scholarly journals Potential COVID-19 vaccination opportunities in primary care practices in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Basu ◽  
Rebecca Weintraub ◽  
Ishani Ganguli ◽  
Russell Phillips ◽  
Robert Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

AbstractRapid, widespread COVID-19 vaccination is critical to pandemic mitigation and recovery. To help policymakers interested in further enhancing primary care delivery of COVID-19 vaccines, it is important to estimate the absolute number of vaccination opportunities, and identify how these opportunities may fall disproportionately among different communities given the unequal way that COVID-19 falls upon communities of color, low-income, and rural communities. To quantify the potential benefits of greater primary care engagement in vaccination efforts, we estimated the number of potential vaccination opportunities (PVOs) in primary care in the remaining calendar months of year 2021, and the possible uptake if we supplied enough vaccine to primary care practices to fulfill their opportunities. To estimate how many potential vaccination opportunities (PVOs) may occur in primary care, we used three sets of data, analyzing the latest available waves of the following: (i) the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS, 2016, N = 677 providers); (ii) the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, 2018, N = 29,839 individuals in 29,839 households); and (iii) the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, 2018, N = 40,025 individuals in 14,500 households). Per the NAMCS data, which provide a nationally-representative sample of ambulatory care visits, primary care physicians normally provide 40.2 million primary care visits per month. The majority of the primary care utilization is absorbed by those aged 16 to 64 years old who are not otherwise priority groups (i.e., not having chronic diseases as defined by ACIP) but the second large group of visits are those with a chronic disease (27.2% of all visits). As compared to the NAMCS data providing an estimate of care from the perspective of providers, the overall sample in NHIS provides a view of primary care access and utilization from a population perspective. Per NHIS, 34% of the civilian US population saw a generalist physician in the prior calendar year, or 109.8 million people. Overall, we would estimate that over the latter half of calendar year 2021, approximately 15 million potential vaccine opportunities per month would be available through US primary care practices.

scholarly journals Understanding primary care-oncology relationships within a changing healthcare environment

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Tsui ◽  
Jenna Howard ◽  
Denalee O’Malley ◽  
William L. Miller ◽  
Shawna V. Hudson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Formal System ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Background Management of care transitions from primary care into and out of oncology is critical for optimal care of cancer patients and cancer survivors. There is limited understanding of existing primary care-oncology relationships within the context of the changing health care environment. Methods Through a comparative case study of 14 innovative primary care practices throughout the United States (U.S.), we examined relationships between primary care and oncology settings to identify attributes contributing to strengthened relationships in diverse settings. Field researchers observed practices for 10–12 days, recording fieldnotes and conducting interviews. We created a reduced dataset of all text related to primary care-oncology relationships, and collaboratively identified patterns to characterize these relationships through an inductive “immersion/crystallization” analysis process. Results Nine of the 14 practices discussed having either formal or informal primary care-oncology relationships. Nearly all formal primary care-oncology relationships were embedded within healthcare systems. The majority of private, independent practices had more informal relationships between individual primary care physicians and specific oncologists. Practices with formal relationships noted health system infrastructure that facilitates transfer of patient information and timely referrals. Practices with informal relationships described shared commitment, trust, and rapport with specific oncologists. Regardless of relationship type, challenges reported by primary care settings included lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities during cancer treatment and beyond. Conclusions With the rapid transformation of U.S. healthcare towards system ownership of primary care practices, efforts are needed to integrate strengths of informal primary care-oncology relationships in addition to formal system driven relationships.

Enhancing the Safe and Effective Management of Chronic Pain in Accountable Care Organization Primary Care Practices in Kentucky

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selam Wubu ◽  
Laura Lee Hall ◽  
Paula Straub ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Jill A. Marsteller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Chronic pain is a prevalent chronic condition with significant burden and economic impact in the United States. Chronic pain is particularly abundant in primary care, with an estimated 52% of chronic pain patients obtaining care from primary care physicians (PCPs). However, PCPs often lack adequate training and have limited time and resources to effectively manage chronic pain. Chronic pain management is complex in nature because of high co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and other medical comorbidities in patients. This article describes a quality improvement initiative conducted by the American College of Physicians (ACP), in collaboration with the Kentucky ACP Chapter, and the Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, to enhance chronic pain management in 8 primary care practices participating in Accountable Care Organizations in Kentucky, with a goal of enhancing the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with chronic pain.

Uninsured Children With Psychosocial Problems: Primary Care Management

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 106 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 930-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. McInerny ◽  
Peter G. Szilagyi ◽  
George E. Childs ◽  
Richard C. Wasserman ◽  
Kelly J. Kelleher
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Psychosocial Problems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Behavior Study ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Uninsured Children ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Objective. Nearly 14% of children in the United States are uninsured. We compared the prevalence of psychosocial problems and mental health services received by insured and uninsured children in primary care practices. Methods. The Child Behavior Study was a cohort study conducted by Pediatric Research in Office Settings and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. Four hundred one primary care clinicians enrolled an average sample of 55 consecutive children (4–15 years old) per clinician. Results. Of the 13 401 visits to clinicians with 3 or more uninsured patients, 12 518 were by insured children (93.4%) and 883 were by uninsured children (6.6%). A higher percentage of adolescents, Hispanic children, those with unmarried parents, and those with less educated parents were uninsured. According to clinicians, uninsured children and insured children had similar rates of psychosocial problems (19%) and severe psychosocial problems (2%). For children with a clinician-identified psychosocial problem, we found no differences in clinician-reported counseling, medication use, or referral to mental health professionals. Conclusions. Among children served in primary care practices, uninsured children have similar prevalence of clinician-identified psychosocial and mental health problems compared with insured children. Within their practices, clinicians managed uninsured children much the same way as insured children.psychosocial problems, uninsured children, pediatrics, family medicine, primary care.

Delivery of Survivorship Care by Primary Care Physicians: The Perspective of Breast Cancer Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun J. Mao ◽  
Marjorie A. Bowman ◽  
Carrie T. Stricker ◽  
Angela DeMichele ◽  
Linda Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
General Care

Purpose Most of the 182,460 women diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States this year will become long-term survivors. Helping these women transition from active treatment to survivorship is a challenge that involves both oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aims to describe postmenopausal breast cancer survivors' (BCS) perceptions of PCP-related survivorship care. Patients and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 300 BCSs seen in an outpatient breast oncology clinic at a large university hospital. The primary outcome measure was a seven-item self-reported measure on perceived survivorship care (Cronbach's α = .89). Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with perceived care delivery. Results Overall, BCSs rated PCP-related survivorship care as 65 out of 100 (standard deviation = 17). The areas of PCP-related care most strongly endorsed were general care (78%), psychosocial support (73%), and health promotion (73%). Fewer BCSs perceived their PCPs as knowledgeable about cancer follow-up (50%), late effects of cancer therapies (59%), or treating symptoms related to cancer or cancer therapies (41%). Only 28% felt that their PCPs and oncologists communicated well. In a multivariate regression analysis, nonwhite race and level of trust in the PCP were significantly associated with higher perceived level of PCP-related survivorship care (P = .001 for both). Conclusion Although BCSs perceived high quality of general care provided by their PCPs, they were not as confident with their PCPs' ability to deliver cancer-specific survivorship care. Interventions need to be tested to improve oncology-primary care communication and PCP knowledge of cancer-specific survivorship care.

scholarly journals Recruiting Practices for Change Initiatives Is Hard: Findings From EvidenceNOW

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Sweeney ◽  
Jennifer D. Hall ◽  
Sarah S. Ono ◽  
Leah Gordon ◽  
David Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Change Initiatives ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Observational Site ◽  
State Initiatives ◽  
Grant Proposals ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Engaging primary care practices in initiatives designed to enhance quality, reduce costs, and promote safety is challenging as practices are already participating in numerous projects and mandated programs designed to improve care delivery and quality. Recruiters must expand their recruitment tools to engage today’s practices in quality improvement. Using grant proposals, online diaries, observational site visits, and interviews with key stakeholders, the authors identify successful practice recruitment strategies in the EvidenceNOW initiative, which aimed to recruit approximately 1500 small- to medium-sized primary care practices. Recruiters learned they needed to articulate how participation in EvidenceNOW aligned with other initiatives and could help practices succeed with federal and state initiatives, recognition programs, and existing or future payment requirements. Recruiters, initiative leaders, and funders must now consider how their efforts align with ongoing initiatives to successfully recruit and engage practices, ease practice burden, and encourage participation in efforts that support practice transformation.

Measuring the Process of Preventive Service Delivery in Primary Care Practices for Children

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 106 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 879-885
Author(s):  
Kathleen L. Gest ◽  
Peter Margolis ◽  
W. Clayton Bordley ◽  
Jayne Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Preventive Services ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Preventive Service ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices ◽  
Key Steps

Background. Children may fall behind on preventive services because they do not receive needed services at the time of an office visit (a missed opportunity). However, methods are needed to measure problems in the care delivery process that lead to missed opportunities. We developed a method to examine the key steps in the preventive service delivery process and identify problems; we assessed the feasibility and validity of the method in primary care practices for children. Methods. Using 3 data collection methods, we measured key steps in the process of preventive service delivery in primary care offices: a chart audit was used to measure each child's preventive service status before and after an office visit, a brief parent exit interview was used to assess preventive service delivery not documented in the chart, and a staff checklist was used to assess the role of nursing and other office staff. The feasibility of using this combination of measures to identify problems in the care delivery process was evaluated in 3 representative primary care practices (2 pediatric, 1 family practice) among children 5 years and younger. Results. The measurement method was implemented in all 3 practices. The validity of the method was supported by its ability to detect differences among practices in the proportion of children eligible for immunizations and screening tests and in the proportion of children undergoing key steps in the process of preventive service delivery. The practice with the lowest proportion of children whose charts were screened for preventive services needs had the lowest performance of preventive services. Conclusions. It is possible to assess specific elements in the process of preventive service delivery in primary care practices. Use of this approach may help practices design and monitor interventions to improve the quality of preventive care delivery.

scholarly journals Acute Care Utilization by Dementia Caregivers Within Urban Primary Care Practices

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1736-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy C. Schubert ◽  
Malaz Boustani ◽  
Christopher M. Callahan ◽  
Anthony J. Perkins ◽  
Siu Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Dementia Caregivers ◽  
Acute Care Utilization ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Home-Based Primary Care Practices in the United States: Current State and Quality Improvement Approaches

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Leff ◽  
Christine M. Weston ◽  
Sarah Garrigues ◽  
Kanan Patel ◽  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current State ◽  
Home Based Primary Care ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Nurse Practitioner Autonomy and Complexity of Care in Rural Primary Care

2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872094591
Author(s):  
Hannah T. Neprash ◽  
Laura Barrie Smith ◽  
Bethany Sheridan ◽  
Ira Moscovice ◽  
Shailendra Prasad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Clinical Autonomy ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

The growing ranks of nurse practitioners (NPs) in rural areas of the United States have the potential to help alleviate existing primary care shortages. This study uses a nationwide source of claims- and EHR-data from 2017 to construct measures of NP clinical autonomy and complexity of care. Comparisons between rural and urban primary care practices reveal greater clinical autonomy for rural NPs, who were more likely to have an independent patient panel, to practice with less physician supervision, and to prescribe Schedule II controlled substances. In contrast, rural and urban NPs provided care of similar complexity. These findings provide the first claims- and EHR-based evidence for the commonly held perception that NPs practice more autonomously in rural areas than in urban areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document