Pitfalls in the Assessment of Brain-Machine Interfaces Using Information Transfer Rate
AbstractInformation transfer rate (ITR), measured in bits/s, can be applied to evaluate motor performance, including the capacity of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) to control external actuators. In a 2013 article entitled “Transfer of information by BMI” and published in Neuroscience, Tehovnik and his colleagues utilized ITR to assess the performance of several BMIs reported in the literature. We examined these analyses closely and found several fundamental flaws in their evaluation of ITR. Here we discuss the pitfalls in Tehovnik’s measurements of ITR, as well as several other issues raised in “Transfer of information by BMI”, including the claim that BMIs cannot be a reasonable option for paralyzed patients.HighlightsInformation transfer rate is discussed for BMI experiments, where subjects reach to targets.Task settings, not just the number of possible targets, are important to calculate information correctly.Active tactile exploration can be quantified as information transfer, but the number of targets is insufficient for such quantification.Information transfer rate increases with the number of neural recording channels.For practical applications, improvement in quality of life is essential, not information transfer rate per se.