scholarly journals Guide RNA acrobatics: positioning consecutive uridines for pseudouridylation by H/ACA pseudouridylation loops with dual guide capacity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beáta E. Jády ◽  
Amandine Ketele ◽  
Dylan Moulis ◽  
Tamás Kiss

Site-specific pseudouridylation of human ribosomal and spliceosomal RNAs is directed by H/ACA guide RNAs composed of two hairpins carrying internal pseudouridylation guide loops. The distal “antisense” sequences of the pseudouridylation loop base-pair with the target RNA to position two unpaired target nucleotides 5′-UN-3′, including the 5′ substrate U, under the base of the distal stem topping the guide loop. Therefore, each pseudouridylation loop is expected to direct synthesis of a single pseudouridine (Ψ) in the target sequence. However, in this study, genetic depletion and restoration and RNA mutational analyses demonstrate that at least four human H/ACA RNAs (SNORA53, SNORA57, SCARNA8, and SCARNA1) carry pseudouridylation loops supporting efficient and specific synthesis of two consecutive pseudouridines (ΨΨ or ΨNΨ) in the 28S (Ψ3747/Ψ3749), 18S (Ψ1045/Ψ1046), and U2 (Ψ43/Ψ44 and Ψ89/Ψ91) RNAs, respectively. In order to position two substrate Us for pseudouridylation, the dual guide loops form alternative base-pairing interactions with their target RNAs. This remarkable structural flexibility of dual pseudouridylation loops provides an unexpected versatility for RNA-directed pseudouridylation without compromising its efficiency and accuracy. Besides supporting synthesis of at least 6% of human ribosomal and spliceosomal Ψs, evidence indicates that dual pseudouridylation loops also participate in pseudouridylation of yeast and archaeal rRNAs.

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 5797-5807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold M. Kiss ◽  
Beáta E. Jády ◽  
Edouard Bertrand ◽  
Tamás Kiss

ABSTRACT Pseudouridine, the most abundant modified nucleoside in RNA, is synthesized by posttranscriptional isomerization of uridines. In eukaryotic RNAs, site-specific synthesis of pseudouridines is directed primarily by box H/ACA guide RNAs. In this study, we have identified 61 novel putative pseudouridylation guide RNAs by construction and characterization of a cDNA library of human box H/ACA RNAs. The majority of the new box H/ACA RNAs are predicted to direct pseudouridine synthesis in rRNAs and spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs. We can attribute RNA-directed modification to 79 of the 97 pseudouridylation sites present in the human 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs and to 11 of the 21 pseudouridines reported for the U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 spliceosomal RNAs. We have also identified 12 novel box H/ACA RNAs which lack apparent target pseudouridines in rRNAs and small nuclear RNAs. These putative guide RNAs likely function in the pseudouridylation of some other types of cellular RNAs, suggesting that RNA-guided pseudouridylation is more general than assumed before. The genomic organization of the new box H/ACA RNA genes indicates that in human cells, all box H/ACA pseudouridylation guide RNAs are processed from introns of pre-mRNA transcripts which either encode a protein product or lack protein-coding capacity.


Author(s):  
Y.V. Mikhaylova ◽  
◽  
M.A. Tyumentseva ◽  
A.A. Shelenkov ◽  
Y.G. Yanushevich ◽  
...  

In this study, we assessed the efficiency and off-target activity of the CRISPR/CAS complex with one of the selected guide RNAs using the CIRCLE-seq technology. The gene encoding the human chemokine receptor CCR5 was used as a target sequence for genome editing. The results of this experiment indicate the correct choice of the guide RNA and efficient work of the CRISPR- CAS ribonucleoprotein complex used. CIRCLE-seq technology has shown high sensitivity compared to bioinformatic methods for predicting off-target activity of CRISPR/CAS complexes. We plan to evaluate the efficiency and off-target activity of CRISPR/CAS ribonucleoprotein complexes with other guide RNAs by slightly adjusting the CIRCLE-seq-technology protocol in order to reduce nonspecific DNA breaks and increase the number of reliable reads.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2933-2941 ◽  
Author(s):  
L N Rusché ◽  
K J Piller ◽  
B Sollner-Webb

RNA editing in kinetoplast mitochondrial transcripts involves the insertion and/or deletion of uridine residues and is directed by guide RNAs (gRNAs). It is thought to occur through a chimeric intermediate in which the 3' oligo(U) tail of the gRNA is covalently joined to the 3' portion of the mRNA at the site being edited. Chimeras have been proposed to be formed by a transesterification reaction but could also be formed by the known mitochondrial site-specific nuclease and RNA ligase. To distinguish between these models, we studied chimera formation in vitro directed by a trypanosome mitochondrial extract. This reaction was found to occur in two steps. First, the mRNA is cleaved in the 3' portion of the editing domain, and then the 3' fragment derived from this cleavage is ligated to the gRNA. The isolated mRNA 3' cleavage product is a more efficient substrate for chimera formation than is the intact mRNA, inconsistent with a transesterification mechanism but supporting a nuclease-ligase mechanism. Also, when normal mRNA cleavage is inhibited by the presence of a phosphorothioate, normal chimera formation no longer occurs. Rather, this phosphorothioate induces both cleavage and chimera formation at a novel site within the editing domain. Finally, levels of chimera-forming activity correlate with levels of mitochondrial RNA ligase activity when reactions are conducted under conditions which inhibit the ligase, including the lack of ATP containing a cleavable alpha-beta bond. These data show that chimera formation in the mitochondrial extract occurs by a nuclease-ligase mechanism rather than by transesterification.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10570
Author(s):  
Yuya Kato ◽  
Hirotaka Tabata ◽  
Kumiko Sato ◽  
Mariko Nakamura ◽  
Izumu Saito ◽  
...  

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronically infects more than 240 million people worldwide, causing chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 could provide new therapies because it can directly disrupt HBV genomes. However, because HBV genome sequences are highly diverse, the identical target sequence of guide RNA (gRNA), 20 nucleotides in length, is not necessarily present intact in the target HBV DNA in heterogeneous patients. Consequently, possible genome-editing drugs would be effective only for limited numbers of patients. Here, we show that an adenovirus vector (AdV) bearing eight multiplex gRNA expression units could be constructed in one step and amplified to a level sufficient for in vivo study with lack of deletion. Using this AdV, HBV X gene integrated in HepG2 cell chromosome derived from a heterogeneous patient was cleaved at multiple sites and disrupted. Indeed, four targets out of eight could not be cleaved due to sequence mismatches, but the remaining four targets were cleaved, producing irreversible deletions. Accordingly, the diverse X gene was disrupted at more than 90% efficiency. AdV containing eight multiplex gRNA units not only offers multiple knockouts of genes, but could also solve the problems of heterogeneous targets and escape mutants in genome-editing therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (19) ◽  
pp. 6509-6517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Mekler ◽  
Konstantin Kuznedelov ◽  
Konstantin Severinov

The CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases have been widely applied for genome editing in various organisms. Cas9 nucleases complexed with a guide RNA (Cas9–gRNA) find their targets by scanning and interrogating the genomic DNA for sequences complementary to the gRNA. Recognition of the DNA target sequence requires a short protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) located outside this sequence. Given that the efficiency of target location may depend on the strength of interactions that promote target recognition, here we sought to compare affinities of different Cas9 nucleases for their cognate PAM sequences. To this end, we measured affinities of Cas9 nucleases from Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Francisella novicida complexed with guide RNAs (gRNAs) (SpCas9–gRNA, SaCas9–gRNA, and FnCas9–gRNA, respectively) and of three engineered SpCas9–gRNA variants with altered PAM specificities for short, PAM-containing DNA probes. We used a “beacon” assay that measures the relative affinities of DNA probes by determining their ability to competitively affect the rate of Cas9–gRNA binding to fluorescently labeled target DNA derivatives called “Cas9 beacons.” We observed significant differences in the affinities for cognate PAM sequences among the studied Cas9 enzymes. The relative affinities of SpCas9–gRNA and its engineered variants for canonical and suboptimal PAMs correlated with previous findings on the efficiency of these PAM sequences in genome editing. These findings suggest that high affinity of a Cas9 nuclease for its cognate PAM promotes higher genome-editing efficiency.


1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5377-5385 ◽  
Author(s):  
B K Adler ◽  
S L Hajduk

RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria entails the posttranscriptional internal addition and occasional deletion of uridines from precursor mRNAs. Ample evidence exists to show that the information specifying the site and number of uridines added or deleted comes from small, mitochondrially encoded guide RNAs (gRNAs). More recent work indicates that the process involves an enzymatic cascade, initiating with an endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA at an editing site. The cleaved editing site can undergo uridine (U) addition to or deletion from the 3' end of the 5' fragment via a mitochondrial terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) or terminal uridylyl exonuclease, respectively. Mitochondrial RNA ligase subsequently rejoins the mRNA. Activities to carry out these processes have been found in trypanosome mitochondria, including an editing-site-specific endonuclease activity which cleaves preedited but not edited mRNAs. We have found that this enzymatic activity cosediments with the same 19S ribonucleoprotein particle previously shown to contain TUTase, RNA ligase, and gRNAs and remains stable after salt treatment. Depletion of endogenous cytochrome b gRNAs by the addition of complementary oligonucleotides in vitro completely inhibits editing-site cleavage of synthetic preedited cytochrome b mRNA. The addition of synthetic cognate gRNA for cytochrome b but not unrelated small RNA restores editing-site cleavage. These studies show that in addition to specifying the site and number of uridines added or deleted, gRNAs provide the necessary information for cleavage by the editing-site-specific endonuclease.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Silvana Konermann ◽  
Nicholas J. Brideau ◽  
Peter Lotfy ◽  
Scott J. Novick ◽  
...  

AbstractCRISPR-Cas endonucleases directed against foreign nucleic acids mediate prokaryotic adaptive immunity and have been tailored for broad genetic engineering applications. Type VI-D CRISPR systems contain the smallest known family of single effector Cas enzymes, and their signature Cas13d ribonuclease employs guide RNAs to cleave matching target RNAs. To understand the molecular basis for Cas13d function, we resolved cryo-electron microscopy structures of Cas13d-guide RNA binary complex and Cas13d-guide-target RNA ternary complex to 3.4 and 3.3 Å resolution, respectively. Furthermore, a 6.5 Å reconstruction of apo Cas13d combined with hydrogen-deuterium exchange revealed conformational dynamics that have implications for RNA scanning. These structures, together with biochemical and cellular characterization, explain the compact molecular architecture of Cas13d and provide insights into the structural transitions required for enzyme activation. Our comprehensive analysis of Cas13d in diverse enzymatic states facilitated site-specific truncations for minimal size and delineates a blueprint for improving biomolecular applications of RNA targeting.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Deryusheva ◽  
Gaelle JS Talross ◽  
Joseph G. Gall

In eukaryotes, rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs are heavily modified posttranscriptionally. Pseudouridylation and 2′-O-methylation are the most abundant types of RNA modifications. They are mediated by modification guide RNAs, also known as small nucleolar (sno)RNAs and small Cajal body-specific (sca)RNAs. We used yeast and vertebrate cells to test guide activities predicted for a number of snoRNAs, based on their regions of complementarity with rRNAs. We showed that human SNORA24 is a genuine guide RNA for 18S-ψ609, despite some non-canonical base-pairing with its target. At the same time, we found quite a few snoRNAs that have the ability to base-pair with rRNAs and can induce predicted modifications in artificial substrate RNAs, but do not modify the same target sequence within endogenous rRNA molecules. Furthermore, certain fragments of rRNAs can be modified by the endogenous yeast modification machinery when inserted into an artificial backbone RNA, even though the same sequences are not modified in endogenous yeast rRNAs. In Xenopus cells a guide RNA generated from scaRNA, but not from snoRNA, could induce an additional pseudouridylation of U2 snRNA at position 60; both guide RNAs were equally active on a U2 snRNA-specific substrate in yeast cells. Thus, posttranscriptional modification of functionally important RNAs, such as rRNAs and snRNAs, is highly regulated and more complex than simply strong base-pairing between a guide RNA and substrate RNA. We discuss possible regulatory roles for these unexpected modifications.


Biomolecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Deryusheva ◽  
Joseph G. Gall

Site-specific 2’-O-ribose methylation is an abundant post-transcriptional modification mediated by small non-coding nuclear RNAs known as box C/D modification guide RNAs. The minimal structural requirements for these guide RNAs to function in higher eukaryotes are still unclear. To address this question, we generated a series of mutant variants of Drosophila box C/D scaRNA:MeU2-C28 and tested their modification guide activities in the Xenopus oocyte system. Our data suggest that box C/D guide RNA function requires either a terminal or an internal consensus kink-turn structure. We identified the minimal functional box C/D guide RNA. It consists of a single-domain molecule with (i) a terminal stem with a consensus kink-turn domain, (ii) one box C and box D connected by a 14-nucleotide antisense element and (iii) a one-nucleotide spacer between the box C and the antisense element. In this single domain RNA, the sequence of the spacer is more important than its length. We suggest that the secondary structure of box C/D RNAs, essential for guide RNA function, is more complex than generally supposed. At the same time, the expression of functional extremely short single-domain box C/D RNAs is possible in higher eukaryotes.


RNA ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. rna.078916.121
Author(s):  
Svetlana Deryusheva ◽  
Gaelle JS Talross ◽  
Joseph G. Gall

In eukaryotes, rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs are heavily modified posttranscriptionally. Pseudouridylation and 2’-O-methylation are the most abundant types of RNA modifications. They are mediated by modification guide RNAs, also known as small nucleolar (sno)RNAs and small Cajal body-specific (sca)RNAs. We used yeast and vertebrate cells to test guide activities predicted for a number of snoRNAs, based on their regions of complementarity with rRNAs. We showed that human SNORA24 is a genuine guide RNA for 18S-ψ609, despite some non-canonical base-pairing with its target. At the same time, we found quite a few snoRNAs that have the ability to base-pair with rRNAs and can induce predicted modifications in artificial substrate RNAs, but do not modify the same target sequence within endogenous rRNA molecules. Furthermore, certain fragments of rRNAs can be modified by the endogenous yeast modification machinery when inserted into an artificial backbone RNA, even though the same sequences are not modified in endogenous yeast rRNAs. In Xenopus cells a guide RNA generated from scaRNA, but not from snoRNA, could induce an additional pseudouridylation of U2 snRNA at position 60; both guide RNAs were equally active on a U2 snRNA-specific substrate in yeast cells. Thus, posttranscriptional modification of functionally important RNAs, such as rRNAs and snRNAs, is highly regulated and more complex than simply strong base-pairing between a guide RNA and substrate RNA. We discuss possible regulatory roles for these unexpected modifications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document