scholarly journals Selective attention is insensitive to reward and to dopamine in Parkinson’s disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Pilgrim ◽  
Zhen-Yi Andy Ou ◽  
Madeleine Sharp

AbstractPatients with Parkinson’s disease exhibit reduced reward sensitivity in addition to early cognitive deficits, among which attention impairments are common. Attention allocation is controlled at multiple levels and recent work has shown that reward, in addition to its role in the top-down goal-directed control of attention, also guides the automatic allocation of attention resources, a process thought to rely on striatal dopamine. Whether Parkinson’s patients, due to their striatal dopamine loss, suffer from an inability to use reward information to guide the allocation of their attention is unknown. To address this question, we tested Parkinson’s patients (n=43) ON and OFF their dopaminergic medication, and compared them to a group of older controls (n=31). We used a standard two-phase attention capture task in which subjects were first implicitly trained to make colour-reward associations. In the second phase, the previously reward-associated colours were used as distractors in a visual search task. We found that patients did not use reward information to modulate their attention; they were similarly distracted by the presence of low and high-reward distractors. However, contrary to our predictions, we did not find evidence that dopamine modulated this inability to use reward to guide attention allocation. Additionally, we found slightly increased overall distractibility in Parkinson’s patients compared to older controls, but interestingly, the degree of distractibility was not influenced by dopamine replacement. Our results suggest that loss of reward-guided attention allocation may contribute to early attention deficits and raise the possibility that this inability to prioritize cognitive resource allocation could contribute to executive deficits more broadly in Parkinson’s disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. D. Pilgrim ◽  
Zhen-Yi Andy Ou ◽  
Madeleine Sharp

AbstractAn important aspect of managing a limited cognitive resource like attention is to use the reward value of stimuli to prioritize the allocation of attention to higher-value over lower-value stimuli. Recent evidence suggests this depends on dopaminergic signaling of reward. In Parkinson’s disease, both reward sensitivity and attention are impaired, but whether these deficits are directly related to one another is unknown. We tested whether Parkinson’s patients use reward information when automatically allocating their attention and whether this is modulated by dopamine replacement. We compared patients, tested both ON and OFF dopamine replacement medication, to older controls using a standard attention capture task. First, participants learned the different reward values of stimuli. Then, these reward-associated stimuli were used as distractors in a visual search task. We found that patients were generally distracted by the presence of the distractors but that the degree of distraction caused by the high-value and low-value distractors was similar. Furthermore, we found no evidence to support the possibility that dopamine replacement modulates the effect of reward on automatic attention allocation. Our results suggest a possible inability in Parkinson’s patients to use the reward value of stimuli when automatically allocating their attention, and raise the possibility that reward-driven allocation of resources may affect the adaptive modulation of other cognitive processes.


Brain ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh Christopher ◽  
Connie Marras ◽  
Sarah Duff-Canning ◽  
Yuko Koshimori ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1541-1549
Author(s):  
Seok Jong Chung ◽  
Sangwon Lee ◽  
Han Soo Yoo ◽  
Yang Hyun Lee ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Striatal dopamine deficits play a key role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and several non-motor symptoms (NMSs) have a dopaminergic component. Objective: To investigate the association between early NMS burden and the patterns of striatal dopamine depletion in patients with de novo PD. Methods: We consecutively recruited 255 patients with drug-naïve early-stage PD who underwent 18F-FP-CIT PET scans. The NMS burden of each patient was assessed using the NMS Questionnaire (NMSQuest), and patients were divided into the mild NMS burden (PDNMS-mild) (NMSQuest score <6; n = 91) and severe NMS burden groups (PDNMS-severe) (NMSQuest score >9; n = 90). We compared the striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) activity between the groups. Results: Patients in the PDNMS-severe group had more severe parkinsonian motor signs than those in the PDNMS-mild group, despite comparable DAT activity in the posterior putamen. DAT activity was more severely depleted in the PDNMS-severe group in the caudate and anterior putamen compared to that in the PDMNS-mild group. The inter-sub-regional ratio of the associative/limbic striatum to the sensorimotor striatum was lower in the PDNMS-severe group, although this value itself lacked fair accuracy for distinguishing between the patients with different NMS burdens. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that PD patients with severe NMS burden exhibited severe motor deficits and relatively diffuse dopamine depletion throughout the striatum. These findings suggest that the level of NMS burden could be associated with distinct patterns of striatal dopamine depletion, which could possibly indicate the overall pathological burden in PD.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer K. W. Schwarting ◽  
Marco Sedelis ◽  
Katja Hofele ◽  
Georg W. Auburger ◽  
Joseph P. Huston

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1037-1045
Author(s):  
Kosei Hirata ◽  
Takaaki Hattori ◽  
Satoko Kina ◽  
Qingmeng Chen ◽  
Masahiro Ohara ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 652-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Pal ◽  
Bichun Ouyang ◽  
Leo Verhagen ◽  
Geidy Serrano ◽  
Holly A. Shill ◽  
...  

Synapse ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Chalon ◽  
Patrick Emond ◽  
Sylvie Bodard ◽  
Marie-Paule Vilar ◽  
Cynthia Thiercelin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document