Exact solutions of the field equations: twist-free pure radiation fields

This note is intended to give a rough survey of the results obtained in the study of twist-free pure radiation fields in general relativity theory. Here we are using the following Definition. A space-time ( V 4 of signature +2) is called a pure radiation field if it contains a distortion-free geodetic null congruence (a so-called ray congruence ), and if it satisfies certain field equations which we will specify below (e.g. Einstein’s vacuum-field equations). A (null) congruence is called twist-free if it is hypersurface-orthogonal (or ‘normal’). The results listed below were obtained by introducing special (‘canonical’) co-ordinates adapted to the ray congruence. Detailed proofs were given by Robinson & Trautman (1962) and by Jordan, Kundt & Ehlers (1961) (see also Kundt 1961). For the sake of completeness we include in our survey the subclass of expanding fields, and make use of some formulae first obtained by Robinson & Trautman.

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 1450068 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Goldoni ◽  
M. F. A. da Silva ◽  
G. Pinheiro ◽  
R. Chan

In this paper, we have studied nonstationary radiative spherically symmetric spacetime, in general covariant theory (U(1) extension) of Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) gravity without the projectability condition and in the infrared (IR) limit. The Newtonian prepotential φ was assumed null. We have shown that there is not the analogue of the Vaidya's solution in the Hořava–Lifshitz Theory (HLT), as we know in the General Relativity Theory (GRT). Therefore, we conclude that the gauge field A should interact with the null radiation field of the Vaidya's spacetime in the HLT.


The well-known theorem that the motion of any conservative dynamical system can be determined from the “Principle of Least Action” or “Hamilton’s Principle” was carried over into General Relativity-Theory in 1915 by Hilbert, who showed that the field-equations of gravitation can be deduced very simply from a minimum-principle. Hilbert generalised his ideas into the assertion that all physical happenings (gravitational electrical, etc.) in the universe are determined by a scalar “world-function” H, being, in fact, such as to annul the variation of the integral ∫∫∫∫H√(−g)dx 0 dx 1 dx 2 dx 3 where ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) are the generalised co-ordinates which specify place and time, and g is (in the usual notation of the relativity-theory) the determinant of the gravitational potentials g v q , which specify the metric by means of the equation dx 2 = ∑ p, q g vq dx v dx q . In Hilbert’s work, the variation of the above integral was supposed to be due to small changes in the g vq 's and in the electromagnetic potentials, regarded as functions of x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 .


Author(s):  
H. A. Buchdahl

ABSTRACTField equations in general relativity theory have sometimes been generated by subjecting, in an invariant action integral, the components of linear connexion and the components of a covariant tensor of valence 2 to independent variation. The conceptual objections to this process, and some of the manifold formal difficulties inherent in it, are discussed in some detail. At the same time certain results obtained elsewhere are strengthened and in part corrected.


1956 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
HA Buchdahl

This paper deals with reciprocal static line-elements, previously defined by the author, the condition that their Ricci tensors vanish being no longer imposed. If the indices i, k run from 1 to n with the exception of the fixed index a (the line-elements being static with respect to xa) a certain quantity appears with the remarkable property that in a reciprocal transformation is invariant, whilst merely changes sign. is closely related to the Hamiltonian derivative of the Gaussian curvature, so that the general results obtained may be applied to the field equations of General Relativity Theory, with n=a=4. is then the total energy density; and formally every static distribution of matter has a " reciprocal distribution" associated with it. In particular, the equation of state of a distribution of fluid reciprocal to a distribution of fluid possessing a given equation of state may be obtained directly from the latter, i.e. without the solution of the field equations being known.


Symmetry ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gamal Nashed

In this study, we derive, in the framework of mimetic theory, charged and non-charged black hole solutions for spherically symmetric as well as flat horizon spacetimes. The asymptotic behavior of those black holes behave as flat or (A)dS spacetimes and coincide with the solutions derived before in general relativity theory. Using the field equations of non-linear electrodynamics mimetic theory we derive new black hole solutions with monopole and quadrupole terms. The quadruple term of those black holes is related by a constant so that its vanishing makes the solutions coincide with the linear Maxwell black holes. We study the singularities of those solutions and show that they possess stronger singularity than the ones known in general relativity. Among many things, we study the horizons as well as the heat capacity to see if the black holes derived in this study have thermodynamical stability or not.


Author(s):  
R. P. Akabari ◽  
U. K. Dave ◽  
L. K. Patel

AbstractA Demianski-type metric investigated in connection with Einstein's field equations corresponding to pure radiation fields. With aid of complex vectorical formalism, a general solution of these fiel equations is obtained. The solution is algebraically spcial. A particular case of the solution is considered which includes many known solutions; among them are the raiationg versions of some of Kinnersley's solutions.


1949 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Einstein ◽  
L. Infeld

The gravitational field manifests itself in the motion of bodies. Therefore the problem of determining the motion of such bodies from the field equations alone is of fundamental importance. This problem was solved for the first time some ten years ago and the equations of motion for two particles were then deduced [1]. A more general and simplified version of this problem was given shortly thereafter [2].Mr. Lewison pointed out to us, that from our approximation procedure, it does not follow that the field equations can be solved up to an arbitrarily high approximation. This is indeed true.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document