scholarly journals Towards Better Concordance among Contextualized Evaluations in FAST-GDM Problems

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Marcelo Loor ◽  
Ana Tapia-Rosero ◽  
Guy De Tré
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Heterogeneous Group ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
High Level ◽  
Consensus Reaching ◽  
Novel Algorithm

A flexible attribute-set group decision-making (FAST-GDM) problem consists in finding the most suitable option(s) out of the options under consideration, with a general agreement among a heterogeneous group of experts who can focus on different attributes to evaluate those options. An open challenge in FAST-GDM problems is to design consensus reaching processes (CRPs) by which the participants can perform evaluations with a high level of consensus. To address this challenge, a novel algorithm for reaching consensus is proposed in this paper. By means of the algorithm, called FAST-CR-XMIS, a participant can reconsider his/her evaluations after studying the most influential samples that have been shared by others through contextualized evaluations. Since exchanging those samples may make participants’ understandings more like each other, an increase of the level of consensus is expected. A simulation of a CRP where contextualized evaluations of newswire stories are characterized as augmented intuitionistic fuzzy sets (AIFS) shows how FAST-CR-XMIS can increase the level of consensus among the participants during the CRP.

A framework for context-aware heterogeneous group decision making in business processes

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 39-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen De Maio ◽  
Giuseppe Fenza ◽  
Vincenzo Loia ◽  
Francesco Orciuoli ◽  
Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Heterogeneous Group ◽  
Context Aware

scholarly journals Teknik-teknik dalam Pengambilan Keputusan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putri Diana ◽  
Rusdinal ◽  
Hade Afriansyah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
New Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Group Technique

This article aims to describe how the technique should be used in decision making to get the right results and in accordance with the objectives to be achieved. The methodology used to arrange this article is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). First, researcher find relevant theories, and then make a conclusion about it, then analyzing, and finally make a new information based researcher analyzing. The result of this article base on the researcher analyzing is generally there are three techniques that can be used in decision making, such participatory technique, group decision making technique, and nominal group technique.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document