Detecting Hazardously Misleading Information on Safety-Critical Displays

Author(s):  
Bill X. Wang
Author(s):  
jie zhang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Fuxin Yang ◽  
Liang Li ◽  
Xiaosong Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Integrity monitoring of precise point positioning (PPP) can provide tightly guaranteed absolute position error bounds for safety-critical applications. However, complex local environment makes PPP integrity monitoring much more challenging, such as urban canyons. Significant prone multipaths and low observation redundancy are main difficulties to the accuracy and the reliability of PPP. Therefore, we proposed a solution separation-based integrity monitoring algorithm, which is based on a single and dual frequency-mixed undifferenced and uncombined PPP model considering compensation for the multipath error distortion by Gaussian overbounding. Both the static and the kinematic data are utilized to test the proposed algorithm. The results show that the proposed algorithm can produce adequate protection level in horizontal and vertical directions. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm can obtain smoother protection level and positioning error under the dynamic local environment, and effectively suppress the misleading information.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Gillespie ◽  
Kristen A. Diliberto-Macaluso ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anastasi

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-241
Author(s):  
Eberhard Zielke

Ninety identified Madagascan Dichaetomyia specimens, which are listed in an overview published in 2006, were checked as part of the investigation of a collection of unidentified Malagasy muscids. The results of 43 of the specimens tested were not consistent with the previous findings. In addition, some misleading information was found in the descriptions of new species. The deviations are listed and corrections are proposed. Six new species not recognized are described below.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane Littrell ◽  
Evan F. Risko ◽  
Jonathan Albert Fugelsang

Recent psychological research has identified important individual differences associated with receptivity to bullshit, which has greatly enhanced our understanding of the processes behind susceptibility to pseudo-profound or otherwise misleading information. However, the bulk of this research attention has focused on cognitive and dispositional factors related to bullshit (the product), while largely overlooking the influences behind bullshitting (the act). Here, we present results from four studies (focusing on the construction and validation of a new, reliable scale measuring the frequency with which individuals engage in two types of bullshitting (persuasive and evasive) in everyday situations. Overall, bullshitting frequency was negatively associated with sincerity, honesty, cognitive ability, open-minded cognition, and self-regard. Additionally, the Bullshitting Frequency Scale was found to reliably measure constructs that are: 1) distinct from lying, and; 2) significantly related to performance on overclaiming and social decision tasks. These results represent an important step forward by demonstrating the utility of the Bullshitting Frequency Scale as well as highlighting certain individual differences that may play important roles in the extent to which individuals engage in everyday bullshitting.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-285
Author(s):  
Huan HE ◽  
Zhong-wei XU ◽  
Gang YU ◽  
Shi-yu YANG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document