scholarly journals Copy number variants in the sheep genome detected using multiple approaches

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma M Jenkins ◽  
Michael E Goddard ◽  
Michael A Black ◽  
Rudiger Brauning ◽  
Benoit Auvray ◽  
...  

Background.Copy number variants (CNVs) are a type of polymorphism found to underlie phenotypic variation, both in humans and livestock. Most surveys of CNV in livestock have been conducted in the cattle genome, and often utilise only a single approach for the detection of copy number differences. Here we performed a study of CNV in sheep, using multiple methods to identify and characterise copy number changes. Comprehensive information from small pedigrees (trios) was collected using multiple platforms (array CGH, SNP chip and whole genome sequence data), with these data then analysed via multiple approaches to identify and verify CNVs.Results.In total, 3,488 autosomal CNV regions (CNVRs) were identified in this study, which substantially builds on an initial survey of the sheep genome that identified 135 CNVRs. The average length of the identified CNVRs was 19kb (range of 1kb to 3.6Mb), with shorter CNVRs being more frequent than longer CNVRs. The total length of all CNVRs was 67.6Mbps, which equates to 2.7% of the sheep autosomes. For individuals this value ranged from 0.24 to 0.55%, and the majority of CNVRs were identified in single animals. Rather than being uniformly distributed throughout the genome, CNVRs tended to be clustered. Application of three independent approaches for CNVR detection facilitated a comparison of validation rates. CNVs identified on the Roche-NimbleGen 2.1M CGH array generally had low validation rates with lower density arrays, while whole genome sequence data had the highest validation rate (>60%).Conclusions.This study represents the first comprehensive survey of the distribution, prevalence and characteristics of CNVR in sheep. Multiple approaches were used to detect CNV regions and it appears that the best method for verifying CNVR on a large scale involves using a combination of detection methodologies. The characteristics of the 3,488 autosomal CNV regions identified in this study are comparable to other CNV regions reported in the literature and provide a valuable and sizeable addition to the small subset of published sheep CNVs.

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 5515-5525 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mielczarek ◽  
M. Frąszczak ◽  
R. Giannico ◽  
G. Minozzi ◽  
John L. Williams ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1881-1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Ha ◽  
Andrew Roth ◽  
Jaswinder Khattra ◽  
Julie Ho ◽  
Damian Yap ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Trost ◽  
Susan Walker ◽  
Zhuozhi Wang ◽  
Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram ◽  
Jeffrey R. MacDonald ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amnon Koren ◽  
Dashiell J Massey ◽  
Alexa N Bracci

Abstract Motivation Genomic DNA replicates according to a reproducible spatiotemporal program, with some loci replicating early in S phase while others replicate late. Despite being a central cellular process, DNA replication timing studies have been limited in scale due to technical challenges. Results We present TIGER (Timing Inferred from Genome Replication), a computational approach for extracting DNA replication timing information from whole genome sequence data obtained from proliferating cell samples. The presence of replicating cells in a biological specimen leads to non-uniform representation of genomic DNA that depends on the timing of replication of different genomic loci. Replication dynamics can hence be observed in genome sequence data by analyzing DNA copy number along chromosomes while accounting for other sources of sequence coverage variation. TIGER is applicable to any species with a contiguous genome assembly and rivals the quality of experimental measurements of DNA replication timing. It provides a straightforward approach for measuring replication timing and can readily be applied at scale. Availability and Implementation TIGER is available at https://github.com/TheKorenLab/TIGER. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online


Data in Brief ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 106416
Author(s):  
Asset Daniyarov ◽  
Askhat Molkenov ◽  
Saule Rakhimova ◽  
Ainur Akhmetova ◽  
Zhannur Nurkina ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynsey K. Whitacre ◽  
Jesse L. Hoff ◽  
Robert D. Schnabel ◽  
Sara Albarella ◽  
Francesca Ciotola ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yasir Nawaz ◽  
Rodrigo Pelicioni Savegnago ◽  
Cedric Gondro

Abstract In this study, we detected genome wide footprints of selection in Hanwoo and Angus beef cattle using different allele frequency and haplotype-based methods based on imputed whole genome sequence data. Our dataset included 13,202 Angus and 10,437 Hanwoo animals with 10,057,633 and 13,241,550 imputed SNPs, respectively. A subset of data with 6,873,624 common SNPs between the two populations was used to estimate signatures of selection parameters, both within (runs of homozygosity and extended haplotype homozygosity) and between (allele fixation index, extended haplotype homozygosity) the breeds in order to infer evidence of selection. We observed that correlations between various measures of selection ranged between 0.01 to 0.42. Assuming these parameters were complementary to each other, we combined them into a composite selection signal to identify regions under selection in both beef breeds. The composite signal was based on the average of fractional ranks of individual selection measures for every SNP. We identified some selection signatures that were common between the breeds while others were independent. We also observed that more genomic regions were selected in Angus as compared to Hanwoo. Candidate genes within significant genomic regions may help explain mechanisms of adaptation, domestication history and loci for important traits in Angus and Hanwoo cattle. In the future, we will use the top SNPs under selection for genomic prediction of carcass traits in both breeds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document