scholarly journals Visual outcome of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections at the University College Hospital, Ibadan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tunji Sunday Oluleye ◽  
Yewande Olubunmi Babalola ◽  
Oluwole Majekodunmi ◽  
Modupe Ijaduola ◽  
Adeyemi Timothy Adewole
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Number Of Injections

AbstractAimTo evaluate the four-year outcome of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in an eye unit in sub-Saharan Africa.MethodologyThis retrospective study included 182 eyes of 172 patients managed in the vitreoretinal unit between 2016 and 2019 who were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) with at least one year of follow up. The outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over one year of follow-up, the number of injections taken and complications.ResultsThe mean age was 61.1 ± 16.3 years (M: F of 1:1.1) and about 62.1% were > 60 years. A total of 330 injections were given during the period audited. The mean number of injections was 1.8 ± 0.93. Ninety-four (51.7%) eyes had only one injection while 33 (18.1%), 50 (27.5%) and 5 (2.7%) had 2, 3 and 4 injections, respectively. About 78.5% had moderate-severe visual impairment at baseline and 44.5%, 16.4%,12.6% and 7.1% at 1, 3, 6- and 12-months post injections, respectively. The mean BCVA improved for all eyes from 1.67 ±0.91 logMAR at baseline to 1.50±1.27 logMAR at one year. The logMAR letters gained was 23 at 1 month and 8.25 at 1 year with a statistically significant association between increasing number of injections and improved visual outcome (p= 0.015). One patient each developed endophthalmitis (0.6%) and inferior retinal detachment (0.6%) post-injection.ConclusionVisual acuity gain was recorded in patients who had at least two intravitreal Anti-VEGF injections in 1 year.

scholarly journals Association between Retinal Thickness Variability and Visual Acuity Outcome during Maintenance Therapy Using Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1024
Author(s):  
Timothy Y. Y. Lai ◽  
Ricky Y. K. Lai
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Thickness Variability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Previous studies based on clinical trial data have demonstrated that greater fluctuations in retinal thickness during the course of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is associated with poorer visual acuity outcomes. However, it was unclear whether similar findings would be observed in real-world clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate the association between retinal thickness variability and visual outcomes in eyes receiving anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD using pro re nata treatment regimen. A total of 64 eyes which received intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (bevacizumab, ranibizumab or aflibercept) for the treatment of nAMD were evaluated. Variability in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield thickness (CST) was calculated from the standard deviation (SD) values of all follow-up visits after three loading doses from month 3 to month 24. Eyes were divided into quartiles based on the OCT CST variability values and the mean best-corrected visual acuity values at 2 years were compared. At baseline, the mean ± SD logMAR visual acuity and CST were 0.59 ± 0.39 and 364 ± 113 µm, respectively. A significant correlation was found between CST variability and visual acuity at 2 years (Spearman’s ρ = 0.54, p < 0.0001), indicating that eyes with lower CST variability had better visual acuity at 2 years. Eyes with the least CST variability were associated with the highest mean visual acuity improvement at 2 years (quartile 1: +9.7 letters, quartile 2: +1.1 letters, quartile 3: −2.5 letters, quartile 4: −9.5 letters; p = 0.018). No significant difference in the number of anti-VEGF injections was found between the four CST variability quartile groups (p = 0.21). These findings showed that eyes undergoing anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD with more stable OCT CST variability during the follow-up period were associated with better visual outcomes. Clinicians should consider adopting treatment strategies to reduce CST variability during the treatment course for nAMD.

scholarly journals Efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vitrectomized eyes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252006
Author(s):  
Yongseok Mun ◽  
Kyu Hyung Park ◽  
Sang Jun Park ◽  
Se Joon Woo
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Multiple Injections ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in vitrectomized eyes. Methods The medical records were reviewed of nAMD patients treated with anti-VEGF agents who previously underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). PPV was performed with complete posterior vitreous detachment induction. Results A total of 44 eyes from 44 patients were included. The mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was 478.50 ± 156.93 μm at baseline, 414.25 ± 143.55 μm (86.6% of baseline) at 1 month after first injection (P < 0.001), and 386.75 ± 141.45 μm (80.8% of baseline) after monthly multiple injections (2.30 ± 1.07; range, 1–5) (P < 0.001). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.85 ± 0.57 at baseline, 0.86 ± 0.63 after the first injection, and 0.84 ± 0.64 after monthly multiple injections. BCVA improved in 39.5% at 1 month after first injection and 45.2% at 1 month after monthly multiple injections. In the subgroup analysis, CFT of eyes with the posterior capsule decreased significantly to 85.8% and 79.8% of baseline values at 1 month after the first injection and after monthly multiple injections, respectively. CFT of eyes without the posterior capsule decreased to 91.6% and 87.4% of baseline values at 1 month after the first injection and after monthly multiple injections, respectively, without statistical significance. Conclusion Monthly injections of Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents induced favorable anatomical improvement and vision maintenance in vitrectomized eyes with nAMD.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed Treatment Comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Sheng Gao ◽  
Xun Li ◽  
Xi Huang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Number Of Injections

Background: We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy to identify its utilization and prioritization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Methods: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the recommended anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and conbercept) under various therapeutic regimens. Outcomes of interest included the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), serious adverse events, the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters or lost &lt;15 letters in BCVA, the mean change in central retinal thickness, and the number of injections within 12 months.Results: Twenty-seven trials including 10,484 participants and eighteen treatments were identified in the network meta-analysis. The aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly, ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&amp;E, and brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w regimens had better visual efficacy. Brolucizumab had absolute superiority in anatomical outcomes and a relative advantage of safety, as well as good performance of aflibercept 2 mg T&amp;E. The proactive regimens had slightly better efficacy but a slightly increased number of injections versus the reactive regimen. Bevacizumab had a statistically non-significant trend toward a lower degree of efficacy and safety.Conclusion: The visual efficacy of four individual anti-VEGF drugs is comparable. Several statistically significant differences were observed considering special anti-VEGF regimens, suggesting that brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w, aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly or T&amp;E, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&amp;E are the ideal anti-VEGF regimens for nAMD patients. In the current landscape, based on the premise of equivalent efficacy and safety, the optimal choice of anti-VEGF monotherapies seems mandatory to obtain maximal benefit.

scholarly journals Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Young Hwan Bae ◽  
Seong Mi Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
So Hyun Bae ◽  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose. To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods. This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis. Results. During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR ( P = 0.042 ). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm ( P = 0.887 ). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections ( P < 0.001 ). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P = 0.048 ). Conclusions. In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

scholarly journals Real world evidence on 5661 patients treated for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal dexamethasone or macular laser

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-315836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Gale ◽  
Maria Pikoula ◽  
Aaron Y Lee ◽  
Spiros Denaxas ◽  
Catherine Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Oedema ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Background/aimsClinical trials suggest anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is more effective than intravitreal dexamethasone as treatment for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. This study asks if ‘real world’ data from a larger and more diverse population, followed for a longer period, also support this conclusion.MethodsData collected to support routine care at 27 NHS (National Health Service) Trusts between February 2002 and September 2017 contained 5661 treatment-naive patients with a single mode of treatment for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and no history of cataract surgery either during or recently preceding the treatment. Number of treatment visits and change in visual acuity from baseline was plotted for three treatment groups (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), intravitreal dexamethasone, macular laser) for up to 3 years.ResultsMean baseline visual acuity was 57.1/53.1/62.3 letters in the anti-VEGF/dexamethasone/macular laser groups, respectively. This changed to 66.72 (+9.6)/57.6 (+4.5)/63.2 (+0.9) at 12 months. Adequate numbers allowed analysis at 18 months for all groups (66.6 (+9.5)/56.1 (+3.0)/60.8 (-1.5)) and for anti-VEGF at 36 months (68.0, +10.9) Mean number of treatments were 5.1/1.5/1.2 at 12 months, 5.9/1.7/1.2 at 18 months for all three groups and 10.3 at 36 months for anti-VEGF.ConclusionsVisual acuity improvements were higher and more sustained with anti-VEGF. Higher treatment burden occurred with anti-VEGF but this reduced over 36 months. Patients with better vision at baseline than those in the clinical trials maintained high levels of vision with both anti-VEGF and dexamethasone.

Twenty-four-month outcomes of inflammatory choroidal neovascularisation treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: a comparison between two treatment regimens

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 1052-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Invernizzi ◽  
Francesco Pichi ◽  
Richard Symes ◽  
Sophia Zagora ◽  
Aniruddha Kishandutt Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Choroidal Neovascularisation ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factors ◽  
Established Treatment ◽  
Number Of Injections

Background and aimThere is still no established treatment regimen for eyes with inflammatory choroidal neovascularisation (iCNV) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. This study compared the 24-month outcomes of two treatment regimens of anti-VEGF injections in eyes with iCNV.MethodsEyes with iCNV treated with anti-VEGF injections were divided into two groups: eyes treated with a loading phase of 3 monthly injections and then re-treated as needed (LOADING group) and eyes treated as needed from the beginning (PRN group). Visual acuity (VA), number of injections and iCNV recurrences at 24 months were compared between the groups.ResultsEighty-two eyes were included, 42 in the LOADING and 40 in the PRN group. Baseline VA (mean(SD)) was 57.3 (15.8) letters in the LOADING vs 60.7 (15.6) letters in the PRN group (p=0.32). The VA (mean (95% CI)) increased at 3 months (+14.8 (10.6 to 18.9) and +11.2 (6.4 to 16) letters in the LOADING and PRN group, respectively) and remained significantly higher than baseline over the entire follow-up in both groups (all p<0.001). At 24 months, there was no difference in VA between the LOADING and PRN group (72.3 (14.0) vs 74.7 (11.3) letters, p=0.36) but the LOADING group received significantly more injections (median (Q1–Q3)) than the PRN (4.5 (3–7) vs 2.5 (2–3.2), p<0.0001). The iCNV recurrences were similar in both groups.ConclusionsiCNV responded well to anti-VEGF with significant and sustained VA improvement. The loading phase did not confer any advantage in terms of outcomes. PRN regimen from the beginning was as effective as more intensive treatment.

scholarly journals Outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in real-life setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 959-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Kataja ◽  
Pekko Hujanen ◽  
Heini Huhtala ◽  
Kai Kaarniranta ◽  
Anja Tuulonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

AimsTo evaluate outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the real-life setting and to compare incidence of ocular serious adverse events (SAE) after injections administered by nurses and physicians.MethodsRetrospective, single-centre study. Medical records of patients receiving anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD between 2008 and 2013 with three-loading-dose regimen were evaluated. Outcome measures were baseline visual acuity (VA), change in VA, number of intravitreal injections, incidence of ocular SAE and patients’ baseline characteristics affecting VA change. In addition, the number of injections per 1000 citizens living in the serving area and per individuals over 65 years old were estimated.Results1349 eyes in 1117 patients received a total of 11 562 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Twenty-one per cent of patients received treatment for both eyes. The mean baseline Snellen VA was 0.32. The mean change of VA from baseline was +2, +2 and ±0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and the mean numbers of injections were 5.7, 4.7 and 4.9 at years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was a negative correlation between baseline VA and change of VA. Incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.086%. No difference in the incidence of ocular SAE was identified between injections given by nurses or by physicians. The number of intravitreal injections per all citizens was 9 per 1000 inhabitants and 45 per 1000 inhabitants over 65 years.ConclusionThe VA was maintained at the baseline level (±0 letters) with the mean of 15.3 anti-VEGF injections in real-world clinical practice during 3-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Multicentre study of 4626 patients assesses the effectiveness, safety and burden of two categories of treatments for central retinal vein occlusion: intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and intravitreal Ozurdex injections

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317306
Author(s):  
Richard Gale ◽  
Claire Gill ◽  
Maria Pikoula ◽  
Aaron Y Lee ◽  
Rachel L W Hanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Central Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Treatment Burden ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Central Retinal Vein ◽  
Number Of Injections

Background/AimsTo assess the effectiveness, burden and safety of two categories of treatment for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO): intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and dexamethasone (Ozurdex).MethodsA retrospective analysis of Medisoft electronic medical record (EMR) data from 27 National Health Service sites in the UK identified 4626 treatment-naive patients with a single mode of treatment for macular oedema secondary to CRVO. Statistics describing the overall CRVO patient cohort and individual patient subpopulations stratified by treatment type were generated. Mean age at baseline, gender, ethnicity, social deprivation and visual acuity (VA) follow-up was reported. Absolute and change in VA using ETDRS are used to describe treatment effectiveness, the number of injections and visits used to describe treatment burden and endophthalmitis rates as a marker of treatment safety.ResultsMean VA was 47.9 and 45.3 EDTRS letters in the anti-VEGF and Ozurdex groups, respectively. This changed to 57.9/53.7 at 12 months, 58.3/46.9 at 18 months and 59.4/51.0 at 36 months. Mean number of injections were 5.6/1.6 at 12 months, 6.0/1.7 at 18 months and 7.0/1.8 at 36 months. Endophthalmitis rates were 0.003% (n=4) for the anti-VEGF group and 0.09% (n=1) for the Ozurdex group.ConclusionsVA improvements were greater and more sustained with anti-VEGF treatment. Lower starting acuity resulted in bigger gains in both groups, while higher starting acuity resulted in higher VA at 36 months. Although treatment burden was greater with anti-VEGF, Ozurdex was associated with higher rates of endophthalmitis.

Retinal Pigment Epithelium Tears After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayoung Ahn ◽  
Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang ◽  
Joon Hong Sohn ◽  
Gisung Son
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Pigment Epithelium ◽  
Retinal Pigment ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Rpe Tear

Purpose: To assess the visual prognostic factors of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tears and describe their clinical features. Methods: The medical records of treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The incidence of RPE tears was 1.36% (10 out of 733 eyes). The type of anti-VEGF agent administered did not affect the incidence (p = 0.985). The median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 10 patients decreased after an RPE tear (0.4 to 0.6 logMAR); however, subsequent injections restored the BCVA to a level similar to that before the RPE tear (0.4 logMAR, p = 0.436). Central macular thickness improved significantly during the study (794.4 to 491.9 μm, p = 0.013). The final BCVA was positively correlated with the BCVA before and immediately after the RPE tear (p = 0.025 and 0.002, respectively) and was weakly correlated with foveal involvement of the RPE tear (p = 0.061). Conclusion: The incidence of RPE tears did not differ according to the type of anti-VEGF agent. The final BCVA was proportional to the BCVA before and after RPE tears. Continuous treatment with anti-VEGF after the occurrence of RPE tears can benefit the final visual acuity and macular anatomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document