469 patients (median age 53 years (interquartile range 38-66); 278 (59%) were female). Probability of antibiotic prescription at day 28 was lower in the procalcitonin group than in the usual care group (0.40 v 0.70, cluster corrected difference −0.26 (95% confidence interval −0.41 to −0.10)). No significant difference was seen between UltraPro and procalcitonin groups (0.41 v 0.40, −0.03 (−0.17 to 0.12)). The median number of days with restricted activities by day 14 was 4 days in the procalcitonin group and 3 days in the usual care group (difference 1 day (95% confidence interval −0.23 to 2.32); hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97)), which did not prove non-inferiority. Conclusions Compared with usual care, point-of-care procalcitonin led to a 26% absolute reduction in the probability of 28 day antibiotic prescription without affecting patients’ safety. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography did not further reduce antibiotic prescription, although a potential added value cannot be excluded, owing to the wide confidence intervals. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191071 .


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Harel-Sterling ◽  
Mamadou Diallo ◽  
Sabeena Santhirakumaran ◽  
Timea Maxim ◽  
Mark Tessaro

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Navid Saigal

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become firmly established in acute and critical care settings and has now emerged as an important tool in the assessment of the Extra Vascular Lung Water (EVLW). Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be performed quickly and easily in critically ill patients. It has a higher diagnostic accuracy than physical examination and chest radiography combined. It enhances safety by avoiding ionizing radiation and the need for potentially dangerous transfers within the hospital. LUS can also be used to guide fluid management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Pachtman ◽  
Seth Koenig ◽  
Natalie Meirowitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document