The assess method of validity for DGA sensor based on multiple criterion

Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Bo Qi ◽  
Zhihai Rong ◽  
Chengrong Li ◽  
Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Sopiko Gvaladze ◽  
Marlies Vervloet ◽  
Katrijn Van Deun ◽  
Henk A. L. Kiers ◽  
Eva Ceulemans

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne S. Desarbo ◽  
Venkatram Ramaswamy ◽  
Rabikar Chatterjee

The authors propose a methodology for determining the segment-level impact of explanatory variables on multiple criterion measures obtained on a constant-sum scale. These explanatory variables could characterize different product, situation, or person related conditions that either occur naturally or are experimentally manipulated. Their proposed methodology simultaneously estimates market segment membership and multivariate segment-level parameters for each dependent criterion, using finite mixtures of conditional Dirichlet distributions. They conduct a modest Monte Carlo simulation analysis to investigate the performance of the proposed methodology. The authors also provide an empirical application to industrial buying decisions that examines the impact of the type of buying situation on multiple vendor selection criteria such as economic cost, functional performance, vendor cooperation, and vendor capability.


1966 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Allan Easton

Persons responsible for evaluation of performance have found that use of single-criterion measures invariably leads to undesirable side-effects. As a remedy, designers of evaluation methods would like to use multiple in place of single criteria, but are likely to have difficulty in amalgamating their multiple measures into a meaningful whole. Here is a method for combining multiple-criterion scores into a conceptually satisfying, overall figure-of-merit which can be used to rank subjects or projects in order of their excellence.


1985 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice Place ◽  
Israel Kolvin ◽  
Angus Macmillan ◽  
Rory Nicol

SynopsisThe 4th- and 5th-year pupils of four large comprehensive schools, which were broadly typical of the schools serving an urban population, were screened using a multiple criterion approach. The screen results were compared with those found in a younger population drawn from the same area, and a similar rate of efficiency was found. However, in the adolescent age group the screen was more accurate at detecting true negative cases (specificity) but less able to identify true positive cases (sensitivity). Overall, the multiple criterion screen proved more efficient than a variety of single screen criteria, and the findings also suggest that certain screen measures used in adolescence may be more effective at identifying disturbed girls while others are more effective at identifying disturbed boys. This confirms the principle that the choice of screening instruments must be made with reference to their proposed use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document