scholarly journals Ubiquitous Power Law Scaling in Nonlinear Self-Excited Hawkes Processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 127 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Kanazawa ◽  
Didier Sornette
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Bacry ◽  
Adrian Iuga ◽  
Matthieu Lasnier ◽  
Charles-Albert Lehalle

This study is the first to decipher market impact at all time scales on the same database, from a trade-by-trade scale to a daily one. Moreover, the very concentrated nature of the database (400,000 metaorders issued by investors, electronically traded, during one year—2010—, on European market all regulated by the same directive—MiFID—) ensures investors did not change their habits during the study. At the intraday scale, we confirm a square root temporary impact in the daily participation, and we shed light on a duration factor in [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. Including this factor in the fits reinforces the square root shape of impact. We observe a power-law for the transient impact with an exponent between [Formula: see text] (for long metaorders) and [Formula: see text] (for shorter ones). Moreover, we show that the market does not anticipate the size of the metaorders. The intraday decay seems to exhibit two regimes (though hard to identify precisely): a “slow” regime right after the execution of the metaorder followed by a faster one. At the daily time scale, we show price moves after a metaorder can be split between realizations of expected returns that have triggered the investing decision and an idiosynchratic impact that slowly decays to zero. Moreover, we propose a class of toy models based on Hawkes processes (the Hawkes Impact Model, HIM) to illustrate our reasoning. We show how the Impulsive-HIM model, despite its simplicity, embeds appealing features like transience and decay of impact. The latter is parametrized by a parameter C having a macroscopic interpretation: the ratio of contrarian reaction (i.e., impact decay) and of the “herding” reaction (i.e., impact amplification).


1999 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Donnison ◽  
L.I. Pettit

AbstractA Pareto distribution was used to model the magnitude data for short-period comets up to 1988. It was found using exponential probability plots that the brightness did not vary with period and that the cut-off point previously adopted can be supported statistically. Examination of the diameters of Trans-Neptunian bodies showed that a power law does not adequately fit the limited data available.


1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Gill ◽  
Charles I. Berlin

The unconditioned GSR’s elicited by tones of 60, 70, 80, and 90 dB SPL were largest in the mouse in the ranges around 10,000 Hz. The growth of response magnitude with intensity followed a power law (10 .17 to 10 .22 , depending upon frequency) and suggested that the unconditioned GSR magnitude assessed overall subjective magnitude of tones to the mouse in an orderly fashion. It is suggested that hearing sensitivity as assessed by these means may be closely related to the spectral content of the mouse’s vocalization as well as to the number of critically sensitive single units in the mouse’s VIIIth nerve.


2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Hagemeister

Abstract. When concentration tests are completed repeatedly, reaction time and error rate decrease considerably, but the underlying ability does not improve. In order to overcome this validity problem this study aimed to test if the practice effect between tests and within tests can be useful in determining whether persons have already completed this test. The power law of practice postulates that practice effects are greater in unpracticed than in practiced persons. Two experiments were carried out in which the participants completed the same tests at the beginning and at the end of two test sessions set about 3 days apart. In both experiments, the logistic regression could indeed classify persons according to previous practice through the practice effect between the tests at the beginning and at the end of the session, and, less well but still significantly, through the practice effect within the first test of the session. Further analyses showed that the practice effects correlated more highly with the initial performance than was to be expected for mathematical reasons; typically persons with long reaction times have larger practice effects. Thus, small practice effects alone do not allow one to conclude that a person has worked on the test before.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Ramirez ◽  
Sonia Perez ◽  
John G. Holden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document