Linking the Human Element to the Risk Management Process: One of the Internal Control Processes in Governance of an Organisation

Author(s):  
Sharon Seychell
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-132
Author(s):  
Jarosław Rokicki

Risk management is an integral part of the management control processes, which is primarily the responsibility of the Manager of local government units. Conscious and structured risk management allows the manager to limit events that may have a negative impact on the implementation of tasks. This is why it is so important to organize a risk management process that ensures the achievement of objectives and tasks. The theoretical settlement made in part one of the article allowed the author, on the basis of internal regulations in the selected Dąbrowa Górnicza commune, to synthetically describe the risk management process and to present the measures and indicators that illustrate the process. Against this background, a formalized risk management process in a commune where a lot of space has been devoted to the risk management process adopted is shown. The responsibilities of the individual employees of the organizations involved in the risk management process have been clearly identified.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
IKA PERMATASARI

Sound liquidity risk management is needed to deal with the impact of liquidity risk that can bring contagion effects that threatens the financial system stability of a country. This study aims to analyze the necessary issues in liquidity risk management in Indonesia, which emphasized on four pillars. The main pillars of the bank's liquidity risk management include active oversight board of commissioners and directors; policies, procedures, and liquidity risk limits; liquidity risk management process; and internal control systems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Firmenich

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to emphasise on the need for efficient and effective project risk management practices and to support project managers in increasing the cost certainty of projects by proposing a new framework for project risk management. Design/methodology/approach The author adopts a “constructivist” methodology, drawing on practices common in construction management sciences and new institutional economics. Findings The author presents a holistic and customisable project risk management framework that is grounded in both practice and academia. The framework is holistic because, amongst others, all steps of the typical risk management process are addressed. The framework is customisable, because it allows for alternative ways of implementing the project risk management steps depending on the project-specific circumstances. Research limitations/implications The framework does not address the potential unwillingness of the project players to set up a project risk management process, at all. The proposed framework has not yet been tested empirically. Future research will seek to validate the framework. Originality/value The framework is designed to account for the difficult circumstances of a complex construction project. It is intended to support decision makers in customising a practical yet comprehensive project risk management concept to the characteristics of the unique project. Although many other project risk management concepts are designed based on the assumption that actors are perfectly rational and informed, this framework’s design is based on the opposite assumption. The framework is dynamic and should adapt over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document