scholarly journals Eye and head movements are complementary in visual selection

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 160569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grayden J. F. Solman ◽  
Tom Foulsham ◽  
Alan Kingstone
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Selection ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Vertical Slot ◽  
New Information ◽  
Complementary Pattern ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Nested System

In the natural environment, visual selection is accomplished by a system of nested effectors, moving the head and body within space and the eyes within the visual field. However, it is not yet known if the principles of selection for these different effectors are the same or different. We used a novel gaze-contingent display in which an asymmetric window of visibility (a horizontal or vertical slot) was yoked to either head or eye position. Participants showed highly systematic changes in behaviour, revealing clear differences in the principles underlying selection by eye and head. Eye movements were more likely to move in the direction of visible information—horizontally when viewing with a horizontal slot, and vertically with a vertical slot. Head movements showed the opposite and complementary pattern, moving to reveal new information (e.g. vertically with a horizontal slot and vice versa). These results are consistent with a nested system in which the head favours exploration of unknown regions, while the eye exploits what can be seen with finer-scale saccades.

Optokinetic Memory in the Crab, Carcinus

1966 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-245
Author(s):  
G. A. HORRIDGE
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Feedback ◽  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Dark Period ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Movement Perception ◽  
Memory Experiment

1. A crab is held at the centre of an illuminated stationary striped drum or any visual field with strong contrasts. After a time all lights are turned off and the drum is moved in the dark. The light is restored when the drum is stationary in its new position. The animal responds by a movement of the eyes. 2. Stimuli of 0.5° over a dark period of 2 min. or 1° over 15 min. give a response. The response depends on the angle of the drum movement, and is slower in performance and less in total amount for longer periods of darkness. 3. On re-illumination the movement of the eye relative to the stationary drum is such that the visual field moves across the eye in the opposite direction to the eye's movement, but nevertheless the perception of small drum oscillations is not impaired. 4. When the visual feedback loop is opened by clamping the seeing eye and painting over the moving one, eye movements can be greater than drum movements, as in movement perception. Comparison of calculated with experimental closed-loop conditions shows that in the memory experiment there is no attenuation or amplification in the visual feedback loop. 5. Perception of very slow movements and stabilization of eye position could, but do not necessarily, depend on this accurate but short-lived directional memory.

Eye position effects in saccadic adaptation

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 2536-2545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Havermann ◽  
Eckart Zimmermann ◽  
Markus Lappe
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Initial Position ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Saccade Amplitude ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Position Information ◽  
Saccadic Adaptation ◽  
Visual Error

Saccades are used by the visual system to explore visual space with the high accuracy of the fovea. The visual error after the saccade is used to adapt the control of subsequent eye movements of the same amplitude and direction in order to keep saccades accurate. Saccadic adaptation is thus specific to saccade amplitude and direction. In the present study we show that saccadic adaptation is also specific to the initial position of the eye in the orbit. This is useful, because saccades are normally accompanied by head movements and the control of combined head and eye movements depends on eye position. Many parts of the saccadic system contain eye position information. Using the intrasaccadic target step paradigm, we adaptively reduced the amplitude of reactive saccades to a suddenly appearing target at a selective position of the eyes in the orbitae and tested the resulting amplitude changes for the same saccade vector at other starting positions. For central adaptation positions the saccade amplitude reduction transferred completely to eccentric starting positions. However, for adaptation at eccentric starting positions, there was a reduced transfer to saccades from central starting positions or from eccentric starting positions in the opposite hemifield. Thus eye position information modifies the transfer of saccadic amplitude changes in the adaptation of reactive saccades. A gain field mechanism may explain the eye position dependence found.

Properties of signals that determine the amplitude and direction of saccadic eye movements in monkeys

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. McKenzie ◽  
S. G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Polar Coordinates ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Spatial Error ◽  
Internal Feedback ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Smooth Change ◽  
Highly Correlated

Monkeys were trained to make saccades to briefly flashed targets. We presented the flash during smooth pursuit of another target, so that there was a smooth change in eye position after the flash. We could then determine whether the flash-evoked saccades compensated for the intervening smooth eye movements to point the eyes at the position of the flash in space. We defined the "retinal error" as the vector from the position of the eye at the time of the flash to the position of the target. We defined "spatial error" as the vector from the position of the eye at the time of the saccade to the position of the flashed target in space. The direction of the saccade (in polar coordinates) was more highly correlated with the direction of the retinal error than with the direction of the spatial error. Saccade amplitude was also better correlated with the amplitude of the retinal error. We obtained the same results whether the flash was presented during pursuit with the head fixed or during pursuit with combined eye-head movements. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the direction of the saccade was determined only by the retinal error in two of the three monkeys. In the third monkey saccade direction was determined primarily by retinal error but had a consistent bias toward spatial error. The bias can be attributed to this monkey's earlier practice in which the flashed target was reilluminated so he could ultimately make a saccade to the correct position in space. These data suggest that the saccade generator does not normally use nonvisual feedback about smooth changes in eye or gaze position. In two monkeys we also provided sequential target flashes during pursuit with the second flash timed so that it occurred just before the first saccade. As above, the first saccade was appropriate for the retinal error provided by the first flash. The second saccade compensated for the first and pointed the eyes at the position of the second target in space. We conclude, as others have before (12, 21), that the saccade generator receives feedback about its own output, saccades. Our results require revision of existing models of the neural network that generates saccades. We suggest two models that retain the use of internal feedback suggested by others. We favor a model that accounts for our data by assuming that internal feedback originates directly from the output of the saccade generator and reports only saccadic changes in eye position.

scholarly journals Mice Make Targeted Saccades

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian H. Zahler ◽  
David E. Taylor ◽  
Julia M. Adams ◽  
Evan H. Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Innate Behavior ◽  
High Acuity ◽  
Early Origin ◽  
Innate Ability

AbstractHumans read text, recognize faces, and process emotions using targeted saccadic eye movements. In the textbook model, this innate ability to make targeted saccades evolved in species with foveae or similar high-acuity retinal specializations that enable scrutiny of salient stimuli. According to the model, saccades made by species without retinal specializations (such as mice) are never targeted and serve only to reset the eyes after gaze-stabilizing movements. Here we show that mice innately make touch-evoked targeted saccades. Optogenetic manipulations revealed the neural circuit mechanisms underlying targeted saccades are conserved. Saccade probability is a U-shaped function of current eye position relative to the target, mirroring the simulated relationship between an object’s location within the visual field and the probability its next movement carries it out of view. Thus, a cardinal sophistication of our visual system may have had an unexpectedly early origin as an innate behavior that keeps stimuli in view.

Importance of the vestibular system in visually induced nausea and self-vection

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter H. Johnson ◽  
Fred A. Sunahara ◽  
Jack P. Landolt
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Vestibular System ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Sensory Input ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Visual Input ◽  
Head Movements

The objective of this study was to determine the importance, if any, of the non-auditory labyrinth of the inner ear in visually induced nausea and self-vection in subjects exposed to a moving visual field with and without concomitant pitching head movements. Subjects teated were 15 normals, 18 unilateral labyrinthectomies and 6 bilateral labyrinthectomies. The findings show a higher incidence of pseudo-Coriolis induced nausea in normal subjects compared to unilateral and bilateral labyrinthectomized subjects. When the subjects were exposed to the moving visual field only (no head movement), pronounced self-vection occurred in all subjects, but with earlier onset in the bilateral labyrinthine defective subjects as compared to normal and unilateral defective subjects. The subjective intensities of self-vections reported by labyrinth-defectives were much more pronounced as compared to normal subjects, and it is apparent that visual input in these subjects achieves much more importance in maintaining compensatory eye movements, and the gain of neck reflexes is enhanced. The findings that visual stimulation is more effective in producing the disabling effects after labyrinthine destruction could possibly be explained by enhancement of vision after loss of labyrinthine sensory input, and the gain in neck reflexes is also enhanced after labyrinthectomy.

Early Coding of Reaching in the Parietooccipital Cortex

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 2374-2391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer ◽  
Stefano Ferraina ◽  
Takashi Mitsuda ◽  
Barbara Marconi ◽  
Aldo Genovesio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Neural Activity ◽  
Movement Time ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Eye Position

Neural activity was recorded in the parietooccipital cortex while monkeys performed different tasks aimed at investigating visuomotor interactions of retinal, eye, and arm-related signals on neural activity. The tasks were arm reaching 1) to foveated targets; 2) to extrafoveal targets, with constant eye position; 3) within an instructed-delayed paradigm, under both light and darkness; 4) saccadic eye movements toward, and static eye holding on peripheral targets; and 5) visual fixation and stimulation. The activity of many cells was modulated during arm reaction (68%) and movement time (58%), and during static holding of the arm in space (64%), when eye position was kept constant. Eye position influenced the activity of many cells during hand reaction (45%) and movement time (51%) and holding of hand static position (69%). Many cells (56%) were also modulated during preparation for hand movement, in the delayed reach task. Modulation was present also in the dark in 59% of cells during this epoch, 51% during reaction and movement time, and 48% during eye/hand holding on the target. Cells (50%) displaying light-dark differences of activity were considered as related to the sight and monitoring of hand motion and/or position in the visual field. Saccadic eye movements modulated a smaller percentage (25%) of cells than eye position (68%). Visual receptive fields were mapped in 44% of the cells studied. They were generally large and extended to the periphery of the tested (30°) visual field. Sixty-six percent of cells were motion sensitive. Therefore the activity of many neurons in this area reflects the combined influence of visual, eye, and arm movement–related signals. For most neurons, the orientation of the preferred directions computed across different epochs and tasks, therefore expression of all different eye- and hand-related activity types, clustered within a limited sector of space, the field of global tuning. These spatial fields might be an ideal frame to combine eye and hand signals, thanks to the congruence of their tuning properties. The relationships between cell activity and oculomotor and visuomanual behavior were task dependent. During saccades, most cells were recruited when the eye moved to a spatial location that was also target for hand movement, whereas during hand movement most cells fired depending on whether or not the animal had prior knowledge about the location of the visual targets.

Neuron activity in monkey vestibular nuclei during vertical vestibular stimulation and eye movements

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 724-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Chubb ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
C. A. Scudder
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Fasciculus ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Eye Velocity

To elucidate how information is processed in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) pathways subserving vertical eye movements, extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from the vestibular nuclei of alert monkeys trained to track a visual target with their eyes while undergoing sinusoidal pitch oscillations (0.2-1.0 Hz). Units with activity related to vertical vestibular stimulation and/or eye movements were classified as either vestibular units (n = 53), vestibular plus eye-position units (n = 30), pursuit units (n = 10), or miscellaneous units (n = 5), which had various combinations of head- and eye-movement sensitivities. Vestibular units discharged in relation to head rotation, but not to smooth eye movements. On average, these units fired approximately in phase with head velocity; however, a broad range of phase shifts was observed. The activities of 8% of the vestibular units were related to saccades. Vestibular plus eye-position units fired in relation to head velocity and eye position and, in addition, usually to eye velocity. Their discharge rates increased for eye and head movements in opposite directions. During combined head and eye movements, the modulation in unit activity was not significantly different from the sum of the modulations during each alone. For saccades, the unit firing rate either decreased to zero or was unaffected. Pursuit units discharged in relation to eye position, eye velocity, or both, but not to head movements alone. For saccades, unit activity usually either paused or was unaffected. The eye-movement-related activities of the vestibular plus eye-position and pursuit units were not significantly different. A quantitative comparison of their firing patterns suggests that vestibular, vestibular plus eye-position, and pursuit neurons in the vestibular nucleus could provide mossy fiber inputs to the flocculus. In addition, the vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons have discharge patterns similar to those of fibers recorded rostrally in the medial longitudinal fasciculus. Therefore, our data support the view that vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons are interneurons of the VOR.

Responses of fibers in medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) of alert monkeys during horizontal and vertical conjugate eye movements evoked by vestibular or visual stimuli

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1135-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. King ◽  
S. G. Lisberger ◽  
A. F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Medial Rectus ◽  
Discharge Pattern ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Fasciculus ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Behavioral Paradigm ◽  
Discharge Patterns ◽  
Almost All

Extracellular recordings were obtained from 37 histologically identified MLF fibers near the trochlear nucleus in alert monkeys trained to perform a visual tracking task and subjected to adequate horizontal and vertical vestibular stimulation. The behavioral paradigm permitted independent quantitative assessment of a fiber's response to eye or head movements. 2. According to their discharge pattern, almost all MLF fibers were placed in one of two classes: 1) Horizontal burst-tonic fibers (n = 20). During both vestibular and visually evoked eye movements, burst-tonic fibers discharged in strict relation to horizontal eye movements, exhibiting a burst of activity prior to on-direction saccades and steady firing related to horizontal eye position during fixations. 2) Vertical vestibular plus eye-position fibers (n = 14). Vertical fibers discharged in relation to vertical head velocity in the absence of eye movements and in relation to vertical eye position in the absence of head movement, and paused with saccades in any direction. 3. The quantitative similarity of horizontal burst-tonic fiber discharge to that of ipsilateral medial rectus oculomotoneurons suggests that burst-tonic fibers provide the major excitatory synaptic drive to medial rectus motoneurons during conjugate eye movements of vestibular or visual origin. 4. The discharge pattern of vertical vestibular plus eye-position fibers is significantly different from that of oculomotoneurons, suggesting that additional neural processing of vertical fiber information must occur in the mesencephalon. 5. The functional dichotomy of horizontal and vertical MLF fibers and their contrasting discharge patterns provide new evidence for the anatomic and functional separation of horizontal and vertical eye movement mechanisms in the pons and mesencephalon, respectively.

scholarly journals Reversible Inactivation of Monkey Superior Colliculus. I. Curvature of Saccadic Trajectory

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 2082-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Aizawa ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Intermediate Layers

Aizawa, Hiroshi and Robert H. Wurtz. Reversible inactivation of monkey superior colliculus. I. Curvature of saccadic trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2082–2096, 1998. The neurons in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) that discharge before saccadic eye movements can be divided into at least two types, burst and buildup neurons, and the differences in their characteristics are compatible with different functional contributions of the two cell types. It has been suggested that a spread of activity across the population of the buildup neurons during saccade generation may contribute to the control of saccadic eye movements. The influence of any such spread should be on both the horizontal and vertical components of the saccade because the map of the movement fields on the SC is a two-dimensional one; it should affect the trajectory of saccade. The present experiments used muscimol injections to inactivate areas within the SC to determine the functional contribution of such a spread of activity on the trajectory of the saccades. The analysis concentrated on saccades made to areas of the visual field that should be affected primarily by alteration of buildup neuron activity. Muscimol injections produced saccades with altered trajectories; they became consistently curved after the injection, and successive saccades to the same targets had similar curvatures. The curved saccades showed changes in their direction and speed at the very beginning of the saccade, and for those saccades that reached the target, the direction of the saccade was altered near the end to compensate for the initially incorrect direction. Postinjection saccades had lower peak speeds, longer durations, and longer latencies for initiation. The changes in saccadic trajectories resulting from muscimol injections, along with the previous observations on changes in speed of saccades with such injections, indicate that the SC is involved in influencing the eye position during the saccade as well as at the end of the saccade. The changes in trajectory when injections were made more rostral in the SC than the most active burst neurons also are consistent with a contribution of the buildup neurons to the control of the eye trajectory. The results do not, however, support the hypothesis that the buildup neurons in the SC act as a spatial integrator.

Visual Tracking Neurons in Primate Area MST Are Activated by Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements of an “Imaginary” Target

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 1489-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe J. Ilg ◽  
Peter Thier
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Tracking ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements

Because smooth-pursuit eye movements (SPEM) can be executed only in the presence of a moving target, it has been difficult to attribute the neuronal activity observed during the execution of these eye movements to either sensory processing or to motor preparation or execution. Previously, we showed that rhesus monkeys can be trained to perform SPEM directed toward an “imaginary” target defined by visual cues confined to the periphery of the visual field. The pursuit of an “imaginary” target provides the opportunity to elicit SPEM without stimulating visual receptive fields confined to the center of the visual field. Here, we report that a subset of neurons [85 “ imaginary” visual tracking (iVT)-neurons] in area MST of 3 rhesus monkeys were identically activated during pursuit of a conventional, foveal dot target and the “imaginary” target. Because iVT-neurons did not respond to the presentation of a moving “imaginary” target during fixation of a stationary dot, we are able to exclude that responses to pursuit of the “imaginary” target were artifacts of stimulation of the visual field periphery. Neurons recorded from the representation of the central parts of the visual field in neighboring area MT, usually vigorously discharging during pursuit of foveal targets, in no case responded to pursuit of the “imaginary” target. This dissociation between MT and MST neurons supports the view that pursuit responses of MT neurons are the result of target image motion, whereas those of iVT-neurons in area MST reflect an eye movement–related signal that is nonretinal in origin. iVT-neurons fell into two groups, depending on the properties of the eye movement–related signal. Whereas most of them (71%) encoded eye velocity, a minority showed responses determined by eye position, irrespective of whether eye position was changed by smooth pursuit or by saccades. Only the former group exhibited responses that led the eye movement, which is a prerequisite for a causal role in the generation of SPEM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document