Commentary Paper on “Learning and Classification of Trajectories in Dynamic Scenes: A General Framework for Live Video Analysis”

Author(s):  
François Brémond ◽  
Guido Pusiol
Author(s):  
C Angela M Gomez ◽  
L Luisa F Trejos ◽  
A Estefany Osorio ◽  
S Andres F Calvo ◽  
L Mauricio Holguin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Bjork ◽  
Anton Nilsson ◽  
Carl Bonander ◽  
Ulf Strömberg

Abstract Background: Non-participation, losses to follow up and other types of study-specific selection mechanisms can be serious concerns in epidemiological studies. There are also selection processes that result in non-random groupings and changes in the composition of populations. These are continuously on-going irrespectively of whether they are subject to sampling in empirical studies. Such population selections are often overlooked, but may lead to lack of comparability of exposed and unexposed populations or decrease study validity in other ways. The overall aim of this study was to develop a simple but general framework for classifying various types of selection mechanisms of relevance for epidemiological research. Methods: We classify selection mechanisms in three dimensions: i) selection at the population level vs. selection that is study-specific, ii) type of mechanism (selection causing exposure vs. selection in population at risk), iii) timing of the selection (pre-exposure, during exposure or post-outcome). Results: Examples from the epidemiological literature of selection mechanisms are discussed and classified according to the three dimensions of the proposed framework. Conclusions: Increased mechanistic understanding of when, how, and why confusion of effects can occur because of selection is an important step towards improved validity of epidemiological research.


Lituanistica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darius Daukšas

The early years of the independence of the Lithuanian state in the last decade of the twentieth century witnessed the construction of the nationhood through the evolving definition of “we” and “the other” in the nation. The Lithuanian diaspora took an active part in the discussions of defining one’s belonging to a nation. The core element in the discussion was the Law on Citizenship of the Republic Lithuania of 1991, which could be seen as a tool for classification of the population in defining an individual’s belonging to the nation. In this law, gradual clarification of the notion of the Lithuanian descent could be seen as inclusion of the diaspora in the category of ‘we’ in the general framework of the nationhood. The analysis of media articles of that period gives a vivid picture of the process of the construction of national belonging and reveals quite innovative interpretations of belonging proposed by the diaspora. Lithuanian émigrés questioned the established assumption in nationalist thinking that regarded the territory as the main precondition for belonging to a nation; instead, they suggested definitions of belonging based on common self-awareness, language, and the like, but their main criterion was the Lithuanian descent.


Author(s):  
Yohei Mukai ◽  
Kento Morita ◽  
Nobu C. Shirai ◽  
Tetsushi Wakabayashi ◽  
Harumi Shinkoda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document