Surface Space-Charge Layers in Barium Titanate

1956 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Chynoweth
Keyword(s):  
1962 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1161-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Branwood ◽  
O H Hughes ◽  
J D Hurd ◽  
R H Tredgold

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 12587-12597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kessel ◽  
Roger A. De Souza ◽  
Manfred Martin

Oxygen isotope experiments reveal a surface space-charge layer and a migration enthalpy of oxygen vacancies of 0.7 eV.


1976 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. K131-K134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Zabara ◽  
A. Yu. Kudzin ◽  
K. A. Kolesnichenko

1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 953-956
Author(s):  
L. Yu. Kudzin ◽  
K. A. Kolesnichenko ◽  
Yu. V. Zabara

Author(s):  
Vinayak P. Dravid ◽  
V. Ravikumar ◽  
Richard Plass

With the advent of coherent electron sources with cold field emission guns (cFEGs), it has become possible to utilize the coherent interference phenomenon and perform “practical” electron holography. Historically, holography was envisioned to extent the resolution limit by compensating coherent aberrations. Indeed such work has been done with reasonable success in a few laboratories around the world. However, it is the ability of electron holography to map electrical and magnetic fields which has caught considerable attention of materials science community.There has been considerable theoretical work on formation of space charge on surfaces and internal interfaces. In particular, formation and nature of space charge have important implications for the performance of numerous electroceramics which derive their useful properties from electrically active grain boundaries. Bonnell and coworkers, in their elegant STM experiments provided the direct evidence for GB space charge and its sign, while Chiang et al. used the indirect but powerful technique of x-ray microchemical profiling across GBs to infer the nature of space charge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document