Toward Point-of-Care Assessment of Platelet Count-induced Changes in Whole Blood Coagulation with a Dielectric Microsensor

Author(s):  
Debnath Maji ◽  
Uiial Didar Singh Sekhon ◽  
Anirban Sen Gupta ◽  
Michael A. Suster ◽  
Pedram Mohseni
Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3754-3754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi X. Stavrou ◽  
Michael A. Suster ◽  
Debnath Maji ◽  
Erdem Kucukal ◽  
Ujjal Didar Singh Sekhon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Early identification of coagulopathy has crucial clinical implications for the management of patients who are critically ill, severely injured or who are on anticoagulation therapy. Conventional laboratory-based coagulation tests are time-consuming, labor-intensive and costly. Currently available point-of-care (POC) devices are intended for use in specific patient populations (warfarin) or measurements are insensitive due to interference from the device surface. There is a growing need for a low-cost, easy-to-use, portable platform for POC assessment of the complete hemostatic process outside of the laboratory setting. Methods & Results: We have developed a novel dielectric microsensor, termed ClotChip, that is based on the fully electrical technique of dielectric spectroscopy (DS) and is sensitive to multiple coagulation factors and platelet activity, thereby allowing comprehensive blood coagulation assessment in a miniaturized, portable measurement platform (Fig 1A). ClotChip features a three-dimensional, parallel-plate, capacitive sensing structure integrated into a low-cost (material cost <$1) and disposable microfluidic biochip with miniscule sample volume (<10µL). The sensor is constructed from biocompatible and chemically inert materials (polymethyl methacrylate substrate and gold electrodes) to minimize the potential for artificial contact activation. ClotChip measurements were performed with whole blood from healthy volunteers (n=10) collected in 3.2% sodium citrate. Coagulation was induced with CaCl2. The ClotChip curves exhibited a reproducible rise to peak within 4.5 to 6 min (Tpeak; Fig 1B). Conventional coagulation tests were also performed in each of the healthy samples in duplicate and confirmed normal aPTT and PT values. ClotChip measurements were then performed in 7 clinical samples obtained from patients with coagulopathy. These patients were referred to a specialized Hematology clinic for work-up of coagulopathy. Four patients suffered from intrinsic pathway defects (2 with Hemophilia A, 3 with Hemophilia B), one patient from acquired von Willebrand (vW) factor defect and one patient from mild congenital hypo-dysfibrinogenemia (Fig 1C). Compared to the normal curve, all samples from patients with coagulopathy exhibited an abnormal curve with an extended Tpeak range of 7 to 15 minutes (p = 0.0004). An ROC curve was generated. The true positive rate was plotted against the false positive rate in Fig 1D. The Area Under the Curve for ClotChip (1.00) was higher than that of both aPTT (0.7813) and PT (0.5859), illustrating that ClotChip Tpeak parameter has superior sensitivity compared to conventional screening coagulation tests. Next, ClotChip measurements were performed with whole blood from 4 healthy donors after the samples were treated with 1µM prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) to inhibit platelet aggregation. We determined that PGE2-treated samples exhibited a statistically significant (p=0.03) lower peak height (Apeak) than that of untreated samples (Fig 1E) while Tpeak values remained unchanged between treated and untreated samples. This shows that the Apeak parameter is sensitive in response to platelet function and thatClotChip is able to detect platelet function defects. Conclusions: We have developed a novel dielectric microfluidic sensor (ClotChip) that is sensitive to multiple coagulation factors and platelet activity, thereby allowing whole blood assessment of hemostasis in a single disposable sensor. TheClotChip will bring blood coagulation testing closer to the patient for time-sensitive applications such as diagnosis of the bleeding patient and in trauma-induced coagulopathy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 1260-1267
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Biedermann ◽  
Marieke J. H. A. Kruip ◽  
A. M. H. P. van den Besselaar

SummaryMany patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) determine their INR using point-of-care (POC) whole blood coagulation monitors. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the INR within-subject variation in self-testing patients receiving a constant dose of VKA. The second aim of the study was to derive INR imprecision goals for whole blood coagulation monitors. Analytical performance goals for INR measurement can be derived from the average biological within-subject variation. Fifty-six Thrombosis Centres in the Netherlands were invited to select self-testing patients who were receiving a constant dose of either acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon for at least six consecutive INR measurements. In each patient, the coefficient of variation (CV) of INRs was calculated. One Thrombosis Centre selected regular patients being monitored with a POC device by professional staff. Sixteen Dutch Thrombosis Centres provided results for 322 selected patients, all using the CoaguChek XS. The median within-subject CV in patients receiving acenocoumarol (10.2 %) was significantly higher than the median CV in patients receiving phenprocoumon (8.6 %) (p = 0.001). The median CV in low-target intensity acenocoumarol self-testing patients (10.4 %) was similar to the median CV in regular patients monitored by professional staff (10.2 %). Desirable INR analytical imprecision goals for POC monitoring with CoaguChek XS in patients receiving either low-target intensity acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon were 5.1 % and 4.3 %, respectively. The approximate average value for the imprecision of the CoaguChek XS, i. e. 4 %, is in agreement with these goals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (07) ◽  
pp. 1116-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markandey M. Tripathi ◽  
Diane M. Tshikudi ◽  
Zeinab Hajjarian ◽  
Dallas C. Hack ◽  
Elizabeth M. Van Cott ◽  
...  

AbstractDelayed identification of coagulopathy and bleeding increases the risk of organ failure and death in hospitalized patients. Timely and accurate identification of impaired coagulation at the point-of-care can proactively identify bleeding risk and guide resuscitation, resulting in improved outcomes for patients. We test the accuracy of a novel optical coagulation sensing approach, termed iCoagLab, for comprehensive whole blood coagulation profiling and investigate its diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients at elevated bleeding risk. Whole blood samples from patients (N = 270) undergoing conventional coagulation testing were measured using the iCoagLab device. Recalcified and kaolin-activated blood samples were loaded in disposable cartridges and time-varying intensity fluctuation of laser speckle patterns were measured to quantify the clot viscoelastic modulus during coagulation. Coagulation parameters including the reaction time (R), clot progression time (K), clot progression rate (α), and maximum clot strength (MA) were derived from clot viscoelasticity traces and compared with mechanical thromboelastography (TEG). In all patients, a good correlation between iCoagLab- and TEG-derived parameters was observed (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that iCoagLab-derived parameters identified bleeding risk with sensitivity (94%) identical to, and diagnostic accuracy (89%) higher than TEG (87%). The diagnostic specificity of iCoagLab (77%) was significantly higher than TEG (69%). By rapidly and comprehensively permitting blood coagulation profiling the iCoagLab innovation is likely to advance the capability to identify patients with elevated risk for bleeding, with the ultimate goal of preventing life-threatening hemorrhage.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdolna Nagy ◽  
Sepanta Fazaeli ◽  
René van Oerle ◽  
Hugo ten Cate ◽  
Marcel Schemmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Platelet count can be altered in various diseases and treatments and measuring it may provide better insight into the expected outcome. So far, quantification of platelet count is done within laboratory conditions by using established hematology analyzers, whereas a point-of-care device could be used for this purpose outside of the clinical laboratories. Aim Our aim was to assess the closeness of agreement between a newly developed point-of-care PC100 platelet counter and two reference methods (Sysmex® XP-300, Sysmex® XN-9000) in measuring platelet counts in whole blood and platelet-rich-plasma (PRP). Method Whole blood was obtained from 119 individuals, of which 74 were used to prepare PRP samples. Whole blood platelet count was measured by the two reference methods and the PC100 platelet counter. PRP was prepared from the whole blood and platelet count was adjusted to the range of 250–3600 × 103/μl and measured with the PC100 platelet counter and Sysmex® XP-300. Results A median difference of − 1.35% and − 2.98% occurred in whole blood platelet count between the PC100 platelet counter and the Sysmex® XP-300 and Sysmex® XN-9000, respectively. A strong linear correlation (r ≥ 0.98) was seen in both cases and regression equations indicated neither a constant nor a proportional bias between the methods. Direct comparison of the two reference methods revealed a median difference of − 1.15% and a strongly linear relationship (r = 0.99). Platelet count in PRP resulted in a median difference of 1.42% between the PC100 platelet counter and the reference method, Sysmex® XP-300. While the difference between two methods increased with concentration of platelets in PRP, a strong linear relationship remained throughout the whole measuring interval indicated by the high correlation coefficient (r = 0.99). Assessment of the predicted bias at predefined platelet counts showed that the bias in platelet counts falls within the acceptance criterion for both whole blood and PRP measurements. Conclusions Our results show that the PC100 platelet counter can be used interchangeably with the reference methods for determining platelet counts.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Charles S Greenberg ◽  
James L. Wells ◽  
Caroline D Vaughn ◽  
Adrian Reuben

Abstract Abstract 2290 Recent studies document a paradoxical absence of bleeding in the setting of an abnormal PT and aPTT in cirrhosis. A new equilibrium is established between thrombin generation, fibrin formation and fibrinolysis in cirrhosis that confers protection from spontaneous bleeding and may pose a thrombotic risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the coagulation paradox in cirrhosis by using whole blood thromboelastometry. Citrate anticoagulated whole blood is added to a cuvette and coagulation is initiated by adding calcium with either a tissue factor (TF)-based reagent (ExTEM) or an intrinsic pathway activator reagent (InTEM). The transformation of blood into a gel is measured by a computer-based system (ROTEM Instrument) over 30 minutes. We collected samples after obtaining informed consent form patients with cirrhosis. Part of the sample was process for platelet-poor plasma and the PT and aPTT assays performed. The clotting time (CT) which is the time from the start of the assay until initiation of fibrin formation;the clot formation time (CFT), the time from initiation of clotting until a half maximum clot firmness were measured. In addition, maximal clot firmness (MCF) in the presence or absence of cytochalasin an inhibitor of platelet activation was also measured by Fib-TEM assay. The effect of platelet count on these measurements was also evaluated. A total of 54 patients were enrolled with a median MELD score of 16, median PT 19.5sec, median aPTT 46.5sec and median platelet count 77K/CUMM. Only 20% of the population had a platelet count greater than 100K/CUMM. The average CT and CFT measured by the ExTEM were 72sec (normal 38–79sec) and 178sec (normal 34–159sec) respectively. The InTEM assay average CT was 172sec (normal 100–240) and CFT 175sec (normal 20–110). Normal CT was seen in 73% of ExTEM measurements and normal CFT in 53%. CT in InTEM was normal in 93%. In contrast, the InTEM CFT was normal in only 20% of measurements. Changes in CFT, a measure of the rate of thrombin generation and fibrin formation, could be influenced by platelet count. Activated platelets must be able to bind and assemble enzyme complexes that promote thrombin formation. We measured ExTEM and InTEM assays with varying platelet concentrations in normal volunteers. The CFT prolonged in ExTEM assays at 75–90K/CUMM platelets and between 90–120K/CUMM with the InTEM assay for normal volunteers. The platelet count for cirrhotic patient samples that had an abnormal InTEM CFT had platelet count of 64K/CUMM while those with normal InTEM CFT had 136K/CUMM platelets. Cirrhosis patient samples with a normal CFT by ExTEM had an average platelet count of 95K/CUMM and those that had an abnormal CFT by ExTEM had a platelet count of 53K/CUMM. We then looked at whether fibrinogen levels as measured by a Fib TEM assay were normal in cirrhotic patients. We found that 84% had normal fibrinogen levels. When the MCF was abnormal 85% of the samples had platelet counts below 70K, while the others had a low fibrinogen level. Lastly we found 4 patients that had an elevated MCF and these patients had an elevated fibrinogen by FIB-TEM despite having a platelet counts less than 70 K. In conclusion, despite having abnormalities in PT and aPTT assays the ability to initiate and generate a fibrin gel in whole is not abnormal in many cirrhotic patients. If there is a defect in whole blood testing it is more readily detected by the INTEM assay a measure of the intrinsic pathway. The majority of the abnormalities in thrombin formation and generation of maximum fibrin clot are dependent on platelet number. Some patients with elevated fibrinogen levels can compensate for a reduced platelet number. These studies support recent data that suggest platelet count <70K increase the risk of bleeding after invasive procedures in cirrhosis. Future studies will examine whether whole blood coagulation assays can be used to identify cirrhotic patients at risk for bleeding and will require prospective randomized clinical studies. The coagulation paradox in cirrhosis requires evaluation of new assays to define hemorrhagic and thrombotic risk. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 056502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Meyer dos Santos ◽  
Anita Zorn ◽  
Zeno Guttenberg ◽  
Bettina Picard-Willems ◽  
Christina Kläffling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document