scholarly journals On the relations of phase separation and Hi-C maps to epigenetics

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 191976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prim B. Singh ◽  
Andrew G. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Constitutive Heterochromatin ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Modified Dna ◽  
Contact Frequency ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cell

The relationship between compartmentalization of the genome and epigenetics is long and hoary. In 1928, Heitz defined heterochromatin as the largest differentiated chromatin compartment in eukaryotic nuclei. Müller's discovery of position-effect variegation in 1930 went on to show that heterochromatin is a cytologically visible state of heritable (epigenetic) gene repression. Current insights into compartmentalization have come from a high-throughput top-down approach where contact frequency (Hi-C) maps revealed the presence of compartmental domains that segregate the genome into heterochromatin and euchromatin. It has been argued that the compartmentalization seen in Hi-C maps is owing to the physiochemical process of phase separation. Oddly, the insights provided by these experimental and conceptual advances have remained largely silent on how Hi-C maps and phase separation relate to epigenetics. Addressing this issue directly in mammals, we have made use of a bottom-up approach starting with the hallmarks of constitutive heterochromatin, heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) and its binding partner the H3K9me2/3 determinant of the histone code. They are key epigenetic regulators in eukaryotes. Both hallmarks are also found outside mammalian constitutive heterochromatin as constituents of larger (0.1–5 Mb) heterochromatin -like domains and smaller (less than 100 kb) complexes. The well-documented ability of HP1 proteins to function as bridges between H3K9me2/3-marked nucleosomes contributes to polymer–polymer phase separation that packages epigenetically heritable chromatin states during interphase. Contacts mediated by HP1 ‘bridging’ are likely to have been detected in Hi-C maps, as evidenced by the B4 heterochromatic subcompartment that emerges from contacts between large KRAB-ZNF heterochromatin -like domains. Further, mutational analyses have revealed a finer, innate, compartmentalization in Hi-C experiments that probably reflect contacts involving smaller domains/complexes. Proteins that bridge (modified) DNA and histones in nucleosomal fibres—where the HP1–H3K9me2/3 interaction represents the most evolutionarily conserved paradigm—could drive and generate the fundamental compartmentalization of the interphase nucleus. This has implications for the mechanism(s) that maintains cellular identity, be it a terminally differentiated fibroblast or a pluripotent embryonic stem cell.

scholarly journals On the relation of phase separation and Hi-C maps to epigenetics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prim B. Singh ◽  
Andrew G. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Constitutive Heterochromatin ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Modified Dna ◽  
Contact Frequency ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cell

AbstractThe relationship between compartmentalisation of the genome and epigenetics is long and hoary. In 1928 Heitz defined heterochromatin as the largest differentiated chromatin compartment in eukaryotic nuclei. Müller’s (1930) discovery of position-effect variegation (PEV) went on to show that heterochromatin is a cytologically-visible state of heritable (epigenetic) gene repression. Current insights into compartmentalisation have come from a high-throughput top-down approach where contact frequency (Hi-C) maps revealed the presence of compartmental domains that segregate the genome into heterochromatin and euchromatin. It has been argued that the compartmentalisation seen in Hi-C maps is due to the physiochemical process of phase separation. Oddly, the insights provided by these experimental and conceptual advances have remained largely silent on how Hi-C maps and phase separation relate to epigenetics. Addressing this issue directly in mammals, we have made use of a bottom-up approach starting with the hallmarks of constitutive heterochromatin, heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) and its binding partner the H3K9me2/3 determinant of the histone code. They are key epigenetic regulators in eukaryotes. Both hallmarks are also found outside mammalian constitutive heterochromatin as constituents of larger (0.1-5Mb) heterochromatin-like domains and smaller (less than 100Kb) complexes. The well-documented ability of HP1 proteins to function as bridges between H3K9me2/3-marked nucleosomes enables cross-linking within and between chromatin fibres that contributes to polymer-polymer phase separation (PPPS) that packages epigenetically-heritable chromatin states during interphase. Contacts mediated by HP1 “bridging” are likely to have been detected in Hi-C maps, as evidenced by the B4 heterochromatic sub-compartment that emerges from contacts between large KRAB-ZNF heterochromatin-like domains. Further, mutational analyses have revealed a finer, innate, compartmentalisation in Hi-C experiments that likely reflect contacts involving smaller domains/complexes. Proteins that bridge (modified) DNA and histones in nucleosomal fibres – where the HP1-H3K9me2/3 interaction represents the most evolutionarily-conserved paradigm – could drive and generate the fundamental compartmentalisation of the interphase nucleus. This has implications for the mechanism(s) that maintains cellular identity, be it a terminally-differentiated fibroblast or a pluripotent embryonic stem cell.

scholarly journals Position Effect Variegation and Viability Are Both Sensitive to Dosage of Constitutive Heterochromatin in Drosophila

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1709-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Berloco ◽  
G. Palumbo ◽  
L. Piacentini ◽  
S. Pimpinelli ◽  
L. Fanti
Keyword(s):  
Constitutive Heterochromatin ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Effect Variegation

Genetic factors controlling white gene expression of the transposon AR4-24 at a telomere in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Balasov
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Restricted Pattern

The position effect of the AR 4-24 P[white, rosy] transposon was studied at cytological position 60F. Three copies of the transposon (within ~50-kb region) resulted in a spatially restricted pattern of white variegation. This pattern was modified by temperature and by removal of the Y chromosome, suggesting that it was due to classical heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation (PEV). In contrast with classical PEV, extra dose of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) suppressed white variegation and one dose enhanced it. The effect of Pc-G, trx-G, and other PEV suppressors was also tested. It was found that E(Pc)1, TrlR85, and mutations of Su(z)2C relieve AR 4-24- silencing and z1 enhances it. To explain the results obtained with these modifiers, it is proposed that PEV and telomeric position effect can counteract each other at this particular cytological site.Key words: position effect variegation, heterochromatin protein 1, Drosophila melanogaster.

scholarly journals A lot about a little dot — lessons learned from Drosophila melanogaster chromosome 4This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 29th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole C. Riddle ◽  
Christopher D. Shaffer ◽  
Sarah C.R. Elgin
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosomal Protein ◽  
Chromosome 4 ◽  
Fourth Chromosome ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1

The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster has a number of unique properties that make it a convenient model for the study of chromatin structure. Only 4.2 Mb overall, the 1.2 Mb distal arm of chromosome 4 seen in polytene chromosomes combines characteristics of heterochromatin and euchromatin. This domain has a repeat density of ~35%, comparable to some pericentric chromosome regions, while maintaining a gene density similar to that of the other euchromatic chromosome arms. Studies of position-effect variegation have revealed that heterochromatic and euchromatic domains are interspersed on chromosome 4, and both cytological and biochemical studies have demonstrated that chromosome 4 is associated with heterochromatic marks, such as heterochromatin protein 1 and histone 3 lysine 9 methylation. Chromosome 4 is also marked by POF (painting-of-fourth), a chromosome 4-specific chromosomal protein, and utilizes a dedicated histone methyltransferase, EGG. Studies of chromosome 4 have helped to shape our understanding of heterochromatin domains and their establishment and maintenance. In this review, we provide a synthesis of the work to date and an outlook to the future.

scholarly journals Drosophila small ovary encodes a zinc-finger repressor required for ovarian differentiation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Benner ◽  
Elias A. Castro ◽  
Cale Whitworth ◽  
Koen J.T. Venken ◽  
Haiwang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Tissue Degeneration ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Small Ovary

AbstractRepression is essential for coordinated cell type-specific gene regulation and controlling the expression of transposons. In the Drosophila ovary, stem cell regeneration and differentiation requires controlled gene expression, with derepression leading to tissue degeneration and ovarian tumors. Likewise, the ovary is acutely sensitive to deleterious consequences of transposon derepression. The small ovary (sov) locus was identified in a female sterile screen, and mutants show dramatic ovarian morphogenesis defects. We mapped the locus to the uncharacterized gene CG14438, which encodes a zinc-finger protein that colocalizes with the essential Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1a). We demonstrate that Sov functions to repress inappropriate cell signaling, silence transposons, and suppress position-effect variegation in the eye, suggesting a central role in heterochromatin stabilization.

Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1419-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kellum ◽  
B.M. Alberts
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Chromosome Morphology ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Centromeric Heterochromatin ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein

Heterochromatin protein 1 is associated with centromeric heterochromatin in Drosophila, mice, and humans. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding heterochromatin protein 1 in Drosophila, Suppressor of variegation2-5, decrease the mosaic repression observed for euchromatic genes that have been juxtaposed to centromeric heterochromatin. These heterochromatin protein 1 mutations not only suppress this position-effect variegation, but also cause recessive embryonic lethality. In this study, we analyze the latter phenotype in the hope of gaining insight into heterochromatin function. In our analyses of four alleles of Suppressor of variegation2-5, the lethality was found to be associated with defects in chromosome morphology and segregation. While some of these defects are seen throughout embryonic development, both the frequency and severity of the defects are greatest between cycles 10 and 14 when zygotic transcription of the Suppressor of variegation2-5 gene apparently begins. By this time in development, heterochromatin protein 1 levels are diminished by four-fold in a quarter of the embryos produced by parents that are both heterozygous for a null allele (Suppressor of variegation2-5(05)). In a live analysis of the phenotype, we find prophase to be lengthened by more than two-fold in Suppressor of variegation2-5(05) mutant embryos with subsequent defects in chromosome segregation. The elongated prophase suggests that the segregation phenotype is a consequence of defects in events that occur during prophase, either in chromosome condensation or kinetochore assembly or function. Immunostaining with an antibody against a centromerespecific antigen indicates that the kinetochores of most chromosomes are functional. The immunostaining results are more consistent with defects in chromosome condensation being responsible for the segregation phenotype.

Varied expression of a Y-linked P[w+] insert due to imprinting in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany S Haller ◽  
R C Woodruff
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
P Element ◽  
Parental Origin ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Parental Female

During gametogenesis, a gene can become imprinted affecting its expression in progeny. We have used the expression of a Y-linked P[w+]YAL transposable DNA element as a reporter system to investigate the effect of parental origination on the expression of the w+ insert. Expression of w+ was greater in male progeny when the Y chromosome, harboring the insert, was inherited from the parental male rather than from the parental female. Imprinting was not due to a genetic background influence in the males, since the only difference among the males was the parental origin of the Y chromosome. It was also observed that the genetic background can affect imprinting, since w+ expression was also higher in males when the Y was derived from C(1)DX attached-X parental females rather than from C(1)RM attached-X parental females. Though the heterochromatic imprinting mechanism is unknown, a mutated Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) gene, which is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation, increases expression of the w+ locus in the P[w+]YAL insert, indicating that HP1 may play a role in Y chromosome packaging. Key words: Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin, HP1, imprinting, P-element, Y chromosome.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Mottus ◽  
Richard E Sobel ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract For many years it has been noted that there is a correlation between acetylation of histones and an increase in transcriptional activity. One prediction, based on this correlation, is that hypomorphic or null mutations in histone deacetylase genes should lead to increased levels of histone acetylation and result in increased levels of transcription. It was therefore surprising when it was reported, in both yeast and fruit flies, that mutations that reduced or eliminated a histone deacetylase resulted in transcriptional silencing of genes subject to telomeric and heterochromatic position effect variegation (PEV). Here we report the first mutational analysis of a histone deacetylase in a multicellular eukaryote by examining six new mutations in HDAC1 of Drosophila melanogaster. We observed a suite of phenotypes accompanying the mutations consistent with the notion that HDAC1 acts as a global transcriptional regulator. However, in contrast to recent findings, here we report that specific missense mutations in the structural gene of HDAC1 suppress the silencing of genes subject to PEV. We propose that the missense mutations reported here are acting as antimorphic mutations that “poison” the deacetylase complex and propose a model that accounts for the various phenotypes associated with lesions in the deacetylase locus.

scholarly journals Mutual Correction of Faulty PCNA Subunits in Temperature-Sensitive Lethal mus209 Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 1721-1733
Author(s):  
Daryl S Henderson ◽  
Ulrich K Wiegand ◽  
David G Norman ◽  
David M Glover
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Female Sterility ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Mutant Genotype

Abstract Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) functions in DNA replication as a processivity factor for polymerases δ and ε, and in multiple DNA repair processes. We describe two temperature-sensitive lethal alleles (mus209B1 and mus2092735) of the Drosophila PCNA gene that, at temperatures permissive for growth, result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, suppression of position-effect variegation, and female sterility in which ovaries are underdeveloped and do not produce eggs. We show by mosaic analysis that the sterility of mus209B1 is partly due to a failure of germ-line cells to proliferate. Strikingly, mus209B1 and mus2092735 interact to restore partial fertility to heteroallelic females, revealing additional roles for PCNA in ovarian development, meiotic recombination, and embryogenesis. We further show that, although mus209B1 and mus2092735 homozygotes are each defective in repair of transposase-induced DNA double-strand breaks in somatic cells, this defect is substantially reversed in the heteroallelic mutant genotype. These novel mutations map to adjacent sites on the three-dimensional structure of PCNA, which was unexpected in the context of this observed interallelic complementation. These mutations, as well as four others we describe, reveal new relationships between the structure and function of PCNA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document