scholarly journals Quantum phase transition in the spherical mean-field plus quadrupole-quadrupole and pairing model in a single-jshell

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Feng Pan ◽  
J. P. Draayer
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 2050039
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Feng Pan ◽  
Xiao-Xue Ding ◽  
J. P. Draayer

The shape phase crossover in the mean-field plus the geometric quadrupole–quadrupole and pairing model within two [Formula: see text]-orbits is analyzed, for which a simple description of [Formula: see text]Sn confined in the lowest [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] orbits above the [Formula: see text]Sn core is demonstrated to reveal the crossover behavior of the model. It is shown that [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] in this case may serve as effective order parameters for even–even and odd-A systems, respectively, from which the shape phase crossover from the rotation-like phase to the superconducting-like phase can be observed with variation of the number of valence neutrons.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Maximilian Nitsch ◽  
Benjamin Geiger ◽  
Klaus Richter ◽  
Juan-Diego Urbina

We identify a (pseudo) relativistic spin-dependent analogue of the celebrated quantum phase transition driven by the formation of a bright soliton in attractive one-dimensional bosonic gases. In this new scenario, due to the simultaneous existence of the linear dispersion and the bosonic nature of the system, special care must be taken with the choice of energy region where the transition takes place. Still, due to a crucial adiabatic separation of scales, and identified through extensive numerical diagonalization, a suitable effective model describing the transition is found. The corresponding mean-field analysis based on this effective model provides accurate predictions for the location of the quantum phase transition when compared against extensive numerical simulations. Furthermore, we numerically investigate the dynamical exponents characterizing the approach from its finite-size precursors to the sharp quantum phase transition in the thermodynamic limit.


2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ádám Bácsi ◽  
Attila Virosztek ◽  
László Borda ◽  
Balázs Dóra

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 05005
Author(s):  
José-Enrique García-Ramos ◽  
Kris Heyde

The goal of this contribution is to analyze the connection between shape coexistence and quantum phase transition, two seemingly unrelated phenomena that share common aspects, namely, the rapid change in the ground state structure along an isotope chain or the presence of several minima at the mean-field level. To illustrate the similarities and differences between both phenomena, we will focus in the Pb region, in particular in Pt and Hg isotopes, as well as in Zr isotopes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (34) ◽  
pp. 9475-9479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thai M. Hoang ◽  
Hebbe M. Bharath ◽  
Matthew J. Boguslawski ◽  
Martin Anquez ◽  
Bryce A. Robbins ◽  
...  

Spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs in a physical system whenever the ground state does not share the symmetry of the underlying theory, e.g., the Hamiltonian. This mechanism gives rise to massless Nambu–Goldstone modes and massive Anderson–Higgs modes. These modes provide a fundamental understanding of matter in the Universe and appear as collective phase or amplitude excitations of an order parameter in a many-body system. The amplitude excitation plays a crucial role in determining the critical exponents governing universal nonequilibrium dynamics in the Kibble–Zurek mechanism (KZM). Here, we characterize the amplitude excitations in a spin-1 condensate and measure the energy gap for different phases of the quantum phase transition. At the quantum critical point of the transition, finite-size effects lead to a nonzero gap. Our measurements are consistent with this prediction, and furthermore, we demonstrate an adiabatic quench through the phase transition, which is forbidden at the mean field level. This work paves the way toward generating entanglement through an adiabatic phase transition.


2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeri N. Kotov ◽  
D. X. Yao ◽  
A. H. Castro Neto ◽  
D. K. Campbell

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingtao Fan ◽  
Yuanwei Zhang ◽  
Lirong Wang ◽  
Feng Mei ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document