scholarly journals A rapid evidence assessment of psychological treatment approaches for stalking behaviour

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shonagh Leigh ◽  
Jason Davies
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Treatment Approaches ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
The Uk

Purpose This paper aims to provide practitioners with a brief but comprehensive review of the current evidence base for psychological treatment approaches used in the UK that may be useful for stalking therapies. Design/methodology/approach A rapid evidence assessment was conducted on papers (post the UK Protection from Harassment Act, 1997) that discuss treatments of stalking (with or without a conviction) and associated offences/disorders. Therapies reviewed were Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Cognitive Analytic Therapy, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy and Schema Therapy. Searches for Mentalization-Based Therapy and Psychodynamic Therapy in relation to stalking were also performed but yielded no results that met inclusion criteria. Findings There is currently a severely limited evidence base for the efficacy of the psychological treatment of stalking behaviours. Some interventions show promise although a multifaceted, formulation-based approach is likely to be required. Practical implications Future research would benefit from robust studies focused on stalking with long-term efficacy follow-ups. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first rapid evidence review of psychological treatments that directly address stalking behaviour.

Suicide prevention across the UK criminal justice system: an overview of current provision and future directions

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Stefanie Oliveira Antunes ◽  
Verity Wainwright ◽  
Neil Gredecki
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Current Provision

Purpose This paper aims to provide an overview of current suicide prevention across the UK criminal justice system (CJS). It considers shortcomings in current provision and how improvements could be made by drawing on international practice. Recommendations for practice going forward and suggestions for future research are made based on the literature. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides an overview of suicide prevention research to date. Relevant literature was identified through a basic journal article search, including terms such as “probation”, “criminal justice system”, “suicide”, “suicide prevention”, “UK” and “suicide theory”. Findings This paper highlights opportunities to improve practice based on the current evidence base, making several recommendations and suggestions for practice, including improving multi-agency cooperation through clearer distribution of responsibilities, simplifying data sharing and investing in trauma-focussed suicide training for staff. Practical implications This paper considers how research and psychological theory has informed suicide prevention practice in the UK. Limitations and challenges in applying theory to practice are explored, in the context of research with frontline staff who use such policies. This review proposes potential improvements to suicide prevention implementation to reduce suicide across the wider CJS. Originality/value This article represents an overview of the existing literature as well as possible future ideas for policy. It is therefore a piece that represents the viewpoint of all involved authors.

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis: Current Evidence and Future Directions

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Steel
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Interventions

AbstractThe past decade has seen considerable growth in the evidence base of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. Consistent reports of moderate effect sizes have led to such interventions being recommended as part of routine clinical practice. Most of this evidence is based on a generic form of CBT for psychosis applied to a heterogeneous group. An increase in the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions may require new protocols. Such therapeutic developments should be based on the theoretical understanding of the psychological processes associated with specific forms of psychotic presentation. The current evidence base of CBT for psychosis is reviewed, and barriers that have held back the development of this research are discussed.

scholarly journals Group cognitive–behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme Whitfield
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Psychological Therapies ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Group Cbt

SummaryCognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is a psychological treatment approach that can be delivered not only on a one-to-one basis but also to groups and in self-help formats. However, the evidence base supporting individual CBT is more extensive than the research regarding group CBT. This is likely to influence the choice of services that develop in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in primary care in England. This article outlines the different forms that group CBT takes, the way in which it may benefit people and the current evidence base supporting its use for anxiety and depression. It also outlines the advantages of group or individual CBT and describes those patients who appear to be best suited to a specific delivery.

Dementia friendly initiatives: A state of the science review

Dementia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1858-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A Hebert ◽  
Kezia Scales
Keyword(s):  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
State Of The Science

Background Dementia friendly initiatives share similarities with the age-friendly movement in a focus on active engagement and creating a good quality of life for older adults. Dementia friendly initiatives offer a welcoming optimistic narrative in dementia studies by embracing dignity, empowerment, and autonomy to enable well-being throughout the dementia trajectory. Purpose The purpose of this review is to explore the current science of dementia friendly initiatives, identify gaps, and inform future research. Method Quantitative, qualitative, and conceptual/theoretical peer-reviewed dementia friendly research literature were evaluated for their current evidence base and theoretical underpinnings. Results The dementia friendly initiatives research base is primarily qualitative and descriptive focused on environmental design, dementia awareness and education, and the development of dementia friendly communities. Person-centered care principles appear in dementia friendly initiatives centered in care settings. Strong interdisciplinary collaboration is present. Research is needed to determine the effect of dementia friendly initiatives on stakeholder-driven and community-based outcomes. Due to the contextual nature of dementia, the perspective of persons with dementia should be included as dementia friendly initiatives are implemented. Theory-based studies are needed to confirm dementia friendly initiative components and support rigorous evaluation. Dementia friendly initiatives broaden the lens from which dementia is viewed.

Cognitive behavioural therapy

2020 ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
Ken Laidlaw ◽  
Philip Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Problem Solving Therapy ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Dementia Caregiver

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is a dominant psychological treatment in the management of a range of psychiatric disorders and is increasingly being refined to suit the needs of older adults. This chapter summarizes the theory and practice of CBT, and emphasizes assessment, formulation, and adaptation of treatment with older patients. It describes in detail management of depressive disorder, anxiety disorders and dementia caregiver distress and includes relevant case examples. It also covers problem-solving therapy and behavioural activation. The chapter also describes mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), which has potential benefits in the treatment of older adults, and it reviews applications with older people. It outlines newer applications, including treatment of psychological symptoms associated with physical illness, psychosis, and memory impairment. Finally, it describes how the evidence base for CBT-based interventions with older adults is limited and reviews the extent of the current evidence.

Current and emerging psychological models

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Garrett
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Attachment Theory ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Diabetes Control ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Perspective Drawing ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Current Psychological

This chapter critiques the current psychological and social interventions used in addressing type 2 diabetes control and depression, suggesting an alternative approach using a lifespan perspective, drawing on attachment theory and personality research. It evaluates the psychological and social interactions of the two conditions and describes how current interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy approach these difficulties and the limitations suggested in the current evidence base. It goes on to discuss the association of attachment theory and personality traits on both type 2 diabetes control and depression and proposes how this evidence might be harnessed in future interventions to improve outcomes in both conditions.

Can analytical psychology be applied to the therapeutic community?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 101-111
Author(s):  
Andrew John Howe
Keyword(s):  
Group Psychotherapy ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Therapeutic Community ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Analytical Psychology ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Modern Work

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the theoretical potential of applying Jungian/analytical psychology concepts to a contemporary therapeutic community (TC) within the national health service. Design/methodology/approach A literature review concerning a Jungian understanding of group psychotherapy and TCs was undertaken. A summary and discussion of a detailed written account of a previous Jungian TC was then conducted. A comparison between a modern-day TC and Jungian approaches was then conducted with an ending discussion on the feasibility of incorporating Jungian ideas into modern work. Findings While Jung is thought to have a wholly negative view of groups and group psychotherapy, this was not found in the case. Furthermore, post-Jungian authors have attempted to use ideas from analytical psychology in their group work. While there are some aspects that could be implemented with relative ease in the modern TC, a complete shift into this different way of working would be a challenge and its current evidence base would not support this. Originality/value To the best of author’s knowledge, there are no other academic papers that have considered this subject.

An update on the growing evidence base for peer support

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chyrell Bellamy ◽  
Timothy Schmutte ◽  
Larry Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Peer Support Services

Purpose As peer support services have become increasingly used in mental health settings as a recovery-oriented practice, so has the body of published research on this approach to care. The purpose of this paper is to provide an update on the current evidence base for peer support for adults with mental illness in two domains: mental health and recovery, and physical health and wellness. Design/methodology/approach To provide a robust, non-redundant, and up-to-date review, first the authors searched for meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Second, the authors found individual studies not included in any of the reviews. Findings Peer services are generally equally effective to services provided by non-peer paraprofessionals on traditional clinical outcomes. Although some studies found peer services to be effective at reducing hospitalization rates and symptom severity, as a whole, the current evidence base is confounded by heterogeneity in programmatic characteristics and methodological shortcomings. On the other hand, the evidence is stronger for peer support services having more of a positive impact on levels of hope, empowerment, and quality of life. Research limitations/implications In addition to the need for further high-quality research on peer support in mental and physical health domains, the authors also question whether measures of hope, empowerment, and integration into the community are more relevant to recovery than traditional clinical outcomes. Originality/value This paper provides an original, robust, and up-to-date review of the evidence for peer services.

scholarly journals Epistaxis 2016: national audit of management

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
pp. 1131-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Presentation Rate ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Event Analysis ◽  
National Audit ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Consensus Guidance ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Audit Standards

AbstractBackground:Epistaxis is a common condition that can be associated with significant morbidity, and it places a considerable burden on our healthcare system. This national audit of management sought to assess current practice against newly created consensus recommendations and to expand our current evidence base.Methods:The management of epistaxis patients who met the inclusion criteria, at 113 registered sites across the UK, was compared with audit standards during a 30-day window. Data were further utilised for explorative analysis.Results:Data for 1826 cases were uploaded to the database, representing 94 per cent of all cases that met the inclusion criteria at participating sites. Sixty-two per cent of patients were successfully treated by ENT clinicians within 24 hours. The 30-day recurrent presentation rate across the dataset was 13.9 per cent. Significant event analysis revealed an all-cause 30-day mortality rate of 3.4 per cent.Conclusion:Audit findings demonstrate a varying alignment with consensus guidance, with explorative analysis countering some previously well-established tenets of management.

“Take home” naloxone: what does the evidence base tell us?

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefien J. F. Breedvelt ◽  
Derek K. Tracy ◽  
Emily C. Dickenson ◽  
Lucy V. Dean
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Base ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Practical Concern ◽  
Drug Overdoses ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
The Uk

Purpose – Opiod users are at high risk of suffering from drug overdoses. Naloxone has been used for decades in emergency treatment settings to reverse the symptoms of opioid overdose. Pilot studies and regional programmes have been rolled out to make naloxone more widely available. This review of user/carer administration of naloxone – so-called “take home naloxone” – aims to provide health professionals and interested readers with an up-to-date evidence base, clinical implications and practical concern considerations for such community management. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A review and analysis of the recent literature on naloxone. Findings – The evidence base suggests training and education is effective in preparing users for wider naloxone distribution. Furthermore, studies of varying quality indicate that naloxone may prove useful in reducing overdose-related deaths. However, even after implementation ineffective response techniques continued to be used at times and there remained a heistance to call medical services post overdose. Intranasal naloxone may reduce some of the risks associated with intramuscular naloxone. Ethical considerations, including provision of a needle and syringe kit to the community, should be considered. Studies suffered from a lack of follow-up data and methodological difficulties are associated with establishing opioid-related deaths post implementation. Two running trials in the UK might mitigate these concerns. Research limitations/implications – Future research is needed to address wider context of an overdose and targeting associated risk factors. Originality/value – Clinicians and other professionals will be informed on the most up-to-date evidence base and which areas are improtant to consider when take-home naloxone is introduced in their services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document