scholarly journals Interdependence of balance mechanisms during bipedal locomotion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Fettrow ◽  
Hendrik Reimann ◽  
David Grenet ◽  
Elizabeth Thompson ◽  
Jeremy Crenshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Systematic Change ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Balance System ◽  
Bipedal Gait ◽  
Walking Balance

AbstractOur main interest is to identify how humans maintain upright while walking. Balance during standing and walking is different, primarily due to a gait cycle which the nervous system must contend with a variety of body configurations and frequent perturbations (i.e., heel-strike). We have identified three mechanisms that healthy young adults use to respond to a visually perceived fall to the side. The lateral ankle mechanism and the foot placement mechanism are used to shift the center of pressure in the direction of the perceived fall, and the center of mass away from the perceived fall. The push-off mechanism, a systematic change in ankle plan-tarflexion angle in the trailing leg, results in fine adjustments to medial-lateral balance near the end of double stance. The focus here is to understand how the three basic balance mechanisms are coordinated to produce an overall balance response. The results indicate that lateral ankle and foot placement mechanisms are inversely related. Larger lateral ankle responses lead to smaller foot placement changes. Correlations involving the push-off mechanism, while significant, were weak. However, the consistency of the correlations across stimulus conditions suggest the push-off mechanism has the role of small adjustments to medial-lateral movement near the end of the balance response. This verifies that a fundamental feature of human bipedal gait is a highly flexible balance system that recruits and coordinates multiple mechanisms to maintain upright balance during walking to accommodate extreme changes in body configuration and frequent perturbations.

scholarly journals The effect of anteroposterior perturbations on the control of the center of mass during treadmill walking

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud van den Bogaart ◽  
Sjoerd M. Bruijn ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën ◽  
Pieter Meyns
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Counter Rotation

AbstractShifts of the center of pressure (CoP) through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism) cause accelerations of the center of mass (CoM) that can be used to stabilize gait. An additional mechanism that can be used to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism, i.e., changing the angular momentum of segments around the CoM to change the direction of the ground reaction force. The relative contribution of these mechanisms to the control of the CoM is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relative contribution of these mechanisms to control the CoM in the anteroposterior (AP) direction during a normal step and the first recovery step after perturbation in healthy adults. Nineteen healthy subjects walked on a split-belt treadmill and received unexpected belt acceleration perturbations of various magnitudes applied immediately after right heel-strike. Full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained to calculate the contributions of the CoP-mechanism and the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM. We found that the CoP-mechanism contributed to corrections of the CoM acceleration after the AP perturbations, while the counter-rotation mechanism actually contributed to CoM acceleration in the direction of the perturbation, but only in the initial phases of the first step after the perturbation. The counter-rotation mechanism appeared to prevent interference with the gait pattern, rather than using it to control the CoM after the perturbation. Understanding the mechanisms used to stabilize gait may have implications for the design of therapeutic interventions that aim to decrease fall incidence.Summary statementUnderstanding the mechanisms used to stabilize gait during unperturbed and perturbed walking may have implications for the design of therapeutic interventions that aim to decrease fall incidence.

scholarly journals Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing?

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 1622-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro G. Morasso ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Muscle Stiffness ◽  
The Body ◽  
Ankle Muscles ◽  
Upright Standing ◽  
Stiffness Control ◽  
Control Patterns ◽  
Physiological Values

A stiffness control model for the stabilization of sway has been proposed recently. This paper discusses two inadequacies of the model: modeling and empiric consistency. First, we show that the in-phase relation between the trajectories of the center of pressure and the center of mass is determined by physics, not by control patterns. Second, we show that physiological values of stiffness of the ankle muscles are insufficient to stabilize the body “inverted pendulum.” The evidence of active mechanisms of sway stabilization is reviewed, pointing out the potentially crucial role of foot skin and muscle receptors.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242215
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

Step-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J.H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S.M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Stride Frequency ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractStep-by-step foot placement control, relative to the center of mass (CoM) kinematic state, is generally considered a dominant mechanism for maintenance of gait stability. By adequate (mediolateral) positioning of the center of pressure with respect to the CoM, the ground reaction force generates a moment that prevents falling. In healthy individuals, foot placement is complemented mainly by ankle moment control ensuring stability. To evaluate possible compensatory relationships between step-by-step foot placement and complementary ankle moments, we investigated the degree of (active) foot placement control during steady-state walking, and under either foot placement-, or ankle moment constraints. Thirty healthy participants walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and EMG activities were recorded. As a replication of earlier findings, we first showed step-by-step foot placement is associated with preceding CoM state and hip ab-/adductor activity during steady-state walking. Tight control of foot placement appears to be important at normal walking speed because there was a limited change in the degree of foot placement control despite the presence of a foot placement constraint. At slow speed, the degree of foot placement control decreased substantially, suggesting that tight control of foot placement is less essential when walking slowly. Step-by-step foot placement control was not tightened to compensate for constrained ankle moments. Instead compensation was achieved through increases in step width and stride frequency.

scholarly journals The effect of external lateral stabilization on the control of mediolateral stability in walking and running

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Mahaki ◽  
Sjoerd M Bruijn ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën
Keyword(s):  
Active Control ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Gait Cycle ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Step Width ◽  
Kinematic Data ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Consumption Data ◽  
Mediolateral Stability

It is still unclear how humans control mediolateral (ML) stability in walking and even more so for running. Here, foot placement adjustment as a main mechanism of active control of mediolateral stability was compared between walking and running. Moreover, to verify the role of foot placement as a means of active control of ML stability and associated metabolic costs in both modes of locomotion, this study investigated the effect of external lateral stabilization on foot placement control. Ten young adults participated in this study. Kinematic data of the trunk (T6) and feet (heels) as well as breath-by-breath oxygen consumption data were recorded during walking and running on a treadmill in normal and stabilized conditions. Coordination between ML trunk Center of Mass (CoM) state and subsequent ML foot placement, step width, and step width variability were assessed. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (either normal or SPM1d) were used to test for effects of walking vs. running and of normal vs. stabilized locomotion. We found a stronger association between ML trunk CoM state and foot placement in walking than in running from 90-100% of the gait cycle and also a higher step width variability in walking, but no significant differences in step width. The association between trunk CoM state and foot placement was significantly decreased by external lateral stabilization in walking and running, and this reduction was stronger in walking than in running from 75-100% of gait cycle. Surprisingly, energy cost significantly increased by external lateral stabilization, which was more pronounced in running than walking. We conclude that ML foot placement is coordinated to the CoM kinematic state to stabilize both walking and running. This coordination is more tight in walking than in running and appears not to contribute substantially to the energy costs of either mode of locomotion.

scholarly journals Greater exposure to repetitive subconcussive head impacts is associated with vestibular dysfunction and balance impairments during walking

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (23 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S27.2-S27
Author(s):  
Fernando Santos ◽  
Jaclyn B Caccese ◽  
Mariana Gongora ◽  
Ian Sotnek ◽  
Elizabeth Kaye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Balance Control ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Vestibular Dysfunction ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Head Impacts ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Balance Deficits ◽  
Soccer Heading

Exposure to repetitive subconcussive head impacts (RSHI), specifically soccer heading, is associated with white matter microstructural changes and cognitive performance impairments. However, the effect of soccer heading exposure on vestibular processing and balance control during walking has not been studied. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a tool that can be used to probe the vestibular system during standing and walking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of soccer heading with subclinical balance deficits during walking. Twenty adult amateur soccer players (10 males and 10 females, 22.3 ± 4.5 years, 170.5 ± 9.8 cm, 70.0 ± 10.5 kg) walked along a foam walkway with the eyes closed under 2 conditions: with GVS (∼40 trials) and without GVS (∼40 trials). Outcome measures included mediolateral center-of-mass (COM), center-of-pressure (COP) separation, foot placement, mediolateral ankle modulation, hip adduction, and ankle push off. For each balance mechanism, a GVS response was calculated (GVS, mean [without GVS]). In addition, participants completed a questionnaire, reporting soccer heading exposure over the past year. A linear regression model was used to determine if vestibular processing and balance during walking were related to RSHI exposure. Both foot placement (R2 = 0.324, p = 0.009) and hip adduction (R2 = 0.183, p = 0.50) were predicted by RSHI; whereby, greater exposure to RSHI was associated with greater foot placement and hip adduction responses. However, COM-COP separation (R2 < 0.001, p = 0.927), ankle modulation (R2 = 0.037, p = 0.417), and push off (R2 < 0.001, p = 0.968) were not related to RSHI exposure. Individuals who were exposed to greater RSHI were more perturbed by vestibular stimulation during walking, suggesting that there may be vestibular dysfunction and balance impairments with frequent heading; specifically, individuals with greater exposure to RSHI responded with larger foot placement and hip adduction responses to GVS.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles activate: mediolateral center of pressure control ensures stable gait

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anina Moira van Leeuwen ◽  
Jaap H van Dieen ◽  
Andreas Daffertshofer ◽  
Sjoerd M Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Ankle Muscle ◽  
Moment Control

During steady-state walking mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance. Too medial steps were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, too lateral steps were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are caught in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. H. van Dieën ◽  
A. Daffertshofer ◽  
S. M. Bruijn
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Stable Steady State ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Ankle Moment ◽  
Moment Control

AbstractDuring steady-state walking, mediolateral gait stability can be maintained by controlling the center of pressure (CoP). The CoP modulates the moment of the ground reaction force, which brakes and reverses movement of the center of mass (CoM) towards the lateral border of the base of support. In addition to foot placement, ankle moments serve to control the CoP. We hypothesized that, during steady-state walking, single stance ankle moments establish a CoP shift to correct for errors in foot placement. We expected ankle muscle activity to be associated with this complementary CoP shift. During treadmill walking, full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyography were recorded in thirty healthy participants. We found a negative relationship between preceding foot placement error and CoP displacement during single stance; steps that were too medial were compensated for by a lateral CoP shift and vice versa, steps that were too lateral were compensated for by a medial CoP shift. Peroneus longus, soleus and tibialis anterior activity correlated with these CoP shifts. As such, we identified an (active) ankle strategy during steady-state walking. As expected, absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error decreased when walking with shoes constraining ankle moments. Yet, contrary to our expectations that ankle moment control would compensate for constrained foot placement, the absolute explained CoP variance by foot placement error did not increase when foot placement was constrained. We argue that this lack of compensation reflects the interdependent nature of ankle moment and foot placement control. We suggest that single stance ankle moments do not only compensate for preceding foot placement errors, but also assist control of the subsequent foot placement. Foot placement and ankle moment control are ‘caught’ in a circular relationship, in which constraints imposed on one will also influence the other.

scholarly journals The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud van den Bogaart ◽  
Sjoerd M. Bruijn ◽  
Joke Spildooren ◽  
Jaap H. van Dieën ◽  
Pieter Meyns
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Task Constraints ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Counter Rotation ◽  
Body Kinematic

Stability during walking can be maintained by shifts of the Center of Pressure through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism). An additional mechanism to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism i.e. changing the angular momentum of segments around the Center of Mass (CoM) to change the direction of the ground reaction force. It is unknown if and how humans use the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM during walking and how this interacts with the CoP-mechanism. Thirteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained. The contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanisms to control the CoM were calculated during steady-state walking, walking on LesSchuh, i.e. constraining mediolateral CoP shifts underneath the stance foot and walking on LesSchuh at 50% of normal step width, constraining both foot placement and ankle mechanisms (LesSchuh50%). A decreased magnitude of within-stride control by the CoP-mechanism was compensated for by an increased magnitude of within-stride control by the counter-rotation mechanism during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. This suggests that the counter-rotation mechanism is used to stabilize gait when needed. However, the mean contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism over strides did not increase during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. The CoP-mechanism was the main contributor to the total CoM acceleration. The use of the counter-rotation mechanism may be limited because angular accelerations ultimately need to be reversed and because of interference with other task constraints, such as head stabilization and preventing interference with the gait pattern.

Exploring Baryon Rich Matter with Heavy-Ion Collisions

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 583 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Harabasz
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Heavy Ion ◽  
State Density ◽  
Heavy Nuclei ◽  
First Order ◽  
Center Of Mass Energy ◽  
Ion Collisions ◽  
Deconfinement Phase Transition ◽  
Ground State Density

Collisions of heavy nuclei at (ultra-)relativistic energies provide a fascinating opportunity to re-create various forms of matter in the laboratory. For a short extent of time (10-22 s), matter under extreme conditions of temperature and density can exist. In dedicated experiments, one explores the microscopic structure of strongly interacting matter and its phase diagram. In heavy-ion reactions at SIS18 collision energies, matter is substantially compressed (2–3 times ground-state density), while moderate temperatures are reached (T < 70 MeV). The conditions closely resemble those that prevail, e.g., in neutron star mergers. Matter under such conditions is currently being studied at the High Acceptance DiElecton Spectrometer (HADES). Important topics of the research program are the mechanisms of strangeness production, the emissivity of matter, and the role of baryonic resonances herein. In this contribution, we will focus on the important experimental results obtained by HADES in Au+Au collisions at 2.4 GeV center-of-mass energy. We will also present perspectives for future experiments with HADES and CBM at SIS100, where higher beam energies and intensities will allow for the studies of the first-order deconfinement phase transition and its critical endpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document