scholarly journals Structure and function of the DNA repair enzyme 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II

1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (a1) ◽  
pp. C153-C154
Author(s):  
Y. Yamagata ◽  
M. Kato ◽  
Y. Tokuno ◽  
Y. Nakashima ◽  
K. Yasumura ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 726 (1 DNA Damage) ◽  
pp. 223-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHE-FU KUO ◽  
CLIFFORD D. MOL ◽  
MARIA M. THAYER ◽  
RICHARD P. CUNNINGHAM ◽  
JOHN A. TAINERC

Nature ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 374 (6520) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford D. Mol ◽  
Che-Fu Kuo ◽  
Maria M. Thayer ◽  
Richard P. Cunningham ◽  
John A. Tainer

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 5536-5540
Author(s):  
R J Boorstein ◽  
L N Chiu ◽  
G W Teebor

We isolated a mutant mammalian cell line lacking activity for the DNA repair enzyme 5-hydroxymethyluracil-DNA glycosylase (HmUra-DNA glycosylase). The mutant was isolated through its resistance to the thymidine analog 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (HmdUrd). The mutant incorporates HmdUrd into DNA to the same extent as the parent line but, lacking the repair enzyme, does not remove it. The phenotype of the mutant demonstrates that the toxicity of HmdUrd does not result from substitution of thymine in DNA by HmUra but rather from the removal via base excision of large numbers of HmUra residues in DNA. This finding elucidates a novel mechanism of toxicity for a xenobiotic nucleoside. Furthermore, the isolation of this line supports our hypothesis that the enzymatic repairability of HmUra derives not from its formation opposite adenine via the oxidation of thymine, but rather from its formation opposite guanine as a product of the oxidation and subsequent deamination of 5-methylcytosine.


DNA Repair ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siv A. Hegre ◽  
Pål Sætrom ◽  
Per A. Aas ◽  
Henrik S. Pettersen ◽  
Marit Otterlei ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (16) ◽  
pp. 10776-10785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Chen Chen ◽  
Chia-Lung Li ◽  
Yu-Yuan Hsiao ◽  
Yulander Duh ◽  
Hanna S. Yuan

1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3121-3125 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.C. Olsen ◽  
R. Aasland ◽  
C.U. Wittwer ◽  
H.E. Krokan ◽  
D.E. Helland

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0237682
Author(s):  
Luis Bermúdez-Guzmán ◽  
Gabriel Jimenez-Huezo ◽  
Andrés Arguedas ◽  
Alejandro Leal

The molecular function of a protein relies on its structure. Understanding how variants alter structure and function in multidomain proteins is key to elucidate the generation of a pathological phenotype. However, one may fall into the logical bias of assessing protein damage only based on the variants that are visible (survivorship bias), which can lead to partial conclusions. This is the case of PNKP, an important nuclear and mitochondrial DNA repair enzyme with both kinase and phosphatase function. Most variants in PNKP are confined to the kinase domain, leading to a pathological spectrum of three apparently distinct clinical entities. Since proteins and domains may have a different tolerability to variation, we evaluated whether variants in PNKP are under survivorship bias. Here, we provide the evidence that supports a higher tolerance in the kinase domain even when all variants reported are deleterious. Instead, the phosphatase domain is less tolerant due to its lower variant rates, a higher degree of sequence conservation, lower dN/dS ratios, and the presence of more disease-propensity hotspots. Together, our results support previous experimental evidence that demonstrated that the phosphatase domain is functionally more necessary and relevant for DNA repair, especially in the context of the development of the central nervous system. Finally, we propose the term "Wald’s domain" for future studies analyzing the possible survivorship bias in multidomain proteins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document